We hypothesized that prior categorization of an attribute might sometimes facilitate the ordering of stimuli, particularly when the number of stimuli is relatively large or some of them need to be remembered. In four experiments, participants were required to rank order either numbers or line lengths either using a selection sort or following prior categorization. The results indicated that prior categorization produced faster sorting when the number of stimuli to be ordered was relatively large and when the stimuli were not continuously visible.
AlgomD., & MarksL. E. (1990). Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: Towards a context-bound psychophysics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 706–727. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.16.4.706
2.
AlwinD. F., & KrosnickJ. A. (1985). The measurement of values in surveys: A comparison of ratings and rankings. Public Opinion Quarterly, 49, 535–552. doi:10.1086/26894
3.
AndersonJ. (1996). ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist, 51, 355–365. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355
4.
AndersonJ. R. (1991). The adaptive nature of human categorization. Psychological Review, 98, 409–429. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.3.409
5.
AndersonJ. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
AshbyF. G. (1992). Multidimensional models of categorization. In AshbyF. G. (Ed.), Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (pp. 449–483). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
ChignellM. H., & PattyB. W. (1987). Unidimensional scaling with efficient ranking methods. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 304–311.
8.
DavisonM. L., & SharmaA. R. (1988). Parametric statistics and levels of measurement. Psychological Bulletin, 104, 137–144.
9.
KempS. (1991). Magnitude estimation of the utility of public goods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 533–540.
10.
KempS., & GraceR. C. (2014). How do people order stimuli?Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76, 1847–1859. doi:10.3758/s13414-014-0678-3
11.
KerstS. M., & HowardJ. H. (1978). Memory psychophysics for visual area and length. Memory and Cognition, 6, 327–335.
12.
KnuthD. E. (1998). The art of computer programming. Vol. 3. Sorting and searching (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
KruegerL. E. (1989). Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Towards a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 251–320.
14.
LordF. M. (1953). On the statistical treatment of football numbers. American Psychologist, 8, 750–751.
15.
LuceR. D., KrantzD. H., SuppesP., & TverskyA. (1990). Foundations of measurement. Volume III. Representation, axiomatization, and invariance. Mineola: Dover.
16.
MaxwellS. E., & DelaneyH. D. (1985). Measurement and statistics: An examination of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 136–147.
17.
MichellJ. (1999). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
NarensL. (2002). Theories of meaningfulness. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
NgS. H. (1982). Choosing between the ranking and rating procedures for the comparison of values across cultures. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 169–172.
20.
NosofskyR. M., & StantonR. D. (2005). Speeded classification in a probabilistic category structure: Contrasting exemplar-retrieval, decision-boundary, and prototype models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 608–629. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.608
ParducciA. (1982). Category ratings: Still more contextual effects. In WegenerB. (Ed.), Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement (pp. 89–105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
ParducciA. (1992). Comment on Haubensak's associative theory of judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 310–313.
24.
ParducciA., & PerrettL. F. (1971). Category rating scales: Effects of relative spacing and frequency of stimulus values. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 427–452.
25.
PoultonE. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgements. Hove: Erlbaum.
26.
RankinW. L. & GrubeJ. W. (1980). A comparison of ranking and rating procedures for value system measurement. European Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 233–246.
27.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: The Free Press.
28.
RussellP. A., & GrayC. D. (1994). Ranking or rating? Some data and their implications for the measurement of evaluative response. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 79–92. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295
29.
StevensS. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
30.
StevensS. S. (1955). On the averaging of data. Science, 121, 113–116.
31.
StewartN., ChaterN., & BrownG. D. A. (2006). Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology, 53, 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003
32.
WegenerB. (Ed.). (1982). Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.