The study of gender differences in prospective memory (i.e., remembering to remember) has received modest attention in the literature. The few reported studies investigating either subjective or objective evaluations of prospective memory have shown inconsistent data. In this study, we aimed to verify the presence of gender differences during the performance of an objective prospective memory test by considering the weight of specific variables such as length of delay, type of response, and type of cue. We submitted a sample of 100 healthy Italian participants (50 men and 50 women) to a test expressly developed to assess prospective memory: The Memory for Intentions Screening Test. Women performed better than men in remembering to do an event-based task (i.e., prompted by an external event) and when the task required a physical response modality. We discuss the behavioural differences that emerged by considering the possible role of sociological, biological, neuroanatomical, and methodological variables.
BassoA., CapitaniE., & LaiaconaM. (1987). Raven's coloured progressive matrices: normative values on 305 adults normal controls. Functional Neurology, 2, 189–194.
2.
BloiseS. M., & JohnsonM. K. (2007). Memory for emotional and neutral information: Gender and individual differences in emotional sensitivity. Memory, 15, 192–204.
3.
BrandimonteM. A., EinsteinG. O., & McDanielM. A. (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4.
BrooksB. M., & GardinerJ. M. (1994). Age differences in memory for prospective compared with retrospective subject-performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 22, 27–33.
5.
CarlesimoG. A., CasadioP., & CaltagironeC. (2004). Prospective and retrospective components in the memory for actions to be performed in patients with severe closed-head injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 679–688.
6.
CeciS. J., & BronfenbrennerU. (1985). “Don't forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven”: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56, 152–164.
7.
ChoiJ., & SilvermanI. (2002). The relationship between testosterone and route-learning strategies in humans. Brain and Cognition, 50, 116–120.
8.
ColucciaE., & LouseG. (2004). Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 329–340.
9.
CrawfordJ., SmithG., MaylorE., Della SalaS., & LogieR. (2003). The prospective e retrospective memory questionnaire (PRMQ): Normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Memory, 11, 261–275.
10.
DriscollI., HamiltonD. A., YeoR. A., BrooksW. M. & SutherlandR. J. (2005). Virtual navigation in humans: The impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Hormones and Behavior, 47, 326–335.
11.
EinsteinG. O., & McDanielM. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new findings. In BrandimonteM., EinsteinG. O., & McDanielM. A. (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115–141). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
EllisJ., & KvavilashviliL. (2000). Prospective memory in 2000: Past, present and future directions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S1–S9.
13.
EngelkampJ. (1997). Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for performed tasks. Memory & Cognition, 25, 117–124.
14.
Farrell PagulayanK., BuschR. M., MedinaK. L., BartokJ. A., & KrikorianR. (2006). Developmental normative data for the Corsi Block-tapping task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 1043–1052.
15.
GordonB. A., SheltonJ. T., BuggJ. M., McDanielM. A., & HeadD. (2011). Structural correlates of prospective memory. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3795–3800.
16.
GoschkeT., & KuhlJ. (1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 1211–1226.
17.
HenryJ. D., MacLeodM. S., PhillipsL. H., & CrawfordJ. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology and Aging, 19, 27–39.
18.
HerlitzA., AiraksinenE., & NordströmE. (1999). Sex differences in episodic memory: The impact of verbal and visuospatial ability. Neuropsychology, 13, 590–597.
19.
HerlitzA., & RehnmanA. J. (2008). Sex differences in episodic memory. Current directions in Psychological Science, 17, 52–56.
20.
HerlitzA., & YonkerJ. E. (2002). Sex differences in episodic memory: The Influence of Intelligence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section A), 24, 107–114.
21.
HicksJ. L., MarshR. L., & RussellE. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160–1169.
22.
HuppertF. A., JohnsonT., & NicksonJ. (2000). High prevalence of prospective memory impairment in the elderly and in early-stage dementia: Findings from a population-based study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S63–S81.
23.
KoriatA., Ben-ZurH., & NussbaumA. (1990). Encoding information for the future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks. Memory & Cognition, 18, 568–578.
24.
KvavilashviliL. (1987). Remembering intention as a distinct form of memory. British Journal of Psychology, 78, 507–518.
25.
LewinC., & HerlitzA. (2002). Sex differences in face recognition—Women's faces make the difference. Brain and Cognition, 50, 121–128.
26.
LinnM. C., & PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.
27.
MaylorE. A. (1996). Age-related impairment in an event-based prospective-memory task. Psychology and Aging, 11, 74–78.
28.
MaylorE. A., & LogieR. H. (2010). A large-scale comparison of prospective and retrospective memory development from childhood to middle age. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 442–451.
29.
McDanielM. A., & EinsteinG. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
30.
MeachamJ. A., & LeimanB. (1982). Remembering to perform future actions. In NeisserU. (Ed.), Memory observed: Remembering in natural contexts (pp. 327–336). San Francisco: Freeman.
31.
PiauilinoD. C., BuenoO. F., TufikS., BittencourtL. R., Santos-SilviaR., HachulH., … PompéiaS. (2010). The prospective and retrospective memory questionaire: A population-based random sampling study. Memory, 18, 413–426.
32.
PruessnerJ. C., CollinsD. L., PruessnerM., & EvansA. C. (2001). Age and gender predict volume decline in the anterior and posterior hippocampus in early adulthood. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 194–200.
33.
RabbittP., MaylorE., MclnnesL., BentN., & MooreB. (1995). What goods can self-assessment questionnaires deliver for cognitive gerontology?Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, S127–S152.
34.
RaskinS. A. (2004). Memory for intentions screening test [abstract]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 110.
35.
RaskinS. A. (2009). Memory for intentions screening test: Psychometric properties and clinical evidence. Brain Impairment, 10, 23–33.
36.
SchaeferE. G., KozakM. V., & SagnessK. (1998). The role of enactment in prospective remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26, 644–650.
37.
SeemanT. E., & McEwenB. S. (1996). The impact of social environment characteristics on neuroendocrine regulation. Psychosomatic Medicine, 58, 459–471.
38.
SilvermanI., KastukD., ChoiJ., PhillipsK. (1999). Testosterone levels and spatial ability in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 24, 813–822.
39.
UttlB., GrafP., MillerJ., & TuokkoH. (2001). Pro- and retrospective memory in late adulthood. Consciousness and Cognition, 10, 451–472.
40.
WaberD. P. (1977). Biological substrates of field dependence: Implications of the sex difference. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 1076–1087.
41.
WangQ. (2013). Gender and emotion in everyday event memory. Memory, 21, 503–511.
42.
WilsonB., CockburnJ., & BaddeleyA. D. (1990). RBMT-Test di memoria comportamentale di Rivermead. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
43.
WoodsS. P., MoranL. M., DawsonM. S., CareyC. L., & GrantI. (2008). Psychometric characteristics of the memory for intention screening test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 864–878.
44.
ZeintlM., KliegelM., & HoferS. M. (2007). The role of processing resources in age-related prospective and retrospective memory within old age. Psychology and Aging, 22, 826–834.
