We use the results of a large online experiment on word knowledge in Dutch to investigate variables influencing vocabulary size in a large population and to examine the effect of word prevalence—the percentage of a population knowing a word—as a measure of word occurrence. Nearly 300,000 participants were presented with about 70 word stimuli (selected from a list of 53,000 words) in an adapted lexical decision task. We identify age, education, and multilingualism as the most important factors influencing vocabulary size. The results suggest that the accumulation of vocabulary throughout life and in multiple languages mirrors the logarithmic growth of number of types with number of tokens observed in text corpora (Herdan's law). Moreover, the vocabulary that multilinguals acquire in related languages seems to increase their first language (L1) vocabulary size and outweighs the loss caused by decreased exposure to L1. In addition, we show that corpus word frequency and prevalence are complementary measures of word occurrence covering a broad range of language experiences. Prevalence is shown to be the strongest independent predictor of word processing times in the Dutch Lexicon Project, making it an important variable for psycholinguistic research.
AdelmanJ. S., BrownG. D. A., & QuesadaJ. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17(9), 814–823. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x
2.
BalotaD. A., CorteseM. J., Sergent-MarshallS. D., SpielerD. H., & YapM. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
3.
BalotaD. A., YapM. J., HutchisonK. A., CorteseM. J., KesslerB., LoftisB., … TreimanR. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459.
4.
den BoonT., & GeeraertsD. (2005). Van Dale: groot woordenboek van de Nederlandse taal. Utrecht: Van Dale Lexicografie.
BrysbaertM., & NewB. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
7.
BrysbaertM., WarrinerA. B., & KupermanV. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911.
8.
De CaluweJ. (2012). Dutch in Belgium: facing multilingualism in a context of regional monolingualism and standard language ideology. In M. Hüning, U. Vogl, & O. Moliner (Eds.), Standard languages and multilingualism in European history (Vol. 1, pp. 259–282). Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Retrieved from http://benjamins.com/catalog/mdm.1
9.
DoranH., BatesD., BlieseP., & DowlingM. (2007). Estimating the multilevel Rasch model: With the lme4 package. Journal of Statistical Software, 20(2), 1–18.
10.
DufauS., DuñabeitiaJ. A., Moret-TatayC., McGonigalA., PeetersD., AlarioF.-X., … GraingerJ. (2011). Smart phone, smart science: How the use of smartphones can revolutionize research in cognitive science. PLoS ONE, 6(9), e24974. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0024974
11.
GibsonE., PiantadosiS., & FedorenkoK. (2011). Using mechanical turk to obtain and analyze English acceptability judgments. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5(8), 509–524. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2011.00295.x
12.
GollanT. H., MontoyaR. I., CeraC., & SandovalT. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(3), 787–814. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.07.001
13.
HerdanG. (1960). Type-token mathematics: A textbook of mathematical linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
14.
KeuleersE., & BrysbaertM. (2010). Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generator. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 627–633. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.627
15.
KeuleersE., BrysbaertM., & NewB. (2010). SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 643–650. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.643
16.
KeuleersE., DiependaeleK., & BrysbaertM. (2010). Practice effects in large-scale visual word recognition studies: A lexical decision study on 14,000 dutch mono- and sisyllabic words and nonwords. Frontiers in Psychology, 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00174
17.
KupermanV., Stadthagen-GonzalezH., & BrysbaertM. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
18.
KupermanV., & Van DykeJ. A. (2013). Reassessing word frequency as a determinant of word recognition for skilled and unskilled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(3), 802–823. doi:10.1037/a0030859
19.
LemhöferK., & BroersmaM. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid Lexical Test for Advanced Learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0146-0
20.
LoveB. C., MedinD. L., & GureckisT. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111(2), 309–332. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309
21.
McCabeD. P., RoedigerH. L., McDanielM. A., BalotaD. A., & HambrickD. Z. (2010). The relationship between working memory capacity and executive functioning: Evidence for a common executive attention construct. Neuropsychology, 24(2), 222–243. doi:10.1037/a0017619
22.
MehlM. R., VazireS., Ramirez-EsparzaN., SlatcherR. B., & PennebakerJ. W. (2007). Are women really more talkative than men?Science, 317(5834), 82–82. doi:10.1126/science.1139940
23.
NationI. S. P., & BeglarD. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13.
24.
ParkD. C., LautenschlagerG., HeddenT., DavidsonN. S., SmithA. D., & SmithP. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299–320. doi:10.1037//0882-7974.17.2.299 doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299
25.
RamscarM., HendrixP., LoveB., & BaayenR. H. (2013). Learning is not decline: The mental lexicon as a window into cognition across the lifespan. The Mental Lexicon, 8(3), 450–481.
26.
RamscarM., HendrixP., ShaoulC., MilinP., & BaayenH. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 5–42. doi:10.1111/tops.12078
27.
RavenJ. C. (1965). Guide to using the Mill Hill vocabulary test with progressive matrices. London: HK Lewis.
28.
SchepensJ., DijkstraT., & GrootjenF. (2012). Distributions of cognates in Europe as based on Levenshtein distance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 157–166. doi:10.1017/S1366728910000623
29.
Singh-ManouxA., KivimakiM., GlymourM. M., ElbazA., BerrC., EbmeierK. P., … DugravotA. (2012). Timing of onset of cognitive decline: Results from Whitehall II prospective cohort study. BMJ, 344, d7622–d7622. doi:10.1136/bmj.d7622
30.
StubbeR. (2012). Do pseudoword false alarm rates and overestimation rates in Yes/No vocabulary tests change with Japanese university students’ English ability levels?Language Testing, 29(4), 471–488. doi:10.1177/0265532211433033
31.
SrivastavaS., JohnO. P., GoslingS. D., & PotterJ. (2003). Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1041–1053.
32.
Van HeuvenW. J. B., ManderaP., KeuleersE., & BrysbaertM. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
33.
WarrinerA. B., KupermanV., & BrysbaertM. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
34.
YapM. J., BalotaD. A., SibleyD. E., & RatcliffR. (2012). Individual differences in visual word recognition: Insights from the English lexicon project. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(1), 53–79. doi:10.1037/a0024177
35.
YarkoniT., BalotaD., & YapM. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
36.
ZacharyR. A., & ShipleyW. C. (1986). Shipley institute of living scale: Revised manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
