We examined the development of sensitivity to general and specific numerical features in typical achievers and in 6th and 8th graders with mathematics learning disability (MLD), using two effects in mental multiplication: operand-relatedness (i.e., difficulty in avoiding errors that are related to the operands via a shared multiplication row) and decade-consistency (i.e., difficulty in avoiding errors that are operand related and also share a decade with the true result). Responses to decade-consistent products were quick but erroneous. In line with the processing sequence in adults, children first became sensitive to the general numerical feature of operand-relatedness (typical achievers—from 3rd grade; children with MLD in 8th grade) and only later to the specific feature of decade-consistency (typical achievers—from 4th grade, but only from 6th grade in a mature pattern). Implications of the numerical sensitivity in children with MLD are discussed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
AshcraftM. H. (1992). Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory. Cognition, 44, 75–106. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(92)90051-I
3.
BerchD. B. (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339. doi: 10.1177/00222194050380040901
4.
ButterworthB., MarchesiniN., & GirelliL. (2003). Basic multiplication combinations: Passive storage or dynamic reorganization? InDowkerA. & BaroodyA. J. (Eds.), The development of arithmetic concepts and skills (pp. 189–202). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5.
CalhoonM. B., EmersonR. W., FloresM., & HouchinsD. E. (2007). Computational fluency performance profile of high school students with mathematical disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 292–303. doi: 10.1177/07419325070280050401
6.
CampbellJ. I. D. (1987). Production, verification and priming of multiplication facts. Memory & Cognition, 15, 349–364. doi: 10.3758/BF03197037
7.
CampbellJ. I. D. (1995). Mechanisms of simple addition and multiplication: A modified network-interference theory and simulation. Mathematical Cognition, 1, 121–164.
CampbellJ. I. D., DowdR. R., FrickJ. M., McCallumK. N., & MetcalfeA. W. S. (2011). Neighborhood consistency and memory for number facts. Memory and Cognition, 39, 884–893. doi: 10.3758/s13421-010-0064-x
10.
ChoS., RyaliS., GearyD. C., & MenonV. (2011). How does a child solve 7+8? Decoding brain activity patterns associated with counting and retrieval strategies. Developmental Science, 14, 989–1001. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01055.x
11.
De BrauwerJ., & FiasW. (2009). A longitudinal study of children's performance of simple multiplication and division problems. Developmental Psychology, 45, 1480–1496. doi: 10.1037/a0015465
12.
De BrauwerJ., VergutsT., & FiasW. (2006). The representation of multiplication facts: Developmental changes in the problem size, five, and tie effects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2005.11.004
13.
DomahsF., & DelazerM. (2005). Some assumptions and facts about arithmetic facts. Psychology Science, 47, 96–111.
14.
DomahsF., DelazerM., & NuerkH. C. (2006). What makes multiplication facts difficult—problem size or neighbouring consistency?Experimental Psychology, 53, 275–282. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.53.4.275
15.
DomahsF., DomahsU., SchlesewskyM., RatinckxE.VergutsT., WillmesK., … NuerkH.-C. (2007). Neighborhood consistency in mental arithmetic: Behavioral and ERP evidence. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3(66), 1–16.
16.
GearyD. G. (2004). Mathematics and learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 4–15. doi: 10.1177/00222194040370010201
17.
HatanoG. (2003). Commentary: Conceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32, 26–29. doi: 10.3102/0013189X032008026
18.
Israel Ministry of Education - The Israeli Authority for Assessment and Evaluation. (2007). Meitzav—a standard mathematics test for 2nd—6th grades, November version. Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
19.
Israel Ministry of Education - The Israeli Authority for Assessment and Evaluation. (2010). Meitzav—a standard mathematics test for 2nd—6th grades, November version. Jerusalem, Israel: Author.
20.
JordanN., HanichL. B., & KaplanD. (2003). A longitudinal study of mathematical competencies in children with specific mathematics difficulties versus children with comorbid mathematics and reading difficulties. Child Development, 74, 834–850. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00571
21.
LemaireP., & SieglerR. S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 83–97. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.124.1.83
22.
MabbottD. J., & BisanzJ. (2008). Computational skills, working memory, and conceptual knowledge in older children with mathematics learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 15–28. doi: 10.1177/0022219407311003
23.
MazzoccoM. M. M., DevlinK. T., & McKennyS. J. (2008). Is it a fact? Timed arithmetic performance of children with mathematics learning disabilities (MLD) varies as a function of how MLD is defined. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 318–344. doi: 10.1080/87565640801982403
24.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
25.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the national mathematics advisory panel.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
26.
OstadS. A. (1997). Developmental differences in addition strategies: A comparison of mathematically disabled and mathematically normal children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 345–357. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01249.x
27.
OstadS. A. (1999). Developmental progression of subtraction strategies: A comparison of mathematically normal and mathematically disabled children. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14, 21–36. doi: 10.1080/0885625990140103
28.
RavenJ. C. (1996). Standard progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
29.
RousselleL., & NoelM. P. (2008). Mental arithmetic in children with mathematics learning disabilities: The Adaptive Use of Approximate Calculation in an Addition Verification Task. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 498–513. doi: 10.1177/0022219408315638
30.
RubinstenO., & HenikA. (2009). Developmental dyscalculia: Heterogeneity may not mean different mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 92–99. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.002
31.
ShalevR. S. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia. Journal of Child Neurology, 19, 765–771. doi: 10.1177/08830738040190100601
32.
ShanyM., LahmanD., ShalemZ., BahatA., & ZeigerT. (2006). Alef-Tav: A set for diagnosing disabilities in reading and writing processes according to Israeli norms. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Mofet Institute and Nitzan.
33.
SherinB., & FusonK. (2005). Multiplication strategies and the appropriation of computational resources. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 36, 347–395.
34.
VergutsT., & FiasW. (2005). Interacting neighbors: A connectionist model of retrieval in single-digit multiplication. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1–16.
