The aim of this study was to examine age-related differences in time judgments during childhood as a function of the temporal task used. Children aged 5 and 8 years, as well as adults, were submitted to 3 temporal tasks (bisection, generalization and reproduction) with short (0.4/0.8 s) and long durations (8/16 s). Furthermore, their cognitive capacities in terms of working memory, attentional control, and processing speed were assessed by a wide battery of neuropsychological tests. The results showed that the age-related differences in time judgment were greater in the reproduction task than in the temporal discrimination tasks. This task was indeed more demanding in terms of working memory and information processing speed. In addition, the bisection task appeared to be easier for children than the generalization task, whereas these 2 tasks were similar for the adults, although the generalization task required more attention to be paid to the processing of durations. Our study thus demonstrates that it is important to understand the different cognitive processes involved in time judgment as a function of the temporal tasks used before venturing to draw conclusions about the development of time perception capabilities.
AlbaretJ.-M., & MiglioreL. (1999). Manuel du test de Stroop (8–15 ans). Paris: Editions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée.
2.
AndersonP. J., & ReidyN. (2012). Assessing executive function in preschoolers. Neuropsychologial Review, 22, 345–360.
3.
ArlinM. (1986a). The effect of quantity, complexity, and attentional demand on children's time perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 40(3), 177–182.
4.
ArlinM. (1986b). The effect of quantity and depth of processing on children's time perception. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 84–98.
5.
BaudouinA., VannesteS., PouthasV., & IsingriniM. (2006a). Age-related changes in duration reproduction: Involvement of working memory processes. Brain and Cognition, 62(1), 17–23.
6.
BaudouinA., VannesteS., IsingriniM., & PouthasV. (2006b). Differential involvement of internal clock and working memory in the production and reproduction of duration: A study on older adults. Acta Psychologica, 121, 285–296.
7.
BlockR. A., HancockP. A., & ZakayD. (2010). How cognitive loads affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134, 330–343.
8.
BlockR. A., ZakayD., & HancockP. A. (1999). Developmental changes in human duration judgements: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Review, 19, 183–211.
9.
BrownS. W., CollierS. A. & NightJ. C. (2012). Timing and executive resources: Dual-task interference patterns between temporal production, and shifting, updating, and inhibition task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Percception and Performance, 39(4), 947–963.
10.
CamosV., & BarouilletP. (2014). Le développement de la mémoire de travail: perspectives dans le cadre du modèle partage temporel des ressources. Psychologie Française, 59(1), 21–39.
11.
CaseR. (1985). Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.
12.
CaseyB. J., TottenhamN., ListonC., & DurstonS. (2005). Imaging the developing brain: What have learned about cognitive development?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 104–110.
13.
ChurchR. M., & DelutyM. Z. (1977). Bisection of temporal intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 3, 216–228.
ClémentA., & Droit-VoletS. (2006). Counting in a temporal discrimination task in children and adults. Behavioural Processes, 71, 164–171.
16.
CohenM. J. (1997). Examiner's manual: Children's memory scale. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Brace.
17.
CrowderA., & HohleR. (1970). Time estimation by young children with and without informational feedback. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 10, 295–307.
18.
DelgadoM. L., & Droit-VoletS. (2007). Testing the representation of time in reference memory in the bisection and the generalization task: The utility of a developmental approach. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 820–836.
19.
DemetriouA., MouyiA., & SpanoudisG. (2008). Modeling the structure and development of g. Intelligence, 36, 437–454.
20.
Droit-VoletS. (2002). Scalar timing in temporal generalization in children with short and long stimulus durations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1193–1209.
21.
Droit-VoletS. (2008). A further investigation of the filled duration illusion with the comparison between children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34(3), 400–414.
22.
Droit-VoletS. (2010). Stop using time reproduction tasks in a comparative perspective without further analyses of the role of the motor response on the temporal performance: The case of children. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 130–148.
23.
Droit-VoletS. (2013). Time perception in children: A neurodevelopmental approach. Neuropsychologia, 51, 220–234.
24.
Droit-VoletS., ClémentA., & WeardenJ. (2001). Temporal Generalization in 3- to 8-Year-Old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 271–288.
25.
Droit-VoletS., DelgadoM. de L., & RattatA. C. (2006). The development of the ability to judge time in children. In MarrowJ. R. (Ed.), Focus on child psychology research (pp. 81–104). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
26.
Droit-VoletS., & RattatA. C. (2007). A further analysis of temporal bisection behavior in children with and without reference memory: The similiarity and the partition task. Acta Psychologica, 125, 240–256.
27.
Droit-VoletS., TourretS., & WeardenJ. (2004). Perception of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli in children and adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A(5), 797–818.
28.
Droit-VoletS., & WeardenJ. H. (2001). Temporal bisection in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 142–159.
29.
Droit-VoletS., & ZélantiP. (2013a). Time sensitivity in children and adults: Duration ratios in bisection. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(4), 687–704.
30.
Droit-VoletS., & ZélantiP. S. (2013b). Development of time sensitivity and information processing speed. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71424.
31.
Droit-VoletS., ZélantiP. S., DellatolasG., KiefferV., El MassiouiN., BrownB. L., … GrillJ. (2013). Time perception in children treated for a cerebellar medulloblastoma. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 480–494.
32.
FougnieD. (2008). The relationship between attention and working memory. In JoiahnsenN. B. (Ed.), New research on short-term memory (pp. 1–45). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
33.
FryA., & HaleS. (1996). Processing speed, working memory, and fluid intelligence: Evidence for a developmental cascade. Psychological Science, 7(4), 237–241.
34.
GathercoleS. E. (2002). Memory development during the childhood year. In BaddeleyA. D., KopelmanM. D., & WilsonB. A. (Eds.), Handbook of memory disorders (2nd ed., pp. 475–500). New York: Wiley.
35.
GautierT., & Droit-VoletS. (2002a). Attention and time estimation in 5- and 8-year-old children: A dual-task procedure. Behavioural Processes, 58, 56–66.
36.
GautierT., & Droit-VoletS. (2002b). The impact of attentional distraction on temporal bisection in children. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 27–34.
37.
GibbonJ. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84, 279–325.
38.
GibbonJ., ChurchR. M., & MeckW. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. In GibbonJ. & AllanL. (Eds.), Annals of the New York academy of sciences, 423: Timing and time perception (pp. 52–77). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
39.
GrégoireJ. (2007). L'examen clinique de l'intelligence de l'enfant: fondements et pratiques du Wisc-IV. Ware: Mardaga.
40.
JonesM. R., & McAuleyJ. D. (2005). Time judgments in global temporal contexts. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 398–417.
41.
KailR. (1991). Developmental change in speed of processing during childhood and adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 490–501.
42.
KailR. V. (2001). Development of processing speed in childhood and adolescence. In ReeseH. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 151–185). San Diego: Academic Press.
43.
KilleenP. R., FettermanJ. G., & BizoL. A. (1997). Time's causes. In BradshawC. M. & SzabadiE. (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 79–131). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.
44.
KorkmanM., KirkU., & KempS. (1998). NEPSY: A developmental neuropsychological assessment. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation (French version 2003).
45.
McCormackT., BrownG. D. A., MaylorE. A., DarbyR. J., & GreenD. (1999). Developmental changes in time estimation: Comparing childhood and old age. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1143–1155.
46.
McCormackT., BrownG. D. A., SmithM. C., & BrockJ. (2004). A timing-specific memory distortion effect in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 33–56.
47.
MiyakeA., FriedmanN. P., EmersonM. J., WitzkiA. H., & HowerterA. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100.
48.
MiyakeA., & ShahP. (1999). Toward unified theories of working memory: Emerging general consensus, unresolved theoretical issues, and future research directions. In MiyakeA. & ShahP. (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (pp. 442–481). New York: Cambridge University Press.
49.
OgdenR. S., SalominaiteE., JonesL. A., FiskJ. E., & MontgomeryC. (2011). The role of executive functions in human prospective interval timing. Acta Psychologica, 137(3), 352–358.
50.
OgdenR. S., WeardenJ. H., & MontgomeryC. (2014). The differential contribution of executive functions to emporal generalization, reproduction and verbal estimation. Acta Psychologica, 152, 84–94.
51.
PackwoodS., HodgettsH. M. & TremblayS. (2011). A multiperspective approach to the conceptualization of excecutive functions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(4), 456–470.
52.
PenneyT., GibbonJ., & MeckW. (2000). Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1770–1787.
53.
PerbalS., Droit-VoletS., IsingriniM., & PouthasV. (2002). Relationships between age-related changes in time estimation and age-related changes in processing speed, attention and memory. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition (Neuropsychology, Development and Cognition: Section B), 9(3), 201–216.
54.
RattatA. C., & Droit-VoletS. (2012). What is the best and easiest method of preventing counting in different temporal tasks?Behavior Research Methods, 44, 67–80.
55.
ReitanR. M. (1992). Trail making Test: Manual for administration and scoring. Tucson, AZ: Reitan Neuropsychology Laboratory.
56.
RiccioC. A., GarlandB. H., & CohenM. J. (2007). Relations between the test of variables of attention (TOVA) and the children's memory scale (CMS). Journal of Attention Disorders, 11, 167–171.
57.
RiemerM., TrojanJ., KleinböhlD., & HölzlR. (2012). A “view from nowhen” on time perception experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1118–1124.
58.
RubiaK. (2013). Functional brain imaging across development. European Child Adolescnce Psychiatry, 22, 719–731.
59.
SowellE. R., PetersonB. S., ThompsonP. M., WelcomeS. E., HenkeniusA. L., & TogaA. W. (2003). Mapping cortical change across the human life span. Nature Neuroscience, 6(3), 309–315.
60.
SzelagE., KowalskaJ., RymarczykK., & PöppelE. (2002). Duration processing in children as determined by time reproduction: Implications for a few seconds temporal window. Acta Psychologica, 110, 1–9.
61.
UlbrichP., ChuranJ., FinkM., & WittmannM. (2007). Temporal reproduction: Further evidence for 2 processes. Acta Psychologica, 125(1), 51–65.
62.
WeardenJ. H. (1991). Human performance on an analogue of an interval bisection task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 59–81.
63.
WeardenJ. H. (1992). Temporal generalization in humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 134–144.
64.
WeardenJ. H., & FerraraA. (1995). Stimulus spacing effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 289–310.
65.
WeardenJ., & FerraraA. (1996). Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 24–44.
66.
WeardenJ. H., & JonesL. A. (2013). Explaining between-group differences in performance on timing tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 179–199.
67.
WechslerD. (1998). WAIS III and WMS-III manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
68.
ZakayD. (1989). Subjective and attentional resource allocation: An integrated model of time estimation. In LevinI. & ZakayD. (Eds.), Time and human cognition (pp. 365–397). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
69.
ZakayD. (1992). The role of attention in children's time perception. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 54, 355–371.
70.
ZakayD., & BlockR. A. (1996). The role of attention in time estimation processes. In PastorM. A. & ArtiedaJ. (Eds.), Time, internal clocks and movement (pp. 143–164). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
71.
ZakayD., & BlockR. A. (1998). New perspectives on prospective time estimation. In DeKeyserV., d'YdewalleG., & VandierendonckA. (Eds.), Time and the dynamic control of behavior (pp. 129–141). Göttingen: Hogrefe and Huber.
72.
ZélantiP., & Droit-VoletS. (2011). Cognitive abilities explaining age-related changes in time perception of short and long durations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(2), 143–157.
73.
ZélantiP., & Droit-VoletS. (2012). Auditory and visual differences in time perception?. An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112, 296–311.
