CholinJ., DellG. S., & LeveltW. J. M. (2011). Planning and articulation in incremental word production: Syllable-frequency effects in English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 37, 109–122.
2.
DamianM. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single–Word speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 416–431.
3.
KawamotoA. H., KelloC. T., JonesR. M., & BameK. (1998). Initial phoneme versus whole word criterion to initiate pronunciation: Evidence based on response latency and initial phoneme duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 862–885.
4.
KawamotoA. H., LiuQ., LeeR. J., & GrebeP. R. (2014). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2340–2359.
5.
LeveltW. J. M., RoelofsA., & MeyerA. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–38.
6.
O'SeaghdhaP. G., & FrazerA. K. (2014). The exception does not rule: Attention constrains form preparation in word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 797–810.
7.
RoelofsA. (2004). Seriality of phonological encoding in naming objects and reading their names. Memory & Cognition, 32, 212–222.
8.
SchriefersH., & TeruelE. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 17–50.
9.
SulpizioS., & BuraniC. (2014). Reading segments is not reading words: Comment on Kawamoto et al. (2014). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.975255.
