BuetiD., & WalshV. (2009). The
parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other
magnitudes. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal
Society-Biological Section, 364,
1831–1840.
2.
ChenQ., & VergutsT. (2010).
Beyond the mental number line: A neural network model of
number–space interactions. Cognitive
Psychology, 60,
218–240.
3.
DehaeneS., BossiniS., & GirauxP. (1993). The
mental representation of parity and number magnitude.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
122,
371–396.
4.
van DijckJ.-P., AbrahamseE. L., MajerusS., & FiasW. (2013).
Spatial attention drives serial order retrieval in verbal
working memory. Psychological Science,
24(9),
1854–1859.
5.
van DijckJ.-P., AbrahamseE. L., AcarF., KetelsB., & FiasW. (2014). A
working memory account of the interaction between numbers and spatial
attention. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67,
1500–1513.
6.
FiasW., van DijckJ.-P., &
GeversW. (2011). How
is number associated with space? The role of working memory.
In DehaeneS. & BrannonE. (Eds.), Space, time, and number
in the brain (pp. 133–148).
Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic
Press.
7.
FischerM. H. (2012).
A hierarchical view of grounded, embodied and situated
numerical cognition. Cognitive Processing,
13,
S161–S164.
8.
FischerM. H., &
BruggerP. (2011).
When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point
to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition.
Frontiers in Psychology, 2,
260. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
9.
FischerM. H., CastelA. D., DoddM. D., &
PrattJ. (2003).
Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of
attention. Nature Neuroscience,
6(6),
555–556.
10.
Fischer, M. H., & Shaki, S. (2014). Spatial associations in
numerical cognition. From single digits to arithmetic. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67,
1461–1483.
11.
ItoY., & HattaT. (2004).
Spatial structure of quantitative representation of numbers:
Evidence from the SNARC effect. Memory &
Cognition, 32,
662–673.
12.
JiangM., CooperJ., & AlibaliM. (2014).
Spatial factors influence arithmetic performance: The case of
the minus sign. The Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 67,
1626–1642.
13.
KleinE., HuberS., NuerkH.-C., &
MoellerK. (2014).
Operational momentum affects eye fixation
behaviour. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67,
1614–1625.
14.
KnopsA., DehaeneS., BertelettiI., & ZorziM. (2014). Can
approximate mental calculation account for operational momentum in addition
and subtraction?The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
67,
1541–1556.
15.
LakoffG., & NunezR. (2000). Where
mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into
being. New York:
Basic Books.
16.
LinkT., NuerkH. C., &
MoellerK. (2014). On
the relation between the mental number line and arithmetic
competencies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67,
1597–1613.
17.
MarghetisT., NúñezR., & BergenB. (2014).
Doing arithmetic by hand: Hand movements during exact
arithmetic reveal systematic, dynamic spatial processing.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
67,
1579–1596.
18.
MassonN., & PesentiM. (2014).
Attentional bias induced by solving simple and complex
addition and subtraction problems. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67,
1514–1526.
19.
PinhasM., ShakiS., & FischerM. H. (2014).
Heed the signs: Operation signs have spatial
associations. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67,
1527–1540.
20.
ProctorR. W., & ChoY. S. (2006).
Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance
of speeded binary classification tasks.
Psychological Bulletin, 132,
416–442.
21.
ScheepersC., & SturtP. (2014).
Bi-directional syntactic priming across cognitive domains:
From arithmetic to language and back. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67,
1643–1654.
22.
SchwarzW., & KeusI. (2004).
Moving the eyes along the mental number line: Comparing SNARC
effects with manual and saccadic responses.
Perception and Psychophysics, 66,
651–664.
23.
ShakiS., & FischerM. H. (2012).
Multiple spatial mappings in numerical
cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 38(3),
804–809.
24.
ViarougeA., HubbardE., & DehaeneS. (2014). The
organization of spatial reference frames involved in the SNARC
effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 67,
1484–1499.
25.
WernerK., & RaabM. (2014).
Moving your eyes to solution: Effects of movement on the
perception of a problem-solving task. The Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67,
1571–1578.
26.
WiemersM., BekkeringH., &
LindemannO. (2014).
Spatial interferences in mental arithmetic: Evidence from the
motion-arithmetic compatibility effect. The
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67,
1557–1570.