It has long been held that steering a vehicle is subserved by two distinct visual processes, a compensatory one for maintaining lane position and an anticipatory one for previewing the curvature of the upcoming road. In this study, we investigated the robustness of these two steering control processes by systematically degrading their visual inputs. Performance was measured at the level of vehicle position and at the level of the actions on the steering wheel. The results show that the compensatory process is more robust to visual degradation than the anticipatory process. The results are also consistent with the idea that steering is under the supervision of a combination of compensatory and anticipatory mechanisms, although they suggest that the quality of the sensory information will determine how information is combined.
AuthiéC. N., & MestreD. R. (2011). Optokinetic nystagmus is elicited by curvilinear optic flow during high speed curve driving. Vision Research, 51, 1791–1800. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2011.06.010
2.
BillingtonJ., FieldD. T., WilkieR. M., & WannJ. P. (2010). An fMRI study of parietal cortex involvement in the visual guidance of locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1495–1507. doi:10.1037/a0018728
3.
BillingtonJ., WilkieR. M., & WannJ. P. (2013). Obstacle avoidance and smooth trajectory control: Neural areas highlighted during improved locomotor performance. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(Article 9), doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00009
4.
CloeteS. R., & WallisG. (2011). Visuomotor control of steering: The artefact of the matter. Experimental Brain Research, 208, 475–489. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2530-x
5.
CraigheroL., FadigaL., RizzolattiG., & UmiltàC. (1999). Action for perception: A motor-visual attentional effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1673–1692.
6.
DongesE. (1978). A two-level model of driver steering. Human Factors, 20, 691–707.
7.
GodthelpH. (1986). Vehicle control during curve driving. Human Factors, 28, 211–221.
KountouriotisG. K., FloydR. C., GardnerP. H., MeratN., & WilkieR. M. (2011). The role of gaze and road edge information during high-speed locomotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 687–702. doi:10.1037/a0026123
10.
LandM. F. (1998). The visual control of steering. In HarrisL. R. & JenkinM. (Eds.), Vision and action, (pp. 163–180). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
LandM., & HorwoodJ. (1995). Which parts of the road guide steering?. Nature, 377(6547), 339–340. doi:10.1038/377339a0
12.
LandM. F., & LeeD. N. (1994). Where we look when we steer?. Nature, 369(6483), 742–744. doi:10.1038/369742a0
13.
MarsF. (2008). Driving around bends with manipulated eye–steering coordination. Journal of Vision, 8(11, Article 10), doi:10.1167/8.11.10
14.
MarsF., & NavarroJ. (2012). Where we look when we drive with or without active steering wheel control. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43858
15.
MarsF., SalehL., ChevrelP., ClaveauF., LafayJ. F. (2011, September 19–23). Modeling the visual and motor control of steering with an eye to shared-control automation. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Las Vegas, NV, (pp. 1422–1426). HFES. Retrieved from http://www.hfes.org/publications/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=149
16.
MATLAB (Version 7.7) [Computer programme]. Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc. Retrieved from http://www.mathworks.com
17.
PlöchlM., & EdelmannJ. (2007). Driver models in automobile dynamics application. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45, 699–741. doi:10.1080/00423110701432482
18.
SalehL., ChevrelP., ClaveauF., LafayJ. F., & MarsF. (2013). Shared steering control between a driver and an automation: Stability in presence of driver model uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transport Systems, 14(2), 974–983. doi:10.1109/TITS.2013.2248363
19.
SalvucciD., & GrayR. (2004). A two-point visual control model of steering. Perception, 33, 1233–1248. doi:10.1068/p5343
ShinY. K., ProctorR. W., & CapaldiE. J. (2010). A review of contemporary ideomotor theory. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 943–974. doi:10.1037/a0020541
22.
Statistica (Version 8) [Computer programme]. StatSoft, Inc. (2007). Retrieved from http://www.statsoft.com/
23.
SteenJ., DamveldH. J., HappeeR., van PaassenM. M., & MulderM. (2011, October, 9–12). A review of visual driver models for system identification purposes. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Anchorage, AK, (pp. 2093–2100). IEEE. Retrieved from http://www.smc2011.org/
24.
SummalaH., NieminenT., & PuntoM. (1996). Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Human Factors, 38, 442–451. doi:10.1518/001872096778701944
25.
Team, R. D. C. (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer programme]. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
26.
WallisG., ChatziastrosA., & BülthoffH. H. (2002). An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control. Current Biology, 12, 295–299.
27.
WannJ. P., & SwappD. K. (2000). Why you should look where you are going. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 647–648. doi:10.1038/76602
28.
WilkieR. M., KountouriotisG. K., MeratN., & WannJ. P. (2010). Using vision to control locomotion: Looking where you want to go. Experimental Brain Research, 204, 539–347. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2321-4
29.
WolpertD. M., DiedrichsenJ., & FlanaganJ. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12, 739–751. doi:10.1038/nrn3112
30.
YuilleA., & KerstenD. (2006). Vision as Bayesian inference: Analysis by synthesis?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 301–308. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.002
