In a series of six experiments, the influence of frequency trajectory in visual word recognition was investigated. In Experiment 1, frequency trajectory was found to exert a strong and reliable influence on age of acquisition (AoA) ratings. In word reading (Experiment 2), lexical decision (Experiments 3 and 6), proper name decision (Experiment 4), progressive demasking (Experiment 5), and a multiple regression analysis of lexical decision times taken from the French Lexicon Project, the effect of frequency trajectory was not reliable. In contrast, in all the experiments and in the multiple regression analysis, cumulative frequency had a strong and reliable influence on word recognition times. The findings firmly establish that in alphabetic languages such as French, age-limited learning effects do not surface readily in word recognition. In contrast, the total exposure to words across the lifetime is a strong determinant of word recognition speed. The implications of the findings are discussed.
BaayenR.H.FeldmanL.B.SchreuderR. (2006). Morphological influences on the recognition of monosyllabic monomorphemic words.Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 290–313.
2.
BaayenR.H.PiepenbrockR.GulikersL. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM].Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
3.
BalotaD.A.PilottiM.CorteseM.J. (2001). Subjective frequency estimates for 2938 monosyllabic words.Memory & Cognition, 29, 639–647.
4.
BarbarottoR.LaiaconaM.CapitaniE. (2005). Objective versus estimated age of word acquisition: A study of 202 Italian children.Behavior Research Methods, 37, 644–650.
5.
BoninP.BarryC.MéotA.ChalardM. (2004). The influence of age of acquisition in word reading and other tasks: A never ending story?.Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 456–476.
6.
BoninP.ChalardM.MéotA.FayolM. (2001). Age-of-acquisition and word frequency in the lexical decision task: Further evidence from the French language.Current Psychology of Cognition, 20, 401–443.
7.
BoninP.MéotA.AubertL.MalardierN.NiedenthalP.Capelle-ToczekM.-C. (2003). Normes de concrétude de valeur d'imagerie, de fréquence subjective et de valence émotionnelle pour 866 mots [Norms of concreteness, imageability, subjective frequency and emotional valence for 866 words].L'Année Psychologique [Imageability: Norms and relationships with other psycholinguistic variables], 103, 655–694.
8.
BoninP.MéotA.FerrandL.RouxS. (2011). L'imageabilité: Normes et relations avec d'autres variables psycholinguistiques [Imageablity: norms and relationships with other psycholingwistic variables].L'Année Psychologique, 111, 327–357.
9.
BoninP.MéotA.MermillodM.FerrandL.BarryC. (2009). The effects of age of acquisition and frequency trajectory on object naming: Comments on Pérez (2007).Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2, 1132–1140.
10.
BrysbaertM.CorteseM.J. (2011). Do the effects of subjective frequency and age of acquisition survive better word frequency norms?.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 545–559.
11.
BrysbaertM.LangeM.van WijnendaeleI. (2000). The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 65–85.
BuraniC.ArduinoL.S.BarcaL. (2007). Frequency, not age of acquisition, affects Italian word naming.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 828–866.
14.
ButlerB.HainsS. (1979). Individual differences in word recognition.Memory and Cognition, 7, 68–76.
15.
CarreirasM.PereaM.GraingerJ. (1997). Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: Cross-task comparisons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 857–871.
16.
CarrollJ.B.DaviesP.RichmanB. (1971). The American heritage word-frequency book, CarrollJ.B.DaviesP.RichmanB.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
17.
CazaN.MoscovitchM. (2005). Effects of cumulative frequency, but not of frequency trajectory, in lexical decision times of older adults and patients with Alzheimer's disease.Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 456–471.
18.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
CohenJ.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 25, 257–271.
20.
ColomboL.BuraniC. (2002). The influence of age of acquisition, root frequency, and context availability in processing nouns and verbs.Brain and Language, 81, 398–411.
21.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.
22.
ColtheartV.LaxonV.J.KeatingC. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading.British Journal of Psychology, 79, 1–12.
23.
CorteseM.J.KhannaM.M. (2007). Age of acquisition predicts naming and lexical-decision performance above and beyond 22 other predictor variables: An analysis of 2,342 words.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1072–1082.
24.
CuetosF.BarbonA. (2006). Word naming in Spanish.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 415–436.
25.
DamianM. (2010). Does variability in human performance outweigh imprecision in response devices such as computer keyboards?.Behavior Research Methods, 42, 205–211.
26.
DentK.JohnstonR.A.HumphreysG.W. (2008). Age of acquisition and word frequency effects in picture naming: A dual-task investigation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 34, 282–301.
27.
DufauS.StevensM.GraingerJ. (2008). Windows executable software for the progressive demasking task (PDM).Behavior Research Methods, 40, 33–37.
28.
DunabeitiaJ.A.AvilésA.CarreirasM. (2008). NoA's ark: Influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 1072–1077.
29.
EllisA.W.Lambon RalphM.A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflects loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1103–1123.
30.
EvansG.A. L.Lambon RalphM.A.WoollamsA.M. (2012). What's in a word? A parametric study of semantic influences on visual word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 325–331.
31.
FerrandF.BoninP.MéotA.AugustinovaM.NewB.PallierC. (2008). Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1049–1054.
32.
FerrandL.NewB.BrysbaertM.KeuleersE.BoninP.MéotA. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords.Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496.
33.
ForsterK.I.ForsterJ.C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 35, 116–124.
34.
GerhandS.BarryC. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 24, 267–283.
35.
GerhandS.BarryC. (1999a). Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming.Cognition, 73, B27–B36.
36.
GerhandS.BarryC. (1999b). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.Memory & Cognition, 27, 592–602.
37.
GhyselinckM.De MoorW. & BrysbaertM. (2000). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2,816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 77–98.
38.
GhyselinckM.LewisM.B.BrysbaertM. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation.Acta Psychologica, 115, 43–67.
39.
GilhoolyK.J.LogieR.H. (1981). Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition.Current Psychological Research, 1, 251–262.
40.
GraingerJ.JacobsA.M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review, 103, 518–565.
41.
GraingerJ.ZieglerJ.C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing.Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 1–13.
42.
HarmM.W.SeidenbergM.S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models.Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.
43.
HarmM.W.SeidenbergM.S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.
44.
HavelkaJ.TomitaI. (2006). Age of acquisition in naming Japanese words.Visual Cognition, 13, 981–991.
45.
IzuraC.PérezM.AgallouE.WrightV. C.MarínJ.Stadthagen-GonzalezH. (2010). Age/order of acquisition effects and cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 32–58.
46.
JacobsA.M.GraingerJ. (1994). Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1311–1334.
47.
JohnstonR.BarryC. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing.Visual Cognition, 13, 789–845.
48.
JuhaszB.J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification.Psychological Bulletin, 131, 684–712.
49.
KeuleersE.LaceyP.RastleK.BrysbaertM. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.Behavior Research Methods, 44, 287–304.
50.
KučeraH.FrancisW.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English, Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
51.
Lambon RalphM.A.EhsanS. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence. Empirical and computational evidence.Visual Cognition, 13, 928–948.
52.
LétéB.PeeremanR.FayolM. (2008). Phoneme-to-grapheme consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study.Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 952–977.
53.
LétéB.Sprenger-CharollesL.ColéP. (2004). MANULEX: A grade-level lexical database from French elementary-school readers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 156–166.
54.
LiuY.Y.HaoM.L.HuaS.TanL.-H.WeekesB.S. (2008). Age of acquisition effects on oral reading in Chinese.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 344–350.
55.
MonaghanJ.EllisA.W. (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling–sound consistency in word naming?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 28, 183–206.
56.
MonaghanP.EllisA.W. (2010). Modeling reading development: Cumulative, incremental learning in a computational model of word naming.Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 506–525.
57.
MorrisonC.M.ChappellT.D.EllisA.W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 528–559.
58.
MorrisonC.M.EllisA.W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 116–133.
59.
MorrisonC.M.EllisA.W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision.British Journal of Psychology, 91, 167–180.
60.
MorrisonC.M.HirshK.W.ChappellT.EllisA.W. (2002). Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 14, 435–459.
61.
NewB.PallierC.BrysbaertM.FerrandL. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 516–524.
62.
PeeremanR.ContentA. (1999). Lexop. A lexical database with orthography–phonology statistics for French monosyllabic words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 376–379.
63.
PeeremanR.LétéB.Sprenger-CharollesL. (2007). Manulex-infra: Distributional characteristics of grapheme–phoneme mappings, infra-lexical and lexical units in child-directed written material.Behavior Research Methods, 39, 593–603.
64.
PerryC.ZieglerJ.ZorziM. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud.Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.
65.
PindJ.JonsdottirH.TryggvadottirH.B.JonssonF. (2000). Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: Name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 41–88.
66.
PlautD.C.McClellandJ.L.SeidenbergM.S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.
67.
RamanI. (2006). On the age-of-acquisition effects in word naming and orthographic transparency: Mapping specific or universal?.Visual Cognition, 13, 1044–1053.
68.
SeidenbergM.S.McClellandJ.L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
69.
SeidenbergM.S.WatersG.S. (1989). Word recognition and naming: A mega study.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 489.
70.
ShibaharaN.ZorziM.HillM.P.WydellT.ButterworthB. (2003). Semantic effects in word naming: Evidence from English and Japanese kanji.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 263–286.
71.
SibleyD. E.KelloC. T. & SeidenbergM. S. (2009). Error, error everywhere: A look at megastudies of word reading. In TaatgenN. & van RijnH. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2009 Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1036–1041). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
72.
SpielerD.H.BalotaD.A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level.Psychological Science, 8, 411–416.
73.
Stadthagen-GonzalezH.BowersJ.S.DamianM.F. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from expert vocabularies.Cognition, 93, B11–B26.
74.
Stadthagen-GonzalezH.DavisC.J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity.Behavior Research Methods, 38, 598–605.
75.
StewartN. & EllisA. W. (2008). Order of acquisition in learning perceptual categories: A laboratory analogue of the age of acquisition effect?Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 70–74.
76.
StrainE.PattersonK.SeidenbergM.S. (2002). Theories of word naming interact with spelling–sound consistency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 28, 207–214.
77.
TaftM.van GraanF. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic judgement task.Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203–224.
78.
TamminenJ.GaskellM.G. (2008). Newly learned spoken words show long-term lexical competition effects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 361–371.
79.
TurnerJ.E.ValentineT.EllisA.W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision.Memory & Cognition, 26, 1282–1291.
80.
WhaleyC.P. (1978). Word–nonword classification times.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143–154.
81.
ZenoS.M.IvensS.H.MillardR.T.DuvvuriR. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide, Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
82.
ZevinJ.D.SeidenbergM.S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks.Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 1–29.
83.
ZevinJ.D.SeidenbergM.S. (2004). Age of acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory.Memory & Cognition, 32, 31–38.
