How do we map number words to the magnitudes they represent? While much is known about the developmental trajectory of number word learning, the acquisition of the counting routine, and the academic correlates of estimation ability, previous studies have yet to describe the mechanisms that link number words to nonverbal representations of number. We investigated two mechanisms: associative mapping and structure mapping. Four dot array estimation tasks found that adults' ability to match a number word to one of two discriminably different sets declined as a function of set size and that participants' estimates of relatively large, but not small, set sizes were influenced by misleading feedback during an estimation task. We propose that subjects employ structure mappings for linking relatively large number words to set sizes, but rely chiefly on item-by-item associative mappings for smaller sets. These results indicate that both inference and association play important roles in mapping number words to approximate magnitudes.
AnsariD. (2008). Effects of development and enculturation on number representation in the brain.Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 278–291.
2.
AtkinsonJ.FrancisM.CampbellF. (1976). The dependence of the visual numerosity limit on orientation, colour, and grouping in the stimulus.Perception, 5, 3335–342.
3.
BarthH.KanjliaS.SlusserE.GarciaJ.ChaseE. (2011, October). Proportional reasoning and children's number-line estimation: The role of feedback, Abstract of paper presented at the Seventh Biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, Philadelphia, PA.
4.
BarthH.StarrA.SullivanJ. (2009). Children's mappings of large number words to numerosities.Cognitive Development, 24, 248–264.
5.
BatesD.SarkarD. (2007). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 Classes. R package (Version 0.9975-12) [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/.
CareyS. (2009). The origin of concepts, New York, NYOxford University Press.
8.
DavidsonK.EngK.BarnerD. (2012). Does learning to count involve a semantic induction?.Cognition, 123, 162–173.
9.
DehaeneS. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics, New York, NYOxford University Press.
10.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ. (1993). Development of elementary numerical abilities: A neuronal model.Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences, 5, 390–407.
11.
DehaeneS.IzardV.PiazzaM. (2005). Control over non-numerical parameters in numerosity experiments, Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from www.unicog.org.
12.
DehaeneS.MehlerJ. (1992). Cross-linguistic regularities in the frequency of number words.Cognition, 43, 1–29.
13.
FeigensonL.DehaeneS.SpelkeE. (2004). Core systems of number.TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 307–314.
14.
FrankM.BarnerD. (2012). Constructing exact visual representations of number.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 134–149.
15.
GentnerD. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science, 7, 155–170.
16.
GentnerD. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Science, 34, 752–775.
17.
GentnerD.NamyL. (2006). Analogical processes in language learning.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 297–301.
18.
IzardV.DehaeneS. (2008). Calibrating the mental number line.Cognition, 106, 1221–1247.
19.
Le CorreM.CareyS. (2007). One, two, three, four, nothing more: An investigation of the conceptual sources of the verbal counting principles.Cognition, 105, 395–438.
20.
LiptonJ.SpelkeE. (2005). Preschool children's mapping of number words to nonsymbolic numerosities.Child Development, 76, 978–988.
21.
MandlerG.SheboB.J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 111, 1–22.
22.
MundyE.GilmoreC. (2009). Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representation of number.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 490–502.
PiazzaM.PinelP.Le BihanD.DehaeneS. (2007). A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex.Neuron, 53, 293–305.
25.
R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, Vienna, AustriaR Foundation for Statistical Computing.
26.
ShumanM. (2007). Computational characterization of numerosity perception and encoding, (unpublished doctoral thesis). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
27.
SieglerR.BoothJ. (2004). Development of numerical estimation in young children.Child Development, 75, 428–444.
28.
SieglerR.RamaniG. (2009). Playing linear number board games—but not circular ones—improves low-income preschoolers' numerical understanding.Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 545–560.
29.
Stevens, S. (1957). On the psychophysical law. The Psychological Review, 64, 153–181.
30.
SullivanJ.BarnerD. (2012). Associative and inferential processes in the development of estimation in childhood, Manuscript in preparation.
31.
SullivanJ.JuhaszB.SlatteryT.BarthH. (2011). Adults' number-line estimation strategies: Evidence from eye movements.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18, 557–563.
32.
ThompsonC.OpferJ. (2010). How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: Effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition.Child Development, 81, 1768–1786.
33.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.Science, 185, 1124–1131.
34.
Van OeffelenM.VosP. (1982). Configurational effects on the enumeration of dots: Counting by groups.Memory & Cognition, 10, 4396–404.
35.
WhalenJ.GallistelC.GelmanR. (1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation.Psychological Science, 10, 130–137.
