How does encoding context affect memory? Participants studied visually presented words viewed concurrently with a rich (intact face) or weak (scrambled face) image as context and subsequently made “Remember”, “Know”, or “New” judgements to words presented alone. In Experiment 1a, younger, but not older, adults showed higher recollection accuracy to words from rich- than from weak-context encoding trials. The age-related deficit in recollection occurred, in Experiment 1b, even when encoding and retrieval time was doubled in older adults, suggesting that insufficient processing time cannot account for this age-related deficit. In Experiment 1c, dividing attention in young, during encoding, reduced overall memory, though the recollection boost from rich encoding contexts remained, suggesting that reduced attention resources cannot explain this age-related deficit. Experiment 2 showed that an own-age bias, to face images as context, could not explain the age-related differences either. Results suggest that age deficits in recollection stem from a lack of spontaneous binding, or elaboration, of context to target information during encoding.
AnastasiJ.S.RhodesM.G. (2006). Evidence for an own-age bias in face recognition.North American Journal of Psychology, 8, 237–253.
2.
AtkinsonR.C.JuolaJ.F. (1974). Search and decision processes in recognition memory.Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology: I. Learning, memory and thinking, KrantzD.H.AtkinsonR.C.LuceR.D.SuppesP. (p. 299). W. H. FreemanOxford, UK.
3.
BaayenR.H.PiepenbrockR.GulikersL. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (Release 2) [CD-ROM].Philadelphia, PAUniversity of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
4.
BäckmanL. (1991). Recognition memory across the adult life span: The role of prior knowledge.Memory & Cognition, 19, 63–71.
5.
BaddeleyA.D. (1982). Domains of recollection.Psychological Review, 89, 708–729.
6.
BartlettJ.C.LeslieJ.E. (1986). Aging and memory for faces versus single views of faces.Memory & Cognition, 14, 371–381.
7.
BlairJ.R.SpreenO. (1989). Predicting premorbid IQ: A revision of the National Adult Reading Test.The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 3, 129–136.
8.
ChalfonteB.L.JohnsonM.K. (1996). Feature memory and binding in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition, 24, 403–416.
9.
CohnM.EmrichS.M.MoscovitchM. (2008). Age-related deficits in associative memory: The influence of impaired strategic retrieval.Psychology and Aging, 23, 93–103.
10.
CookG.I.MarshR.L.HicksJ.L. (2006). The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.Memory & Cognition, 34, 240–250.
11.
CraikF.I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In Human memory and cognitive capabilities, mechanisms, and performances.KlixF.HagendorfH.(pp. 409–422) North HollandElsevier.
12.
CraikF.I. M. (2006). Remembering items and their contexts: Effects of aging and divided attention.Handbook of binding and memory: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience, ZimmerH.D.MecklingerA.LindenbergerU. (pp.315–338) Oxford, UKOxford University Press.
13.
CraikF.I. M.GovoniR.Naveh-BenjaminM.AndersonN.D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.
14.
CraikF.I. M.LuoL.SakutaY. (2010). Effects of aging and divided attention on memory for items and their contexts.Psychology and Aging, 25, 968–979.
15.
CraikF.I. M.McDowdJ.M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 13, 474–479.
16.
DaltonP. (1993). The role of stimulus familiarity in context-dependent recognition.Memory & Cognition, 21, 223–234.
17.
DianaR.A.RederL.N.ArndtJ.ParkH. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favour of a dual-process account.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1–21.
18.
EichE. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 11, 764–770.
19.
FernandesM.A.MoscovitchM. (2000). Divided attention and memory: Evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 155–176.
20.
FernandezA.GlenbergA.M. (1985). Changing environmental context does not reliably affect memory.Memory & Cognition, 13, 333–345.
21.
FolsteinM.F.FolsteinS.F.McHughP.R. (1975). Mini-Mental State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
GardinerJ.M.JavaR.I.Richardson-KlavehnA. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114–122.
24.
GoddenD.R.BaddeleyA.D. (1975). Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: On land and underwater.British Journal of Psychology, 66, 325–331.
25.
HarleyE.M.DillonA.M.LoftusG.R. (2004). Why is it difficult to see in the fog? How stimulus contrast affects visual perception and visual memory.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 197–231.
26.
HarrisonV.HoleG.J. (2009). Evidence for a contact-based explanation of the own-age bias in face recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 264–269.
27.
HenkelL.A.JohnsonM.K.De LeonardisD.M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268.
28.
HoyerW.J.VerhaeghenP. (2006). Memory aging.Handbook of the psychology of aging 6, BirrenJ.E.SchaireK.W.Amsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier209–232.
29.
JacobyL.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory.Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513–541.
30.
JohnsonM.K. (1992). MEM: Mechanisms of recollection.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Special Issue: Memory systems, 4, 268–280.
KilbA.Naveh-BenjaminM. (2007). Paying attention to binding: Further studies assessing the role of reduced attentional resources in the associative deficit of older adults.Memory & Cognition, 35, 1162–1174.
33.
LamontA.C.Stewart-WilliamsS.PoddJ. (2005). Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load.Memory & Cognition, 33, 1017–1024.
34.
LightL.L.PrullM.W.La VoieD.J.HealyM.R. (2000). Dual-process theories of memory in old age.Models of cognitive aging, PerfectT.J.MaylorE.A.New York, NYOxford University Press238–300.
35.
LindholmT. (2005). Own-age biases in verbal person memory.Memory, 13, 21–30.
36.
LoftusG.R. (1985). Picture perception: Effects of luminance on available information and information-extraction rate.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 342–356.
37.
LuoL.CraikF.I. M. (2009). Age differences in recollection: Specificity effects at retrieval.Journal of Memory and Language, 60, 421–436.
38.
LuoL.HendriksT.CraikF.I. M. (2007). Age differences in recollection: Three patterns of enhanced encoding.Psychology & Aging, 22, 269–280.
39.
MandlerG. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.Psychological Review, 87, 252–271.
40.
McIntyreJ.S.CraikF.I. M. (1987). Age differences in memory for item and source information.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 41, 175–192.
41.
Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 630–633.
42.
MurnaneK.PhelpsM.P.MalmbergK. (1999). Context-dependent recognition memory: The ICE theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 403–415.
43.
Naveh-BenjaminM. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associate deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1170–1187.
44.
Naveh-BenjaminM.GuezJ.ShulmanS. (2004). Older adults' associative deficit in episodic memory: Assessing the role of decline in attentional resources.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1067–1073.
45.
Naveh-BenjaminM.HussainZ.GuezJ.Bar-OnM. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 29, 826–837.
46.
NelsonH.E. (1982). National Adult Reading Test (NART): Test manual.Windsor, UKNelson.
47.
OldS.R.Naveh-BenjaminM. (2008). Memory for people and their actions: Further evidence for an age-related associative deficit.Psychology and Aging, 23, 467–472.
48.
PerfectT.J.HarrisL.J. (2003). Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending?.Memory & Cognition, 31, 570–580.
49.
PerfectT.J.MayesA.R.DownesJ.J.VanEijkR. (1996). Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory?.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 49, 797–813.
50.
PerfectT.J.MoonH.C. (2005). The own-age effect in face recognition.Measuring the mind: Speed, control, and age, DuncanJ.McLeodP.PhillipsL.H.Oxford, UKOxford University Press317–339.
51.
SalthouseT.A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.Psychological Review, 103, 403–428.
52.
SchacterD.L.KaszniakA.W.KihlstromJ.F.ValdiserriM. (1991). The relation between source memory and aging.Psychology and Aging, 6, 559–568.
53.
SkinnerE.I.FernandesM.A. (2008). Interfering with remembering and knowing: Effects of divided attention at retrieval.Acta Psychologica, 127, 211–221.
54.
SkinnerE.I.FernandesM.A. (2009). Age-related changes in the use of study context to increase recollection.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 16, 377–400.
55.
SmithS.M.VelaE. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220.
56.
SpencerW.D.RazN. (1995). Differential effects of aging on memory for content and context: A meta-analysis.Psychology and Aging, 10, 527–539.
57.
TulvingE. (1985). Memory and consciousness.Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12.
WickensC.D.Information processing, decision-making, and cognition.Handbook of human factors, SalvendyG. (1987). Oxford, UKJohn Wiley & Sons72–107.
60.
WieseH.SchweinbergerS.R.HansenK. (2008). The age of the beholder: ERP evidence of an own-age bias in face memory.Neuropsychologia, 46, 2973–2985.
61.
WrightD.B.StroudJ.N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age.Law and Human Behavior, 20, 641–654.
62.
YonelinasA.P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity.Memory & Cognition, 25, 747–763.
63.
YonelinasA.P. (2001). Consciousness, control, and confidence: The three Cs of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 361–379.
64.
YonelinasA.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research.Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.
65.
YonelinasA.P.JacobyL.L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency.Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 622–643.
