Digraphs are graphemes that are composed of two letters like the “ou” in “soup”. We hypothesized that the serial-reading strategy of dyslexic readers might interfere with the processing of digraphs. We used a letter-detection task to compare the processing of vowel digraphs in dyslexic and typical-reading children. Both groups were found to be slower in detecting a letter within a vowel digraph than in detecting a letter of a single-letter grapheme. The slower response to target letters embedded in a digraph was position independent in both groups. We also found that dyslexic children did not differ from typical-reading children in the detection of letters in words. These results indicate that typical-reading and dyslexic children process vowel digraphs as perceptual units and that dyslexic children do not show impairments in this early visual process.
AndrewsS.WoollamsA.BondR. (2005). Spelling–sound typicality only affects words with digraphs: Further qualifications to the generality of the regularity effect on word naming.Journal of Memory and Language53, 4567–593.
2.
BaayenR. H.PiepenbrockR.van RijnH. (1993). CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]., Philadelphia: PA: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
3.
BalotaD. A.CorteseM. J.Sergent-MarshallS. D.SpielerD. H. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General133, 283–316.
4.
BergmannJ.WimmerH. (2008). A dual-route perspective on poor reading in a regular orthography: Evidence from phonological and orthographic lexical decisions.Cognitive Neuropsychology25, 653–676.
5.
BleichrodtN. D.DrenthP. J. D.ZaalJ. N.ResingW. C. M. (1987). Revisie Amsterdamse Kinder Intelligentie Test [Revised Amsterdam Child Intelligence Test]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
6.
BorgwaldtS. R.HellwigF. M.de GrootA. M. B. (2004). Word-initial entropy in five languages.Written Language & Literacy7, 2165–184.
7.
BosmanA. M. T.van LeerdamM.de GelderB. (2000). The /O/ in OVER is different from the /O/ in OTTER: Phonological effects in children with and without dyslexia.Developmental Psychology36, 817–825.
8.
BrandM.GirouxI.PuijalonC.ReyA. (2007). Syllable onsets are perceptual reading units.Memory and Cognition35, 966–973.
9.
BrusB. T.VoetenM. J. M. (1995). Eén minuut test [One minute test]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
10.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. C. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review108, 204–256.
11.
DavisC.BryantP. (2006). Causal connections in the acquisition of an orthographic rule: A test of Uta Frith's developmental hypothesis.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry47, 8849–856.
12.
de LucaM.BorelliM.JudicaA.SpinelliD.ZoccolottiP. (2002). Reading words and pseudowords: An eye movement study of developmental dyslexia.Brain and Language80, 617–626.
13.
ElbroC. (2005). Literacy acquisition in Danish: A deep orthography in cross-linguistic light.Handbook of orthography and literacy, JoshiR. M.AaronP. G.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates31–46.
14.
GrossJ.TreimanR.InmanJ. (2000). The role of phonology in a letter detection task.Memory and Cognition28, 349–357.
15.
HawelkaS.GaglB.WimmerH. (2010). A dual-route perspective on eye movements of dyslexic readers.Cognition115, 367–379.
16.
HawelkaS.HuberC.WimmerH. (2006). Impaired visual processing of letter and digit strings in adult dyslexic readers.Vision Research46, 718–723.
17.
HawelkaS.WimmerH. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading.Vision Research45, 855–863.
18.
HawelkaS.WimmerH. (2008). Visual target detection is not impaired in dyslexic children.Vision Research48, 850–852.
19.
HealyA. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review1, 3333–344.
20.
HoffmanL.RovineM. J. (2007). Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: Foundations and illustrative examples.Behavior Research39, 101–117.
21.
JacksonN. E.ColtheartM. (2001). Dual-route theories of reading.Routes to reading success and failure: Toward an integrated cognitive psychology of atypical reading, Ann Arbor, MI: Sheridan Books39–70.
22.
MaasC. J. M.SnijdersT. A. B. (2003). The multilevel approach to repeated measures for complete and incomplete data.Quality and Quantity37, 71–89.
23.
MarinusE.de JongP. F. (2008). The use of sublexical clusters in normal and dyslexic readers.Scientific Studies of Reading12, 253–280.
24.
Marinus, E., & de Jong, P. F. (in press). Variability in the word-reading performance of dyslexic readers: Effects of letter length, phoneme length and digraph presence, Cortex.
25.
PactonS.PerruchetP.FayolM.CleeremansA. (2001). Implicit learning out of the lab: The case of orthographic regularities.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General130, 401–426.
26.
PeeremanR.BrandM.ReyA. (2006). Letter-by-letter processing in the phonological conversion of multiletter graphemes: Searching for sounds in printed pseudowords.Psychological Bulletin & Review13, 38–44.
27.
PerryC.ZieglerJ. C.ZorziM. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud.Psychological Review2, 273–315.
28.
QuenéH.van den BergH. (2004). On multi-level modeling of data from repeated measures designs: A tutorial.Speech Communication43, 103–121.
29.
RasbashJ.SteeleF.BrowneW.ProsserB. (2004). A user's guide to MLwiN Version 2.0, London: Institute of Education.
30.
RastleK.ColtheartM. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading.Psychological Bulletin & Review5, 277–282.
31.
RavenJ. C.CourtJ. H.RavenJ. (1986). Standard progressive matrices, London: H. K. Lewis & Co.
32.
ReyA.SchillerN. O. (2005). Graphemic complexity and multiple print-to-sound associations in visual word recognition.Memory and Cognition33, 176–85.
33.
ReyA.ZieglerJ. C.JacobsA. M. (2000). Graphemes are perceptual reading units.Cognition75, B1–B12.
34.
RichterT. (2006). What is wrong with ANOVA and multiple regression? Analyzing sentence reading times with hierarchical linear models.Discourse Processes41, 221–250.
35.
SavageR.StuartM. (2006). A developmental model of reading acquisition based upon early scaffolding errors and subsequent vowel inferences.Educational Psychology26, 33–53.
36.
SchrootenW.VermeerA. (1994). Woorden in het basisonderwijs: 15.000 woorden aangeboden aan leerlingen [Words in primary education: 15.000 words presented to students], Tilburg, The Netherlands: TUP.
37.
Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., et al. (1998). Functional disruption in the organization of the brain for reading in dyslexia. Neurobiology, 95, 2636–2641.
38.
SpinelliD.de LucaM.di FilippoG.ManciniM.MartelliM.ZoccolottiP. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers.Developmental Neuropsychology27, 217–235.
39.
ThalerV.UrtonK.HeineA.HawelkaS.EnglV.JacobsA. M. (2009). Different behavior and eye movement patterns of dyslexic readers with and without attentional deficits during single word reading.Neuropsychologia47, 2436–2445.
40.
ValdoisS.BosseM.-L.TainturierM.-J. (2004). The cognitive deficits responsible for developmental dyslexia: Review of evidence for a selective visual attentional disorder.Dyslexia10, 339–363.
41.
WimmerH. (1993). Characteristics of developmental dyslexia in a regular writing system.Applied Psycholinguistics14, 1–33.
42.
ZieglerJ. C.PerryC.JacobsA. M.Ma-WyattA.LadnerD.Schulte-KörneG. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: Language-specific or universal?.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology86, 169–193.
43.
ZoccolottiP.de LucaM.di PaceE.GasperiniF.JudicaA.SpinelliD. (2005). Word length effect in early reading and in developmental dyslexia.Brain and Language93, 369–373.
