Experiments have shown that hesitation increases both before and during speech concerned with the solution of verbal tasks which involve an increasing degree of syntactic or semantic complexity. These experiments have been concerned with differences between tasks. An attempt is made to compare hesitation time between individuals who are set the same tasks, in terms of the quality of their responses to the tasks. Individual dispositions to a characteristic speech-silence ratio complicate such comparisons. Here a strong trend was found between the quality of the subjects' responses and the extra time they took over and above their characteristic speech-silence ratios.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Goldman-EislerF. (1956). The determinants of the rate of speech output and their mutual relations. J. Psychosomatic Res.2, 137–43.
2.
Goldman-EislerF. (1958). Speech production and the predictability of words in context. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.10, 96–106.
3.
Goldman-EislerF. (1961). Hesitation and information in speech. Information TheoryCherryC.London162–174.
4.
Goldman-EislerF.SkarbekA.HendersonA. (1965). The effect of chlorpromazine on speech behaviour. Psychopharmacologia7, 220–9.
5.
Goldman-EislerF.MendozaR. (1965). Automatic pause-time recording, counting and totallising equipment Public Health Reports, U.S.A.
6.
JonckheereA. R. (1954). A test of significance for the relation between “m” rankings and “k” ranked categories. Brit. J. stat. Psychol.7, 93–100.
7.
MillerG. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. Amer. Psychol.17, 748–62.
8.
MillerG. A. (1964). Language and psychology. New Directions in the Study of LanguageLennebergE. H.Cambridge, Mass.
9.
MillerG. A.McKeanK. O. (1964). A chronometric study of some relations between sentences. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.16, 297–307.
