Overtraining and Transfer within and between Dimensions in the Rat

Abstract

Although reversal learning in the rat is normally assisted by overtraining, it seems that transfer to a new discrimination in a different stimulus dimension is not. This effect is confirmed in the present experiment, even though the stimuli of the second problem had been present (and necessarily attended to) in the first problem. This result is taken to show that the effects of overtraining cannot be accounted for by supposing that it strengthens an overt orienting response of the animal. A second group of rats was run to show that transfer to a second discrimination problem within the same dimension as the first is facilitated by overtraining. The important variable, therefore, that determines the direction of the effect of overtraining on transfer between problems, is the relationship between the stimulus dimensions concerned.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brookshire

K. H.

Warren

J. M.

Ball

C. G.

(1961). Reversal and transfer learning following overtraining in rat and chicken. J. comp. physiol. Physiol. 54, 98–102.

Capaldi

E. J.

Stevenson

H. W.

(1957). Response reversal following different amounts of overtraining. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 50, 195–8.

Goodwin

W. R.

Lawrence

D. H.

(1955). The functional independence of two discrimination habits associated with a constant stimulus situation. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 437–43.

Harlow

H. F.

(1959). Learning set and error factor theory. Psychology: a study of a science Koch

New York Vol. 2, 492–537Study I.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1962). The effects of overtraining on a reversal and a non-reversal shift. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 55, 555–59.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1963a). The effect of irrelevant cues on reversal learning in the rat. Brit. J. Psychol 54, 127–34.

Mackintosh

N. J.

(1963b). Direct transfer from a horizontal-vertical discrimination to a brightness discrimination in the rat. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 15, 212–3.

Pubols

B. H.

Jr. (1956). The facilitation of visual and spatial discrimination reversal by overlearning. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 48, 243–8.

Reid

L. S.

(1953). The development of noncontinuity behaviour through continuity learning. J. exp. Psychol. 46, 107–12.

10.

Ritchie

B. F.

Hay

Hare

(1951). Studies in spatial learning: IX. A dispositional analysis of response-performance. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 44, 442–9.

11.

Spence

K. W.

(1936). The nature of discrimination learning in animals. Psychol. Rev. 43, 427–49.

12.

Spence

K. W.

(1940). Continuous versus non-continuous interpretations of discrimination learning. Psychol. Rev. 47, 271–88.

13.

Sutherland

N. S.

Stimulus analysing mechanisms. Proceedings of a Symposium on the Mechanisation of Thought Processes. London 1959 Vol. II 575–609.