BergmanR.GibsonJ. J. (1959). The negative after-effect of the perception of a surface slanted in the third dimension. Amer. J. Psychol.72, 364–74.
2.
DitchburnR. W.PritchardR. M. (1960). Binocular vision with two stabilized reginal images. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.12, 26–32.
3.
GibsonJ. J.RadnerM. (1937). Adaptation, after-effects and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. J. exp. Psychol.20, 453–67.
4.
GogelW. C. (1956). The tendency to see objects as equidistant and its inverse relation to lateral separation. Psychol. Monogr.70, No. 4(Whole No. 411).
5.
HarkerG. S. (1962). Apparent frontoparallel plane, stereoscopic correspondence, and induced cyclotorsion of the eyes. Percept. Mot. Skills14, 75–87.
6.
HowardI. P. (1961). An investigation of a satiation process in the reversible perspective of revolving skeletal shapes. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.13, 19–33.
7.
KöhlerW.EmeryD. A. (1947). Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. Amer. J. Psychol.60, 159–201.
8.
KünnapasT. (1960). Scales for subjective distance. Scand. J. Psychol.1, 187–92.
9.
LitA. (1959). The effect of fixation conditions on depth discrimination at scotopic and photopic illumination levels. J. exp. Psychol.58, 476–81.
10.
OgleK. N. (1946). The binocular depth contrast phenomenon. Amer. J. Psychol.59, 111–26.
11.
OgleK. N.WeilM. P. (1958). Stereoscopic vision and the duration of the stimulus. A.M.A. Arch. Ophthal.59, 4–17.
12.
WernerH. (1938). Binocular depth contrast and the conditions of the binocular field. Amer. J. Psychol.51, 489–97.
