A terrapin will dive off a platform into water. This response was used in a simple apparatus with alternative water compartments to study discriminations. A white side was chosen in preference to a black side. By introducing shock it was possible to reverse this or, in some animals, inhibit diving-in. The variability of terrapins and the limitations and advantages of the present method for training them are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonP. K. (1958). The photic responses and water-approach behaviour of hatchling turtles. Copeia211–5.
2.
BoycottB. B.GuilleryR. W. (1962). Olfactory and visual learning in the red-eared terrapin, Pseudemys scripta elegans (Wied). J. exp. Biol.39, 567–77.
3.
BoycottB. B.RobinsM. W. (1961). The care of young red-eared terrapins (Pseudemys scripta elegans) in the laboratory. Brit. J. Herpetol.2, 206–10.
4.
CasteelD. B. (1911). The discriminative ability of the painted turtle. J. Anim. Behav.1, 1–28.
5.
EdwardsA. A.MrosovskyN. (1964). Electric shock and reduced weight gain in the terrapin, Pseudemys ornata callirostris. Brit. J., Herpetol. in press.
6.
GibsonE. J.WalkR. D. (1960). The “visual cliff.”. Sci. Amer.202, 64–71.
7.
GonzalezR. C.BittermanM. E. (1962). A further study of partial reinforcement in the turtle. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.14, 109–12.
8.
KirkK. L.BittermanM. E. (1963). Habit reversal in the turtle. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.15, 52–7.
9.
NobleG. K.BreslauA. M. (1938). The senses involved in the migration of young fresh-water turtles after hatching. J. comp. Psychol.25, 175–93.
10.
YerkesR. M. (1901). The formation of habits in the turtle. Pop. Sci. Mon.58, 519–25.
