Ten experiments are reported. In each the effect of a heteromodal stimulus on visual sensitivity is investigated. With one exception all the stimuli produced a small increase in visual sensitivity. A number of possible explanations of intersensory facilitation are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdrianE. D. (1942). Olfactory reactions in the brain of the hedgehog. J. Physiol.100, 459–73.
2.
AdrianE. D. (1943). Discharges from the vestibular receptors in the cat. J. Physiol.101, 389.
3.
AllenW. F. (1932). Formatio reticularis and reticulospinal tracts, their visceral functions and possible relationships to tonicity and clonic contractions. J. Wash. Acad. Sci.22, 490–5.
4.
von BoninG.GarolH. W.McCullochW. S. (1942). The functional organization of the occipital lobe. Biol. Symposia7, 165.
5.
BornsteinW. (1936). On the functional relations of the sense organs to one another, and to the organism as a whole. J. gen. Psychol.15, 117–31.
6.
BrainR. (1959). The Nature of Experience.London.
7.
BrodalA. (1956). The Reticular Formation of the Brain Stem.Edinburgh.
8.
GerebtzoffM. A. (1940). Recherches sur la projection corticale du labyrinthe. 1. Des effets de la stimulation labyrinthique sur l'activité éléctrique de l'écorce cerebrate. Arch. internat. Physiol.50, 59–99.
9.
GilbertG. M. (1941). Intersensory facilitation and inhibition. J. gen. Psychol.24, 381–407.
10.
GreenspoonJ. (1950). The Effect of Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli on the Frequency of Members of Two Verbal Response ClassesUniversity of Indiana Unpublished doctors dissertation.
11.
GreggL. W.BrogdenW. J. (1952). The effect of simultaneous stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol.43, 179–86.
12.
HarrisJ. D. (1950). Some Relations Between Vision and Audition.Illinois.
13.
HartmannG. W. (1933a). The increase in visual acuity in one eye through the illumination of the other. J. exp. Psychol.16, 383–92.
14.
HartmannG. W. (1933b). Changes in visual acuity through simultaneous stimulation of other sense organs. J. exp. Psychol.16, 393–407.
15.
HartmannG. W. (1935). Gestalt Psychology.New York.
16.
HerrickJ. (1927). An Introduction to Neurology 4th Edition Philadelphia.
17.
JasperH. (1936). Cortical excitatory state and synchronism in the control of bioelectric autonomous rhythms. Symposia Quantiative Biol.4, 320–32.
18.
JasperH.Ajmone-MarsanC.StollJ. (1952). Corticofugal projections to the brain stem. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.67, 155–66.
19.
JohnsonH. M. (1920). The dynamogenic influences of light on tactile discrimination. Psychobiol.2, 351–74.
20.
KravkovS. V. (1934). Changes in visual acuity in one eye under the influence of the illumination of the other, or acoustic stimuli. J. exp. Psychol.17, 805–12.
21.
LashleyK. S. (1952). Symposium on Brain and Mind. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.67, 196.
22.
LondonI. D. (1954). Research on sensory interaction in the Soviet Union. Psychol. Bull.51, 531–68.
23.
MoruzziB.MagounH. W. (1949). Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.1, 455–73.
24.
RyanT. (1940). Interrelations of the sensory systems. Psychol. Bull.37, 659–98.
25.
SchwartzL. A. (1957). Raising the sensitivity of the visual analyser. SimonB.Psychology in the Soviet UnionLondon.
26.
SpiegelE. A. (1934). The electroencephalogram of the cortex on stimulation of the labyrinth. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.31, 3.
27.
ThorneF. C. (1934). The psychophysical measurement of the temporal course of visual sensitivity. Arch. Psychol.170, 1–66.
28.
ThompsonR. F.VossJ. F.BrogdenW. J. (1958). Effect of brightness of simultaneous visual stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol.55, 45–50.
29.
WernerH. (1926). Einführung in die Entwicklungpsychologie.Leipzig.
