Size-Weight Interaction in Judgements of Compound Stimuli

Abstract

Recent work in the fields of multidimensional information transmission and perceptual accentuation due to value has led to theories concerning unidimensional judgements of compound stimuli. The present study attempts to explore these theories, adding the dimension of size to judged weight, following negative results with judgements of size when brightness is varied.

Three sets of stimulus objects were prepared. Variation of weight was the same in each set. However, the size of the objects was the same in one set, while in another set size increased with weight, and in a third set size and weight were negatively correlated. Three groups of 16 subjects were asked to make replicated absolute judgements of the weights in each set.

It appeared that judgements of weight are more affected by density when density varies than when changes of size produce constant density. As predicted, contrast between successive stimuli is greatest when size and weight are negatively correlated, and least with positive correlation. The extent of the judged scales, and the means of these scales, follow the same pattern. Differences in discriminability between the three series, whilst in the expected direction, are not significant. The hypothesis that these effects would be more apparent in the psychologically linked dimensions of size and weight, than in the relatively neutral case of size and brightness, was largely confirmed. These findings both amplify and modify the previous suggestions concerning compound stimuli.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alluisi

E. A.

(1957). Conditions affecting the amount of information in absolute judgements. Psychol. Rev. 64, 97–103.

Ansbacher

(1937). Perception of number as affected by the monetary value of the objects. Arch. Psychol. N.Y. No. 215.

Bruner

J. S.

Goodman

C. C.

(1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 42, 33–44.

Bruner

J. S.

Rodrigues

J. S.

(1953). Some determinants of apparent size. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol. 48, 17–24.

Carter

L. F.

Schooler

(1949). Value, need and other factors in perception. Psychol. Rev. 56, 200–7.

Dukes

W. F.

Bevan

(1952). Accentuation and response variability in the perception of personally relevant objects. J. Personality 20, 457–65.

Eriksen

C. W.

Hake

H. W.

(1955a). Absolute judgements as a function of stimulus range and number of stimulus and response categories. J. exp. Psychol. 49, 323–32.

Eriksen

C. W.

Hake

H. W.

(1955b). Multidimensional differences and accuracy of discrimination. J. exp. Psychol. 50, 153–60.

Howard

I. P.

(1954). An experimental and theoretical analysis of the size-weight illusion. Durham Res. Rev. 1, No. 5 47–53.

10.

Huang

(1945a). The size-weight illusion in relation to the perceptual constancies. J. gen. Psychol. 33, 43–63.

11.

Huang

(1945b). The size-weight illusion and the “weight-density illusion.”. J. gen. Psychol. 33, 65–84.

12.

Lambert

W. W.

Solomon

R. L.

Watson

P. D.

(1949). Reinforcement and extinction as factors in size estimation. J. exp. Psychol. 39, 637–41.

13.

McCurdy

H. G.

(1956). Coin perception studies and the concept of schemata. Psychol. Rev. 63, 160–8.

14.

Messenger

J. F.

(1902). How many dollar bills will equal in weight a five-dollar gold piece?. Science 15, 672–3.

15.

Miller

G. A.

(1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychol. Rev. 63, 81–97.

16.

Nyssen

Bourdon

(1956). A new contribution to the experimental study of the size-weight illusion. Acta Psychol. 12, 157–73.

17.

Pollack

(1952). The information of elementary auditory displays. J. acoust. Soc. Amer. 24, 745–9.

18.

Ryan

T. A.

(1940). Interrelations of the sensory systems in perception. Psychol. Bull. 37, 659–98.

19.

Sluckin

Holding

D. H.

(1959). Judgements of compound stimuli. Durham Res. Rev. 2, No. 10 303–9.

20.

Tajfel

(1957). Value and the perceptual judgement of magnitude. Psychol. Rev. 64, 192–204.

21.

Tajfel

(1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. Brit. J. Psychol. 50, 16–29.

22.

Thoulesss

R. H.

(1931). Phenomenal regression to the “real” object, II. Brit. J. Psychol. 22, 1–30.