When the human subject is asked to respond to two stimuli separated by a very short time interval the response to the second stimulus may be relatively delayed. The present experiment is designed to test the hypothesis that the elements of the delay attributable to the sensory and motor components of the stimulus-response situation may be subserved by relatively independent neural mechanisms. The results obtained are compatible with this hypothesis and are briefly discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DavisR. (1956). The limits of the “Psychological Refractory Period,”. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.8, 24–38.
2.
ElithornA.LawrenceC. (1955). Central inhibition: some refractory observations. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.7, 116–127.
3.
HallidayA. M.KerrM.ElithornA. (1960). Grouping of stimuli and apparent exceptions to the Psychological Refractory Period. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.12, 72–89.
4.
HickW. E.WelfordA. T. (1956). Central inhibition: some refractory observations. Comments on the paper by Alick Elithorn and Catherine Lawrence, 1955. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.8, 39–41.
5.
LeonardJ. A. (1958). Partial advance information in a choice reaction task. Brit. J. Psychol.49, 89–96.
6.
PoultonE. C. (1950). Perceptual anticipation and reaction time. Quart. J. exp. Psychol.2, 99–112.
7.
WelfordA. T. (1952). The “Psychological Refractory Period,” and the timing of high speed performance. A review and a theory. Brit. J. Psychol.43, 2–19.
