Retroactive Raising of a Sensory Threshold by a Contralateral Stimulus

Abstract

In an experiment designed to extend Howarth and Treisman's recent observations on the lowering of the visual and auditory threshold produced by a warning stimulus, it has been found that the threshold to electrical stimulation of one forearm is raised by a similar stimulus on the other forearm. As in the earlier experiments the “warning” was effective if it came 100 millisec. before or after the threshold stimulus. The effect increased with increasing warning strength over the range of five near-threshold strengths used.

These results appear to be inconsistent with the explanation previously proposed to account for the retroactive lowering of threshold. This suggested that the warning was acting simply as a marker, reducing the subject's uncertainty as to when the stimulus was coming. The fact that the rise in threshold was also induced retroactively shows that some interaction must be occurring in the central processes concerned in perception, and that it cannot be explained in terms of attenuation of the afferent volley.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adrian

E. D.

(1958). The control of the nervous system by the sense organs. Archiv, Psychiat. Nervenkrank 196, 482–93.

Alajouanine

Th.

Scherrer

Barbizet

Calvet

Verley

(1958). Potentiels évoqués corticaux chez des sujets atteints de troubles somesthésiques. Revue neurol. 98, 757–62.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1950). Stimulus intensity and attention in relation to learning theory. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 2, 71–5.

Brazier

M. A. B.

(1954). The action of anaesthetics on the nervous system. Brain Mechanisms and Consciousness Delafresnaye

J. F.

Oxford.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1957). A mechanical model for human attention and immediate memory. Psychol. Rev. 64, 205–15.

Crawford

B. H.

(1947). Visual adaptation in relation to brief conditioning stimuli. Proc. roy. Soc., B 134, 283–302.

Dawson

G. D.

(1958). The central control of sensory inflow. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 51, 531–5.

Giblin

D. R.

(1960). The effects of lesions of the nervous system on cerebral responses to peripheral nerve stimulation. Electroenceph clin. Neurophysiol. 12, 262.

Gregg

L. W.

Brogden

W. J.

(1952). The effect of simultaneous visual stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol. 43, 179–86.

10.

Howarth

C. I.

Treisman

(1958). The effect of warning interval on the electric phosphene and auditory thresholds. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 10, 130–41.

11.

Ingham

J. G.

(1957). The effect upon monaural sensitivity of continuous stimulation of the opposite ear. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 9, 52–60.

12.

Thomson

R. F.

Voss

J. F.

Brogden

W. J.

(1958). Effect of brightness of simultaneous visual stimulation on absolute auditory sensitivity. J. exp. Psychol. 55, 45–50.

13.

Treisman

Howarth

C. I.

(1959). Changes in threshold level produced by a signal preceding or following the threshold stimulus. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 11, 129–42.

14.

Woodrow

(1930). The reproduction of temporal intervals. J. exp. Psychol. 13, 473–99.