Choice Reaction Times for Skilled Responses *

Abstract

Two kinds of choice reaction time experiments are reported, both of which make use of a highly overlearned sensori-motor response. When a response is required for each stimulus presented, no increase in reaction time occurs as a function of the number of alternative stimuli available. It is proposed that the increase in choice reaction times commonly thought to accompany an increase in the number of alternative choices provided reflects the unpractised state of the responder. When a response is required for only one out of n possible stimuli, a slight but consistent increase in reaction time takes place with an increase in the number of alternatives. An analogy is drawn between the second experiment and a vigilance task and an expectancy hypothesis is invoked to explain the results.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alluisi

E. A.

Muller

P. F.

JR. Fitts

P. M.

(1957). An Information analysis of verbal and motor responses in a forced-paced serial task. J. exp. Psychol. 53, 153–58.

Crossman

E. R. F. W.

(1953). Entropy and choice time: The effect of frequency unbalance on choice response. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 5, 41–51.

Crossman

E. R. F. W.

(1955). The information capacity of the human operator in symbolic and non-symbolic control processes. The Application of Information Theory to Human Operator Problems Draper

W. R. (D.) Report No. 2/56, Ministry of Supply.

Deese

James

(1955). Some problems in the theory of vigilance. Psychol. Rev. 62, 359–68.

Hick

W. E.

(1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 4, 11–26.

Hyman

(1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. J. exp. Psychol. 45, 188–96.

Jenkins

H. M.

Unpublished paper read in a Symposium on Vigilance before the American Psychological Association in New York City USA 1954.

Leonard

Alfred J.

(1959). Tactual choice reactions: I. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 11, 76–83.

McNemar

(1949). Psychological Statistics New York.

10.

Merkel

(1885). Die zeitlichen Verhältnisse der Willensthätigkeit. Philos. Stud. 2, 73–127.

11.

Mowbray

G. H.

Rhoades

M. V.

(1959). On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 11, 16–23.

12.

Pierce

J. R.

Karlin

J. E.

(1957). Reading rates and the information rate of a human channel. Bell System Tech. J. 36, 497–516.

13.

Seibel

(1959). Discrimination reaction time as a function of the number of alternatives and of the particular stimulus-response patterns. Amer. Psychol. 14, 396.

14.

Woodworth

R. S.

(1938). Experimental Psychology New York.