On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task

Abstract

This investigation examines the extent to which intelligent young adults seek (i) confirming evidence alone (enumerative induction) or (ii) confirming and discontinuing evidence (eliminative induction), in order to draw conclusions in a simple conceptual task. The experiment is designed so that use of confirming evidence alone will almost certainly lead to erroneous conclusions because (i) the correct concept is entailed by many more obvious ones, and (ii) the universe of possible instances (numbers) is infinite.

Six out of 29 subjects reached the correct conclusion without previous incorrect ones, 13 reached one incorrect conclusion, nine reached two or more incorrect conclusions, and one reached no conclusion. The results showed that those subjects, who reached two or more incorrect conclusions, were unable, or unwilling to test their hypotheses. The implications are discussed in relation to scientific thinking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bruner

J. S.

Goodnow

J. J.

Austin

G. A.

(1956). A Study of Thinking London.

Goldstein

Scheerer

(1941). Abstract and concrete behaviour; an experimental study with special tests. Psychol. Monogr. 53, No. 239.

Hilgard

E. R.

(1938). A summary and evaluation of alternative procedures for the construction of Vincent curves. Psychol. Bull. 35, 282–97.

Hull

C. L.

(1920). Quantitative aspects of the evolution of concepts. Psychol. Monogr. 28, No. 123.

Kendall

M. G.

(1948). Rank Correlation Methods London.

Popper

K. R.

(1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery London.

Smoke

K. L.

(1932). An objective study of concept formation. Psychol. Monogr. 42, No. 191.

Von Wright

G. H.

(1951). A Treatise on Probability and Induction London.

Whitfield

J. W.

(1947). Rank correlation between two variables, one of which is ranked, the other dichotomous. Biometrika 34, 292.