Visual Discrimination of Shape by Octopus. Squares and Triangles

Abstract

An experiment was performed upon visual discrimination of shape by the octopus in order to test two predictions derived from a theory of visual discrimination of orientation and shape. Two groups of octopuses were trained to discriminate between a square and a triangle and between a diamond and a triangle. It was found that octopuses discriminate more readily between a square with base horizontal and a triangle than between a diamond and a triangle. Transfer tests showed that: (1) For the octopus, an upright and an inverted triangle have more equivalence than a diamond and a square with base horizontal. (2) Octopuses do not discriminate between the figures used by analysing only differences in one part of the figures (e.g. bases or tops). (3) Having learned the initial discrimination, octopuses transfer to both larger and smaller figures. (4) A pentagon has more equivalence to a square or diamond than to a triangle. (5) A circle is not treated as equivalent to a square. The results are taken to be in agreement with the theory that octopuses analyse the vertical and lateral extents of figures, and that shape discrimination is achieved by analysing the changes in the rates of change in the firing of neurons representing the vertical and lateral extents of the shapes. The results are shown to differ from those obtained with birds and rats, but to agree with results found for higher mammals where these are available for comparison.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boycott

B. B.

(1954). Learning in Octopus vulgaris and other Cephalopoda. Pubbl. Staz. Zool. Napoli 25, 67–93.

Boycott

B. B.

Young

J. Z.

(1955). A memory system in Octopus vulgaris Lamark. Proc. Roy. Soc. B. 143, 449–480.

Deutsch

J. A.

(1955). A theory of shape recognition. Brit, J. Psychol. 46, 30–37.

Fields

P. E.

(1932). Studies in concept formation. Comp. Psychol. Monog. 9, No. 2 1–70.

Fields

P. E.

(1936). Studies in concept formation: IV. A comparison of white rats with raccoons with respect to their visual discrimination of geometrical figures. J. comp. Psychol. 21, 341–355.

Gellerman

L. W.

(1933). Form discrimination in chimpanzees and two-year-old children: I. Form (Triangularity) per se. J. genet. Psychol. 42, 28–50.

Lashley

K. S.

(1938). The mechanism of vision: XV. Preliminary studies of the rat's capacity for detail vision. J. gen. Psychol. 18, 123–93.

Münn

N. L.

(1931). The relative efficacy of form and background in the chick's discrimination of visual patterns. J. comp. Psychol. 12, 41–76.

Neet

C. C.

(1933). Visual discrimination in the Macacus rhesus monkey. J. genet. Psychol. 43, 163–196.

10.

Smith

K. U.

(1934). Visual discrimination in the cat: II. A further study of the capacity of the cat for visual figure discrimination. J. genet. Psychol. 45, 336–357.

11.

Smith

K. U.

(1936). Visual discrimination in the cat: III. The relative effect of paired and unpaired stimuli in the discriminative behaviour of the cat. J. genet. Psychol. 48, 29–57.

12.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1957a). Visual discrimination of orientation by octopus. Brit. J. Psychol. 48, 55–71.

13.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1957b). Visual discrimination of orientation and shape by octopus. Nature 179, 11–13.

14.

Sutherland

N. S.

(1958). Visual discrimination of the orientation of rectangles by Octopus vulgaris Lamark. J. comp. physiol. Psychol in press.

15.

Towe

R. L.

(1954). A. study of figural equivalence in the pigeon. J. comp. physiol. Psychol. 47, 283–287.