The Effect upon Monaural Sensitivity of Continuous Stimulation of the opposite Ear

Abstract

The threshold to a 1,000 c./sec. tone presented to the left ear was measured whilst the right ear was under continuous stimulation by a 400 c./sec. tone. Observations were made, on different groups of subjects, under three stimulus conditions and two conditions of attention. Thresholds were found to increase with increasing intensities of the continuous tone. Attention to that part of the field associated with the continuous stimulus produced no significant change, whether the continuous stimulus was present or not. There were no significant after-effects during ten minutes following the end of the continuous stimulus, though the results suggested a slow decrease in threshold.

Several explanations of the phenomenon are considered. Cross-hearing and the reflex contraction of the middle-ear muscles can be virtually excluded. Central inhibition or the central control of sensory end-organs can account for the results. A statistical hypothesis is also tenable.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

von Békésy

(1948). Vibration of the head in a sound field and its role in hearing by bone conduction. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 20, 749–760.

Broadbent

D. E.

(1953). Classical conditioning and human watch-keeping. Psychol. Rev. 60, 331–339.

Davis

(1951). Psychophysiology of hearing and deafness. Handbook of Experimental Psychology Stevens

S. S.

New York

1116–1142.

Granit

Brain control of the sense organs. Proceedings of the XlVth International Congress of Psychology 1954.

Granit

(1955). Receptors and Sensory Perception New Haven.

Gregory

R. L.

Cane

(1955). A statistical information theory of visual thresholds. Nature 176, 1272.

Jepson

(1951). The threshold of the reflexes of the intratympanic muscles in a normal material examined by means of the impedance method. Acta Otolaryn. 39, 406–408.

Kruskal

W. H.

Wallis

W. A.

(1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc 47, 583–621.

Lane

C. E.

(1925). Binaural beats. Phys. Rev. 26, 401–412.

10.

Licklider

J. C. R.

(1951). Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. Handbook of Experimental Psychology Stevens

S. S.

New York

985–1039.

11.

Metz

(1951). Studies on the contraction of the tympanic muscles as indicated by changes in the impedance of the ear. Acta Otolaryn. 39, 397–405.

12.

Pavlov

I. P.

(1927). Conditioned reflexes London.

13.

Ryan

T. A.

(1940). Interrelationships of the sensory systems. Psychol. Bull. 37, 659–698.

14.

Sherrington

C. S.

(1947). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System 2nd Ed. London.

15.

Symons

J. R.

(1954). An Investigation of Intersensory Relationships University of Reading Unpublished Ph.D. thesis.

16.

Wegel

R. L.

Lane

C. E.

(1924). The auditory masking of one pure tone by another and its probable relation to the dynamics of the inner ear. Phys. Rev. 23, 266–285.

17.

Wever

E. G.

Lawrence

(1954). Physiological Acoustics Princeton.