Sensory Factors in the Voluntary Application of Pressure

Abstract

The experiments described attempt to assess the extent of sensory control of voluntary movements of the forearm and finger when the contractions of the muscles concerned are approximately isometric.

In the first two experiments, records were obtained of the accuracy with which subjects were able to reproduce a particular pressure with the ulnar border of the hand at different pressure values and rates of application. Results show a statistically significant increase in error of reproduction of pressure as the pressure applied decreases and the rate of application is increased.

In the third experiment, using an applied force of 25 gms. weight, a significant difference in accuracy of reproduction of finger pressure between the maximum and a slower rate of application is also shown, but not when the digital nerves are blocked by a local anaesthetic. Furthermore, there is no significant difference in accuracy of reproduction of finger pressure between the anaesthetized and unanaesthetized condition at the fastest rate of application. On the other hand, at the slow rate of application, there is an increasingly significant difference between the anæsthetized and unanaethetized condition as the applied force is reduced below 400 gms. weight, in favour of the control condition.

In the fourth experiment, subjects were trained to apply a force of 25 gms. weight using a small area of skin on the palmar surface of the index finger, then tested for their ability to reproduce the same force before and after changing the size of the area of application. Results show a marked change in applied force corresponding to the change in size of skin area used.

It is concluded that below an applied force of about 400 gms. weight, the maximum accuracy in reproduction of finger pressure is dependent upon cutaneous receptors.

The results of these experiments are discussed in relation to evidence from other experimental, clinical and animal studies and it is suggested that the major function of afferent impulses from a limb in the initiation of voluntary movements is probably facilitatory rather than sensory.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

R. D.

Denny-Brown

Pearson

C. M.

(1953). Diseases of Muscle London.

Backhouse

K. M.

Catton

W. T.

(1954). An experimental study of the functions of the lumbrical muscles in the human hand. J. Anat. 88, 133–141.

Browne

Lee

Ring

P. A.

(1954). The sensation of passive movement at the metatarso-phalangeal joint of the great toe in man. J. Physiol. 126, 448–458.

Duchenne

G. B.

(1872). L'electrisation localises. Paralysis of the muscular and articular sensibility. Selections from the clinical works of Duchenne Poore

G. V.

London: New Sydenham Soc 1883.

von Frey

(1926). Fortgesetzte untersuchungen iiber die sinnesphysiologischen Grundlagen der Bewegungswahrnehmungen. Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat. 104, 821–831.

Fullerton

G. S.

Cattell

J. McK.

(1892). On the perception of small differences, with special reference to the extent, force and time of movement Penn. Univ. Philos. Series No. 2.

Gellhorn

(1953). Physiological Foundations of Neurology and Psychiatry Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota.

Gibbs

C. B.

(1954). The continuous regulation of skilled response by kinassthetic feedback. Brit. J. Psychol. 45, 24–39.

Goldscheider

(1889). Untersuchungen ueber den Muskelsinn. Arch. Anat. Physiol., Lpz. 369–502Min. of Supply Trans, No. 20925T.

10.

Hick

W. E.

(1948). Reaction time for the amendment of a response. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 1, 175–179.

11.

Holway

A. H.

Pratt

C. C.

(1936). The Weber-ratio for intensitive discrimination. Psychol. Rev. 43, 322–340.

12.

Jenkins

W. O.

(1947). The discrimination and reproduction of motor adjustments with various types of aircraft controls. Amer. J. Psychol. 60, 397–406.

13.

Lashley

K. S.

(1917). The accuracy of movement in the absence of excitation from the moving organ. Amer. J. Physiol. 43, 169–194.

14.

Lassek

A. M.

(1953a). Potency of isolated brachial dorsal roots in controlling muscular physiology. Neurology 3, 53–57.

15.

Lassek

A. M.

(1953b). Inactivation of voluntary motor function following rhizotomy. J. Neuropath. 12, 83–87.

16.

Lassek

A. M.

(1955). Effect of combined afferent lesions on motor function. Neurology 5, 269–272.

17.

Lassek

A. M.

Moyer

E. K.

(1953). An ontogenetic study of motor deficits following dorsal brachial rhizotomy. J. Neurophysiol. 16, 247–251.

18.

Macpherson

S. J.

Dees

Grindley

G. C.

(1948). The effect of knowledge of results on learning and performance. II. Some characteristics of very simple skills. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 1, 68–78.

19.

Matthews

B. H. C.

(1933). Nerve endings in mammalian muscle. J. Physiol. 78, 1–53.

20.

Meyer

O. B.

(1921). Zur frage der Gelenksensibilitat. Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilk. 70, 60–1.

21.

Mott

F. W.

Sherrington

C. S.

(1895). Experiments upon the influence of sensory-nerves upon movement and nutrition of the limbs. Proc. Roy. Soc 57, 481–488.

22.

Peters

Wenborne

A. A.

(1936). The time pattern of voluntary movements. Brit. J. Psychol. 26, 388–406.

23.

Pillsbury

W. B.

(1901). Does the sensation of movement originate in the joints?. Amer. J. Psychol. 12, 346–353.

24.

Provins

K. A.

(1955). The role of receptors in muscle and tendon in controlling the application of finger pressure in man. J. Physiol. 128, 55–56P.

25.

Provins

K. A.

(1956). Handedness and skill. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 8, 79–95.

26.

Strumpell

(1902). Ueber die Störungen der Bewegungbei fast vollständiger Anästhesie eines Armes durch Stichverletzung des Rückenmarks. Dtsch Z. Nervenheilk. 23, 1–38.

27.

Taylor

F. V.

Birmingham

H. P.

(1948). Studies of tracking behaviour. II. The acceleration pattern of quick manual corrective responses. J. exp. Psychol. 38, 783–795.

28.

Twitchell

T. E.

(1954). Sensory factors in purposive movement. J. NeurophysioL 17, 239–252.

29.

Vince

M. A.

(1948). Corrective movements in a pursuit task. Quart. J. exp. Psychol. 1, 85–103.

30.

Weber

E. H.

(1846). Der Tastsinn und das Gemeingefühl. In Wagner, R. Hand-worterbuch d. Physiologie 3, No. 2 481–588.

31.

Weiss

(1954). The rôle of proprioceptive feedback in positioning responses. J. exp. Psychol. 47, 215–224.

32.

Weiss

(1955). Movement error, pressure variation and the range effect. J. exp. Psychol. 50, 191–196.

33.

Winter

J. E.

(1912). The sensation of movement. Psychol. Rev. 19, 374–385.

34.

Woodworth

R. S.

Schlosberg

H. S.

(1955). Experimental Psychology London.