Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Although interference is a well-established forgetting function in short-term auditory memory, an adequate understanding of its underlying mechanisms and time course has yet to be attained. The present study therefore aimed to explore these issues in memory for timbre. Listeners compared standard and comparison complex tones, having distinct timbres (four components varying in frequency), over a 4.7-s retention interval and made a same–different response. This interval either was silent or included one of 15 distractor tones occurring 0 ms, 100 ms, or 1,200 ms after the standard. These distractors varied in the extent to which the frequencies of their component tones were shared with the standard. Performance in comparing the two tones was significantly impaired by distractors composed of novel frequencies, regardless of the temporal position at which the distractor occurred. These results were fully compatible with the recent timbre memory model (McKeown & Wellsted, 2009) and suggested that interference in auditory memory operates via a feature-overwriting mechanism.

Keywords

Auditory memory Timbre Interference Short-term memory Forgetting

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann

E. M.

Gray

W. D.

(2002). Forgetting to remember: The functional relationship of decay and interference. Psychological Science 13, 27–33.

Barrouillet

Camos

(2009). Interference: Unique source of forgetting in working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Science 13, 145–146.

Berti

Münzer

Schröger

Pechmann

(2006). Different interference effects in musicians and a control group. Experimental Psychology 53, 111–116.

(2002). Variance of d′ for the same–different method. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 34, 37–45.

Brown

G. D. A.

Lewandowsky

(2010). Forgetting in memory models: Arguments against trace decay and consolidation failure. Della Salla

Forgetting. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Cowan

(1984). On short and long auditory stores. Psychological Bulletin 96, 341–370.

Cowan

Saults

J. S.

Nugent

L. D.

(2001). The ravages of absolute and relative amounts of time on memory. Roedgier

H. L.

III Nairne

J. S.

Neath

Suprenant

The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association 315–330.

Deutsch

(1999). The processing of pitch combinations. Deutsch

The psychology of music. New York: Academic Press 349–411.

Durlach

N. I.

Braida

L. D.

(1969). Intensity perception: I. Preliminary theory of intensity resolution. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46, 372–383.

10.

Elhilali

Micheyl

Oxenham

A. J.

Shamma

S. A.

(2009). Temporal coherence in the perceptual organization and cortical representation of auditory scenes. Neuron 61, 317–329.

11.

Glasberg

B. R.

Moore

B. C. J.

(1990). Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hearing Research 47, 103–138.

12.

Jones

D. M.

Macken

W. J.

Harries

(1997). Disruption of short-term recognition memory for tones: Streaming or interference?. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 50A, 337–357.

13.

Jonides

Lewis

R. L.

Nee

D. E.

Lustig

C. A.

Berman

M. G.

Moore

K. S.

(2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology 59, 193–224.

14.

Lewandowsky

Oberauer

Brown

G. D. A.

(2009). No temporal decay in verbal short-term memory. Trends in Cognitive Science 13, 120–126.

15.

Marascuilo

L. A.

(1970). Extensions of the significance test for one-parameter signal detection hypotheses. Psychometrika 35, 237–243.

16.

Massaro

D. W.

(1972). Preperceptual images, processing time and perceptual units in auditory perception. Psychological Review 79, 124–145.

17.

May

P. J. C.

Tiitinen

(2010). Mismatch negativity (MMN), the deviance-elicited auditory deflection, explained. Psychophysiology 47, 66–122.

18.

McKeown

Wellsted

(2009). Auditory memory for timbre. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35, 855–875.

19.

Menon

Levitin

D. J.

Smith

B. K.

Lembke

Krasnow

B. D.

Glazer

(2002). Neural correlates of timbre change in harmonic sounds. NeuroImage 17, 1742–1754.

20.

Näätänen

Tervaniemi

Sussman

Paavilainen

Winkler

(2001). “Primitive intelligence” in auditory cortex. Trends in Neurosciences 24, 283–288.

21.

Nairne

J. S.

(2002). Remembering over the short-term: The case against the standard model. Annual Review of Psychology 53, 53–81.

22.

Oberauer

(2009). Interference between storage and processing in working memory: Feature overwriting, not similarity-based competition. Memory & Cognition 37, 346–357.

23.

Plomp

(1976). Aspects of tone sensation London: Academic Press.

24.

Ries

D. T.

DiGiovanni

J. J.

(2009). Effects of recurrent tonal information on auditory working memory for pitch. Hearing Research 255, 14–21.

25.

Runquist

W. N.

(1975). Interference among memory traces. Memory & Cognition 3, 143–159.

26.

Schröger

(2007). Mismatch negativity: A microphone into auditory memory. Journal of Psychophysiology 21, 138–146.

27.

Starr

G. E.

Pitt

M. A.

(1997). Interference effects in short-term memory for timbre. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102, 486–494.

28.

Winkler

(2007). Interpreting the mismatch negativity. Journal of Psychophysiology 21, 147–163.

29.

Winkler

Cowan

(2005). From sensory to long-term memory: Evidence from auditory memory reactivation studies. Experimental Psychology 52, 3–20.

30.

Wixted

J. T.

(2004). The psychology and neuropsychology of forgetting. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 235–269.

Rapid Communication: Interference in Short-Term Auditory Memory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References