More fine-grained texture becomes visible if the distance between an observer and an object or surface is reduced. This article illustrates with a schematic example that the inverse rate of the relative appearance of visible texture provides information about time to contact if the observer has a constant visual acuity and the texture has a certain scale-independent structure. An experiment is reported in which texture appearance was manipulated. Participants were asked to make forced-choice time-to-contact judgements. A small but significant effect indicates that the judgements were affected by the rate of appearance of the texture. It is concluded that observers use this type of information.
BootsmaR. J.CraigC. M. (2002). Global and local contributions to the optical specification of time to contact: Observer sensitivity to composite tau.Perception31, 901–924.
2.
Calvo GarzónF. (2008). Towards a general theory of antirepresentationalism.The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science59, 259–292.
3.
DeLuciaP. R.KaiserM. K.BushJ. M.MeyerL. E.SweetB. T. (2003). Information integration in judgments about time to contact.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56A, 1165–1189.
4.
GibsonJ. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perceptionHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (Original work published 1979).
5.
GrayR.ReganD. (1999). Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate stimulation.Perception & Psychophysics61, 236–245.
6.
JacobsD. M.MichaelsC. F. (2007). Direct learning.Ecological Psychology19, 321–349.
7.
JacobsD. M.RunesonS.AnderssonI. (2001). Reliance on constraints means detection of information.Behavioral and Brain Sciences24, 679–680.
8.
JacobsD. M.SilvaP. L.CalvoJ. (2009). An empirical illustration and formalization of the theory of direct learning: The muscle-based perception of kinetic properties.Ecological Psychology21, 245–289.
9.
KimN.-G.GrockiM. J. (2006). Multiple sources of information and time-to-contact judgments.Vision Research46, 1946–1958.
10.
LeeD. N.ReddishP. E. (1981). Plummeting gannets: A paradigm of ecological optics.Nature293, 293–294.
11.
LeeD. N.YoungD. S.ReddishP. E.LoughS.ClaytonT. M. H. (1983). Visual timing in hitting an accelerating ball.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology35A, 333–346.
12.
López-MolinerJ.BonnetC. (2002). Speed of response initiation in a time-to-contact discrimination task reflects the use of η.Vision Research42, 2419–2430.
13.
López-MolinerJ.BrennerE.SmeetsJ. B. J. (2007). Effects of texture and shape on perceived time to passage: Knowing “what” influences judging “when”.Perception & Psychophysics69, 887–894.
14.
MichaelsC. F.ArzamarskiR.IsenhowerR. W.JacobsD. M. (2008). Direct learning in dynamic touch.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance34, 944–957.
15.
MichaelsC. F.ZeinstraE. B.OudejansR. R. D. (2001). Information and action in punching a falling ball.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54A, 69–93.
16.
RunesonS. (1988). The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14, 295–304.
17.
SavelsberghG. J. P.WhitingH. T. A.BootsmaR. J. (1991). Grasping tau.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 315–322.
18.
TresilianJ. R. (1999). Visually timed action: Time-out for “tau”?.Trends in Cognitive Sciences3, 301–310.
19.
van der KampJ.SavelsberghG.SmeetsJ. (1997). Multiple information sources in interceptive timing.Human Movement Science16, 787–821.
20.
VincentA.ReganD. (1997). Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size.Perception & Psychophysics59, 32–36.
