This paper reviews recent aspects of my research. It focuses, first, on the idea that during the perception of objects and people, action-based representations are automatically activated and, second, that such action representations can feed back and influence the perception of people and objects. For example, when one is merely viewing an object such as a coffee cup, the action it affords, such as a reach to grasp, is activated even though there is no intention to act on the object. Similarly, when one is observing a person's behaviour, their actions are automatically simulated, and such action simulation can influence our perception of the person and the object with which they interacted. The experiments to be described investigate the role of attention in such vision-to-action processes, the effects of such processes on emotion, and the role of a perceiver's body state in their interpretation of visual stimuli.
BachP.PeatfieldN.TipperS. P. (2007). Focusing on body sites: The role of spatial attention in action perception.Experimental Brain Research178, 509–517.
2.
BachP.TipperS. P. (2006). Bend it like Beckham: Embodying the motor skills of famous athletes.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59, 2033–2039.
3.
BachP.TipperS. P. (2007). Implicit action encoding influences personal-trait judgments.Cognition102, 151–178.
4.
BarsalouL. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual systemAmsterdam: Elsevier.
5.
BaylissA. P.di PellegrinoG.TipperS. P. (2004). Orienting of attention via observed eye-gaze is head-centred.Cognition94, B1–B10.
6.
BaylissA. P.FrischenA.FenskeM. J.TipperS. P. (2007). Affective evaluations of objects are influenced by observed gaze direction and emotional expression.Cognition104, 644–653.
7.
BaylissA. P.GriffithsD.TipperS. P. (2009). Predictive gaze cues affect face evaluation: The effects of facial emotion.The European Journal of Cognitive Psychology21, 1072–1084.
8.
BaylissA. P.PaulM. A.CannonP. R.TipperS. P. (2006). Gaze cueing and affective judgments: I like what you look at.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13, 1061–1666.
9.
BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2006a). Gaze cues evoke both spatial and object-centred shifts of attention.Perception & Psychophysics68, 310–318.
10.
BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2006b). Predictive gaze cues and personality judgements: Should eye trust you.Psychological Science17, 514–520.
11.
BlakemoreS. J.DecetyJ. (2001). From the perception of action to the understanding of intention.Nature Reviews Neuroscience2, 561–567.
12.
BrassM.BekkeringH.WohlschlagerA.PrinzW. (2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic spatial and imitative cues.Brain & Cognition44, 124–143.
13.
BubD. N.MassonM. E. J. (in press). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
14.
CannonP. R.HayesA. E.TipperS. P. (2009). An electromyographic investigation of the impact of task relevance on facial mimicry.Cognition & Emotion23, 918–929.
15.
CannonP. R.HayesA. E.TipperS. P. (in press). Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography.Cognition & EmotionAdvance online publication. doi:10.1080/02699930902927698.
16.
CharmanT.Baron-CohenS.SwettenhamJ.BairdG.CoxA.DrewA. (2001). Testing joint attention, imitation and play as infancy precursors to language and theory of mind.Cognitive Development15, 481–498.
17.
DavidN.BewernickB. H.CohenM. X.NewenA.LuxS.FinkG. R. (2006). Neural representations of self versus other: Visual-spatial perspective taking and agency in a virtual ball tossing game.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18, 898–910.
18.
DimbergU.ThunbergM. (1998). Rapid facial reactions to emotional facial expressions.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology39, 139–45.
di PellegrinoG.FadigaL.FogassiL.GalleseL.RizzolattiG. (1992). Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study.Experimental Brain Research91, 176–180.
21.
di PellegrinoG.RafalR.TipperS. P. (2005). Implicitly evoked actions modulate visual selection: Evidence from parietal extinction.Current Biology15, 1–4.
EimerM.ForsterB.Van ZelzenJ.PrabhuG. (2005). Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention.Neuropsychologia43, 957–966.
24.
EmeryN. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews24, 581–604.
25.
FenskeM. J.EastwoodJ. D. (2003). Modulation of focussed attention by faces expressing emotion: Evidence from flanker tasks.Emotion3, 327–343.
26.
FoxE.LesterV.RussoR.BowlesR. J.PichlerA.DuttonK. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently?.Cognition & Emotion14, 61–92.
27.
FoxE.MathewsA.CalderA. J.YiendJ. (2007). Anxiety and sensitivity to gaze direction in emotionally expressive faces.Emotion7, 3478–486.
28.
Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 490–495.
29.
FrischenA.BaylissA. P.TipperS. P. (2007a). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition and individual differences.Psychological Bulletin133, 694–724.
30.
FrischenA.LoachD.TipperS. P. (2009). Seeing the world through another person's eyes: Simulating selective attention via action observation.Cognition111, 212–218.
31.
FrischenA.SmilekD.EastwoodJ. D.TipperS. P. (2007b). Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The role of time-course and fixation cue.Visual Cognition15, 881–895.
32.
FrischenA.TipperS. P. (2004). Orienting attention via observed gaze shift evokes longer-term inhibitory effects: Implications for social interactions, attention and memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General133, 516–533.
33.
FrischenA.TipperS. P. (2006). Long-term gaze cueing effects: Evidence for retrieval of prior states of attention from memory.Visual Cognition14, 351–364.
34.
GastautH.BertJ. (1954). EEG changes during cinematographic presentation: Moving picture activation of the EEG.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology6, 433–444.
35.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
36.
GlenbergA. M. (1997). What memory is for.Behavioral & Brain Sciences20, 1–55.
37.
GriffithsD.TipperS. P. (2009). Priming of reach trajectory when observing actions: Hand-centred effects.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62, 2450–2470.
38.
GrosbrasM. H.LairdA. R.PausT. (2005). Cortical regions involved in eye movements, shifts of attention and gaze perception.Human Brain Mapping25, 140–154.
39.
HayesA. E.PaulM. A.BeugerB.TipperS. P. (2008). Self produced and observed actions influence emotion: The roles of action fluency and eye gaze.Psychological Record72, 461–472.
40.
HoffmanE. A.HaxbyJ. V. (2000). Distinct representations of gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception.Nature Neuroscience3, 80–84.
41.
HommelB.MusselerJ.AscherslebenG.PrinzW. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Behavioural & Brain Sciences24, 849–878.
42.
HoodB. M.WillenJ. D.DriverJ. (1998). Adult's eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants.Psychological Science9, 131–134.
43.
Houghton, G., & Tipper, S. P. (1994). A model of inhibitory mechanisms in selective attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 53–112). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44.
Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2001). Detection by action: Evidence for affordances in search in neglect. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 84–88..
45.
JacksonL.MeltzoffA. N.DecetyJ. (2006). Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective taking.NeuroImage31, 429–439.
46.
JellemaT.BakerC. I.WickerB.PerrettD. I. (2000). Neural representation for the perception of the intentionality of actions.Brain & Cognition44, 280–302.
47.
KesslerK.TipperS. P. (2004). Retrieval of implicit inhibitory processes: The impact of visual field, object identity and memory dynamics.Visual Cognition11, 965–995.
48.
KilnerJ. M.MarchantJ. L.FrithC. D. (2006). Modulation of the mirror system by social relevance.Scan1, 143–148.
49.
LhermitteF. (1983). “Utilization behavior” and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobe.Brain106, 237–255.
50.
LoganG. D.CowanW. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control.Psychological Review91, 295–327.
51.
LuriaA. R. (1980). Higher cortical function in manNew York: Consultants Bureau.
52.
MooreC.DunhamP. J. (1995). Joint attention: Its origins and role in developmentHove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53.
MorrisonI.LloydD. M.di PellegrinoG.RobertsN. (2004). Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulated cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue?.Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience4, 270–278.
54.
Morrison, I., Tipper, S. P., Adams, W., & Bach, P. (2010). ‘Feeling’ others’ painful actions: SII ingegrates observed pain and action information. Manuscript in preparation.
55.
MuthukumaraswamyS. D.JohnsonB. W.McNairN. A. (2004). Mu rhythm modulation during observation of an object-directed grasp.Cognitive Brain Research19, 195–201.
56.
NiedenthalP. M. (2007). Embodying emotion.Science316, 1002–1005.
57.
PerrettD. I.SmithP. A.PotterD. DMistlinA. J.HeadA. S.MilnerA. D. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction.Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B223, 293–317.
58.
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: X. Control of language processes (pp. 531–556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
59.
RiegerM.GauggelS. (1999). Inhibitory after effects in the stop-signal paradigm.British Journal of Psychology90, 509–518.
60.
Robertson, I. H., & North, N. (1992). Spatio-motor cueing in unilateral left neglect: The role of hemispace, hand and motor activation. Neuropsychologia, 30, 553–563.
61.
SchuchS.BaylissA. P.KleinC.TipperS. P. (2010). Attention modulates motor system activation during action observation: Evidence for inhibitory control Manuscript in preparation.
62.
SchuchS.TipperS. P. (2007). On observing another person's actions: Influences of observed inhibition and errors.Perception & Psychophysics69, 828–837.
63.
ShimojoS.SimionC.ShimojoE.ScheierC. (2003). Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference.Nature Neuroscience6, 1317–1322.
64.
SingerT.SeymourB.O'DohertyJ.KraubeH.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain.Science20, 1157–1162.
65.
StepperS.StrackF. (1993). Proprioceptive determinants of emotional and nonemotional feelings.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64, 211–220.
66.
StrackF.MartinL. L.StepperS. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating conditions of the human smile: A nonobtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54, 768–777.
67.
TipperS. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming with to be ignored objects.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37A, 571–590.
68.
TipperS. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology54A, 321–343.
69.
Tipper, S. P. (2004). Attention and action. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed., pp. 619–630). Boston, MA: MIT Press..
70.
TipperS. P.BachP. (2008). Your own actions influence how you perceive other people: A misattribution of action appraisals.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology44, 1082–1090.
71.
Tipper, S. P., Brehaut, J. C., & Driver, J. (1990). Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 492–504.
72.
Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., & Weaver, B. (1991). Object-centred inhibition of return of visual attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 591–611.
73.
Tipper, S. P., Grison, S., & Kessler, K. (2003). Long-term inhibition of return of attention. Psychological Science, 14, 19–25.
TipperS. P.LortieC.BaylisG. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action centered attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18, 891–905.
76.
TipperS. P.PaulM.HayesA. (2006). Vision-for-action: The effects of object property discrimination and action state on affordance compatibility effects.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13, 493–498.
77.
TipperS. P.PhillipsN.DancerC.LloydD.HowardL. A.McGloneF. (2001). Vision influences tactile perception at body sites that cannot be directly viewed.Experimental Brain Research139, 160–167.
78.
TipperS. P.WeaverB.JerreatL.BurakA. (1994). Object and environment based inhibition of return.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 478–499.
79.
Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830–846.
80.
WinkielmanP.CacioppoJ. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysical evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology81, 989–1000.
