Noncriterial Recollection Influences Metacognitive Monitoring and Control Processes

Abstract

When retrieving information from memory, temporarily irrelevant material may influence future retrieval endeavours. According to an accessibility account, the amount and intensity of this information can be used to predict the availability of related material. A dual-source paradigm was used to investigate whether information that was not relevant (i.e., noncriterial recollection) to the current memory search would influence metacognitive judgements about a relevant, criterial dimension. In two experiments, participants gave higher feelings-of-knowing judgements for a weakly encoded source dimension when they could subsequently recall the other source dimension later. Furthermore, the influence of the noncriterial information appeared to be driven more so by the subjective state of remembering rather than knowing. Thus, strong memorial information that is temporarily irrelevant influences behaviour.

Keywords

Recollection Metacognition Source memory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dewhurst

S. A.

Parry

L. A.

(2000). Emotionality, distinctiveness, and recollective experience. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 12, 541–551.

Hart

J. T.

(1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educational Psychology 56, 208–216.

Hicks

J. L.

Marsh

R. L.

(1999). Remember–know judgments can depend on how the question is asked. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, 117–122.

Hicks

J. L.

Marsh

R. L.

Ritschel

(2002). The role of recollection and partial information in source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 28, 503–508.

Johnson

M. K.

Hashtroudi

Lindsay

D. S.

(1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin 114, 3–28.

Koriat

(1993). How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of the feeling of knowing. Psychological Review 100, 609–639.

Koriat

Levy-Sadot

(2001). The combined contributions of the cue familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 27, 34–53.

Mather

Henkel

L. A.

Johnson

M. K.

(1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition 25, 826–837.

Mulligan

N. W.

Hirshman

(1997). Measuring the bases of recognition memory: An investigation of the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 23, 280–304.

10.

Parks

C. M.

(2007). The role of noncriterial recollection in estimating recollection and familiarity. Journal of Memory and Language 57, 81–100.

11.

Reder

L. M.

Ritter

F. E.

(1992). What determines initial feeling of knowing? Familiarity with question terms, not with the answer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 18, 435–451.

12.

Snodgrass

J. G.

Vanderwart

(1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6, 174–215.

13.

Starns

J. J.

Hicks

J. L.

(2005). Source dimensions are retrieved independently in multidimensional monitoring tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition 31, 1213–1220.

14.

Starns

J. J.

Hicks

J. L.

(2008). Context attributes in memory are bound to item information, but not to one another. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 309–314.

15.

Toth

J. P.

Parks

C. M.

(2006). Effects of age on estimated familiarity in the process dissociation procedure: The role of noncriterial recollection. Memory & Cognition 34, 527–537.

16.

Wais

P. E.

Mickes

Wixted

J. T.

(2008). Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, 400–405.

17.

Yonelinas

A. P.

Jacoby

L. L.

(1996). Noncriterial recollection: Familiarity as automatic, irrelevant recollection. Consciousness & Cognition 5, 131–141.