While there are pointers relating to the consequences of repetition, a general framework regarding the cognitive implications of processing multidimensional stimuli as a function of previous stimulus history is currently lacking. Three experiments using sounds varying in location and pitch were carried out, in which the immediate consequences of repeating or changing task-relevant and task-irrelevant attributes were orthogonally examined. A consistent pattern of data was shown, in that the magnitude of selective attention failure was larger when the task-relevant value repeated across trials, while differences between dimensions were larger when the task-relevant value changed across trials. These effects of irrelevance and dimension as a function of intertrial contingency are summarized in a model depicting the dynamic allocation of processing resource.
AnourovaI.NikoulineV. V.IlmoniemiR. J.HottaJ.AronenH. J.CarlsonS. (2001). Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing.NeuroImage14, 1268–1277.
2.
BamberD. (1969). Reaction times and error rates for “same”–“different” judgments of multidimensional stimuli.Perception & Psychophysics6, 169–174.
3.
BregmanA. S.SteigerH. (1980). Auditory streaming and vertical localization: Interdepedence of “what” and “where” decisions in audition.Perception and Psychophysics28, 539–546.
4.
CohenJ.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers25, 257–271.
5.
DuncanJ. (1985). Visual search and visual attention.PosnerM. I.MartinO. S. M.Attention and Performance XIHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates85–160.
6.
DysonB. J. (2010). Perceptual organisation.PlackC.The Oxford handbook of auditory science: Auditory perceptionOxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7.
DysonB. J.QuinlanP. T. (2004). Stimulus processing constraints in audition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30, 1117–1131.
8.
EgethH. E. (1966). Parallel versus serial processes in multidimensional stimulus discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics1, 245–252.
9.
FarellB. (1985). “Same”–“different” judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons.Psychological Bulletin98, 419–456.
10.
FoundA.MüllerH. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics58, 88–101.
11.
HawkinsH. L. (1969). Parallel processing in complex visual discrimination.Perception & Psychophysics5, 56–64.
12.
HawkinsH. LMacKayS. L.HolleyS. L.FriedinB. D.CohenS. L. (1973). Locus of the relative frequency effect in choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology101, 90–99.
13.
HillstromA. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search.Perception and Psychophysics62, 800–817.
14.
HommelB. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action.Trends in Cognitive Sciences8, 494–500.
15.
HuangL.HolcombeA. O.PashlerH. (2004). Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming.Memory & Cognition32, 12–20.
16.
HuettelS. A.LockheadG. R. (1999). Range effects of an irrelevant dimension on classification.Perception and Psychophysics61, 1624–1645.
17.
JolicœurP. (1999). Concurrent response-selection demands modulate the processing blink.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance25, 1097–1113.
18.
KahnemanD. (1973). Attention and effortNew York: Prentice-Hall.
19.
KruegerL. E. (1970). Effect of stimulus probability on two-choice reaction time.Journal of Experimental Psychology84, 377–379.
20.
KrugerL. E.ShapiroR. G. (1981). Intertrial effects of same–different judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology33A, 241–265.
21.
KubovyM. (1981). Concurrent-pitch segregation and the theory of indispensable attributes.KubovyM.PomerantzJ. R.Perceptual organizationHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates55–98.
22.
KubovyM.Van ValkenburgD. (2001). Auditory and visual objects.Cognition80, 97–126.
23.
LaBergeD.TweedyJ. R. (1964). Presentation probability and choice time.Journal of Experimental Psychology68, 477–481.
24.
LavieN. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 451–468.
25.
LavieN. (2005). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.Trends in Cognitive Sciences9, 75–82.
26.
LavieN.HirstA.de FockertJ.VidingE. (2004). Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General133, 339–354.
27.
LeboeL. C.MondorT. A. (2007). Item-specific congruency effects in nonverbal auditory Stroop.Psychological Research71, 568–575.
28.
LeutholdH.SommerW. (1993). Stimulus presentations dissociates sequential effects in event-related potentials and reaction times.Psychophysiology30, 510–517.
29.
MaljkovicV.NakayamaK. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition22, 657–672.
30.
MaljkovicV.NakayamaK. (1996). Priming of popout: II. The role of position.Perception & Psychophysics58, 977–991.
31.
MaljkovicV.NakayamaK. (2000). Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection.Visual Cognition7, 571–595.
32.
MelaraR. D.MarksL. E. (1990). Dimensional interactions in language processing: Investigating directions and levels of crosstalk.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition16, 539–554.
33.
MelaraR. D.MountsJ. R. W. (1993). Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice.Memory and Cognition21, 627–645.
34.
MondorT. A.HurlburtJ.ThorneL. (2003). Categorizing sounds by pitch: Effects of stimulus similarity and response repetition.Perception & Psychophysics65, 107–114.
35.
MondorT. A.LeboeL. C. (2008). Stimulus and responses repetition effects in the detection of sounds: Evidence of obligatory retrieval and use of a prior event.Psychological Research72, 183–191.
36.
MondorT. A.ZatorreR. J.TerrioN. A. (1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 66–79.
37.
MordkoffJ. T.YantisS. (1991). An interactive race model of divided attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 520–538.
38.
MordkoffJ. T.YantisS.EgethH. E. (1990). Detecting conjunctions of color and form in parallel.Perception & Psychophysics48, 157–168.
39.
MuddS. A. (1963). Spatial stereotypes of four dimensions of pure tone.Journal of Experimental Psychology66, 347–352.
40.
MüllerH. J.HellerD.ZieglerJ. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics57, 1–17.
41.
MüllerH. J.ReimannB.KrummenacherJ. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29, 1021–1035.
42.
NäätänenR.PorkkaR.MerisaloA.AhtolaS. (1980). Location vs. frequency of pure tones as a basis of fast discrimination.Acta Psychologica44, 31–40.
43.
OliversC. N. L.HumphreysG. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29, 650–657.
44.
PashlerH.BaylisG. (1991). Procedural learning: 2. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition17, 33–48.
45.
PatchingG. R.QuinlanP. T. (2002). Garner and congruency effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28, 755–775.
46.
PictonT. W.AlainC.OttenL.RitterW.AchimA. (2000). Mismatch negativity: Different water in the same river.Audiology and Neuro-Otology5, 111–139.
47.
PollmannS.WeidnerR.MüllerH. J.von CramonD. Y. (2000). A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience12, 480–494.
48.
PomerantzJ. R. (1983). Global and local precedence: Selective attention in form and motion perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General112, 515–540.
49.
QuinlanP. T. (1999). Sequential effects in auditory choice reaction time tasks.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review6, 297–303.
50.
RabbittP. (1992). Many happy repetitions: A celebration of the “Bertelson Repetition Effect” 1961–1991.AlegriaJ.HolenderD.Junca de MoraisJ.RadeauM.Analytic approaches to human cognitionAmsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers313–330.
51.
RusconiE.KwanB.GiordanoB. L.UmiltaC.ButterworthB. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height.Cognition99, 113–129.
52.
SabriM.CampbellK. M. (2001). Effects of sequential and temporal probability of deviant occurrence on mismatch negativity.Cognitive Brain Research12, 171–180.
53.
SchrögerE. (1995). Processing of auditory deviants with changes in one versus two stimulus dimensions.Psychophysiology32, 55–65.
54.
SchrögerE.WolffC. (1997). Fast preattentive processing of location: A functional basis for selective listening in humans.Neuroscience Letters232, 5–8.
55.
SpenceC. J.DriverJ. (1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 555–574.
56.
van SelstM.JolicœurP. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology47A, 631–650.
57.
Visscher, K.M., Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2009). Trial-to-trial carry-over of item- and relational-information in auditory short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 46–56.
58.
WalkerB. N.EhrensteinA. (2000). Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied6, 15–30.
59.
WanatabeT. (1988). Effect of irrelevant differences as a function of the relations between relevant and irrelevant dimensions in the same–different task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14, 132–142.
60.
WardT. B. (1983). Response tempo and separable-integral responding: Evidence for an integral-to-separable processing sequence in visual perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9, 103–112.
61.
WoodsD. L.AlainC.DiazR.RhodesD.OgawaK. H. (2001). Location and frequency cues in auditory selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27, 65–74.
62.
ZmigrodS.HommelB. (2009). Auditory event files: Integrating auditory perception and action planning.Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics71, 352–362.
