In virtual-environment spatial-learning procedures, Experiment 1 investigated blocking of learning about distal landmarks beyond the walls of an enclosure following preliminary training to find a goal using local landmarks within the enclosure. Separate sets of blocking and control groups searched within enclosures that, in plan view, formed either a square or a circle. Blocking was apparent when training and testing occurred in the circular but not the square enclosure. In Experiment 2, preliminary training to find a goal using local landmarks blocked spatial learning based on a circular enclosure divided into four differently coloured sections. The results are discussed in relation to theories of incidental versus error-correcting learning linked to different types of spatial cue.
AlexanderT.WilsonS. P.WilsonP. N. (2009). Blocking of goal-location learning based on shape.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition35, 694–708.
2.
BieglerR.MorrisR. G. M. (1999). Blocking in the spatial domain with arrays of discrete landmarks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes25, 3334–351.
3.
BoutonM. E.DunlapC. M.SwartzentruberD. (1987). Potentiation of taste by another taste during compound aversion learning.Animal Learning and Behavior15, 433–438.
4.
ChamizoV. D. (2003). Acquisition of knowledge about spatial location: Assessing the generality of the mechanism of learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56B, 102–113.
5.
ChamizoV. D.Aznar-CasanovaJ. A.ArtigasA. A. (2003). Human overshadowing in a virtual pool: Simple guidance is a good competitor against locale learning.Learning and Motivation34, 262–281.
6.
ChengK. (1986). A purely geometric model in the rat's spatial representation.Cognition23, 149–178.
7.
ChengK.GallistelC. R. (2005). Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: Comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi and Polli (2004).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes31, 254–259.
8.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT. (2002). A review of recent developments in research and theories on human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55B, 289–310.
9.
DickinsonAShanksDEvendenJ. (1984). Judgment of act–outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 29–50.
10.
DoellerC. F.BurgessN. (2008). Distinct error-correcting and incidental learning of location relative to landmarks and boundaries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences105, 5909–5914.
11.
GallistelR. (1990). The organization of learningCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
HamiltonD. A.JohnsonT. E.RedheadE. S.VerneyS. P. (2009). Control of rodent and human spatial navigation by room and apparatus cues.Behavioral Processes81, 154–169.
13.
HamiltonD. A.SutherlandR. J. (1999). Blocking in human place learning: Evidence from virtual navigation.Psychobiology27, 453–461.
14.
HartleyT.TrinklerI.BurgessN. (2004). Geometric determinants of human spatial memory.Cognition94, 39–75.
15.
HebbD. O. (1949). The organization of behaviorNew York: Wiley & Sons.
16.
JacobsJ. W.LauranceH. E.ThomasK. G. F. (1997). Place learning in virtual space: I. Acquisition, overshadowing, and transfer.Learning and Motivation28, 521–541.
17.
JacobsJ. W.ThomasK. G. F.LauranceH. E.NadelL. (1998). Place learning in virtual space: II. Topographical relations as one dimension of stimulus control.Learning and Motivation29, 288–308.
18.
KaminL. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning.CampbellB. A.ChurchR. M.Punishment and aversive behaviorNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts276–296.
19.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
20.
MackintoshN. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learningOxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
21.
MackintoshN. J. (2002). Do not ask whether they have a cognitive map, but how they find their way about.Psicológica23, 165–185.
22.
McGregorA.JonesP. M.GoodM. A.PearceJ. M. (2006). Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: Reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes32, 314–321.
23.
MorrisR. G. M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues.Learning and Motivation12, 239–260.
24.
O'KeefeJ.NadelL. (1978). The hippocampus as a cognitive mapOxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
25.
PavlovI. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexesNew York: Dover.
26.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review101, 587–607.
27.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model of Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditional stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–552.
28.
RedheadE. S.HamiltonD. A. (2007). Interaction between locale and taxon strategies in human spatial learning.Learning and Motivation38, 262–283.
29.
RedheadE. S.HamiltonD. A. (2009). Evidence of blocking with geometric cues in a virtual water maze.Learning and Motivation40, 15–34.
30.
RescorlaR. A.WagnerA. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement.BlackA. H.ProkasyW. F.Classical conditioning II: Current research and theoryNew York: Appleton-Century-Crofts64–99.
31.
Rizk-JacksonA. M.AcevedoS. F.InmanD.HowiesonD.BeniceT. S.RaberJ. (2006). Effects of sex on object recognition and spatial navigation in humans.Behavioural Brain Research173, 181–190.
32.
SandstromN. J.KaufmanJ.HuettelS. A. (1998). Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task.Cognitive Brain Research6, 351–360.
33.
ShanksD. R. (2007). Associationism and cognition: Human contingency learning at 25.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 3291–309.
34.
WilcoxR. R. (2001). Fundamentals of modern statistical methods: Substantially improving power and accuracyNew York: Springer.
35.
WilsonP. N.AlexanderT. (2008). Blocking of spatial learning between enclosure geometry and a local landmark.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition34, 1369–1376.
