Jamieson and Mewhort (2009a) demonstrated that performance in the artificial-grammar task could be understood using an exemplar model of memory. We reinforce the position by testing the model against data for individual test items both in a standard artificial-grammar experiment and in a string-completion variant of the standard procedure. We argue that retrieval is sensitive to structure in memory. The work ties performance in the artificial-grammar task to principles of explicit memory.
BrooksL. R. (1978). Nonanalytic concept formation and memory for instances.Cognition and categorization. RoschE.LloydB. B.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates169–211.
2.
BrooksL. R.VokeyJ. R. (1991). Abstract analogies and abstracted grammars: Comments on Reber (1989) and Mathews et al. (1989).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General120, 316–323.
3.
CleeremansA.DienesZ. (2008). Computational models of implicit learning.The Cambridge handbook of computational modeling. SunR.New York: Cambridge University Press396–421.
4.
CleeremansA.Servan-SchreiberD.McClellandJ. L. (1989). Finite state automata and simple recurrent networks.Neural Computation1, 372–381.
5.
DienesZ. (1992). Connectionist and memory-array models of artificial grammar learning.Cognitive Science16, 41–79.
6.
DienesZ.BroadbentD. E.BerryD. C. (1991). Implicit and explicit knowledge bases in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 875–887.
7.
DulanyD. E.CarlsonR. A.DeweyG. I. (1984). A case of syntactical learning and judgment: How conscious and how abstract?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General113, 541–555.
8.
EbbinghausH. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychologyNew York: Dover (Original work published 1885) (H. A. Ruger, Trans.).
9.
EstesW. K. (1986). Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General115, 155–174.
10.
FriendlyM.FranklinP. E.HoffmanD.RubinD. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation14, 375–399.
11.
HintzmanD. L. (1986). “Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review93, 411–428.
12.
HintzmanD. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review95, 528–551.
13.
JamiesonR. K.MewhortD. J. K. (2005). The influence of grammatical, local, and organizational redundancy on implicit learning: An analysis using information theory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 9–23.
14.
JamiesonR. K.MewhortD. J. K. (2009a). Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: Inferring grammaticality from similarity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62, 550–575.
15.
JamiesonR. K.MewhortD. J. K. (2009b). Applying an exemplar model to the serial reaction-time task: Anticipating from experience.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology62, 1757–1783.
16.
JohnstoneT.ShanksD. R. (2001). Abstractionist and processing accounts of implicit learning.Cognitive Psychology42, 61–112.
17.
KnowltonB. J.RamusS. J.SquireL. R. (1992). Intact artificial grammar learning in amnesia: Dissociation of classification learning and explicit memory for specific instances.Psychological Science3, 172–179.
18.
KnowltonB. J.SquireL. R. (1994). The information acquired during artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20, 79–91.
19.
KnowltonB. J.SquireL. R. (1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition22, 169–181.
20.
KuhnG.DienesZ. (2005). Implicit learning of non-local musical rules.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 1417–1432.
21.
ManzaL.ReberA. S. (1997). Representing artificial grammars: Transfer across stimulus forms and modalities.How implicit is implicit learning?. BerryD. C.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press73–106.
22.
MedinD. L.SchafferM. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review85, 207–238.
23.
MurdockB. (1995). Similarity in a distributed memory model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology39, 251–264.
24.
NosofskyR. M. (1988a). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14, 700–708.
25.
NosofskyR. M. (1988b). Similarity, frequency, and category representation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition14, 54–65.
26.
PothosE. M.BaileyT. M. (2000). The importance of similarity in artificial grammar learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 847–862.
27.
ReberA. S. (1967). Implicit learning of artificial grammars.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior6, 855–863.
28.
ReberA. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General118, 219–235.
29.
ReberA. S.AllenR. (1978). Analogic and abstraction strategies in synthetic grammar learning: A functionalist interpretation. Cognition.6, 189–221.
30.
RedingtonM.ChaterN. (1996). Transfer in artificial grammar learning: A reevaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General125, 123–138.
31.
RedingtonM.ChaterN. (2002). Knowledge representation and transfer in artificial grammar learning (AGL).Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical and computational consensus in the making. FrenchR. M.CleeremansA.Hove, UK: Psychology Press121–143.
32.
ShepardR. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.Science237, 1317–1323.
33.
TulvingE. (1985). Elements of episodic memoryOxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
TulvingE.SchacterD. L.StarkH. A. (1982). Priming effects in word-fragment completion are independent of recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition8, 336–342.
35.
VokeyJ. R.BrooksL. R. (1992). Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 328–344.
