Two experiments investigated associative priming with a letter-search prime task where either the prime and letter probe were presented simultaneously, or the letter probe appeared 200 ms (Experiment 1) or 300 ms (Experiment 2) after the prime. Weak associative priming was observed in both experiments, but unlike Stolz and Besner (1996) we found no evidence that priming was increased when the probe was delayed. However, strong associative priming was observed when a semantic decision had to be made on the prime (Experiment 3). Our results are consistent with an account where semantic activation of the prime occurs but its action on the target is suppressed by the prime task. The persistence of weak priming effects with the letter search task is explained in terms of the low-frequency items used.
BeckerC. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies.Memory & Cognition8, 6493–512.
2.
BodnerG. E.MassonM. E. J. (2003). Beyond spreading activation: An influence of relatedness proportion on masked semantic priming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review3, 645–692.
3.
CollinsA. M.LoftusE. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.Psychological Review82, 6407–428.
4.
de GrootA. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime–target pairs and the stimulus onset asynchrony of prime and target.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 253–280.
5.
den HeyerK.BriandK.DannenbringG. L. (1983). Strategic factors in a lexical-decision task—evidence for automatic and attention-driven processes.Memory & Cognition11, 374–381.
6.
FriedrichF. J.HenikA.TzelgovJ. (1991). Automatic processes in lexical access and spreading activation.Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance17, 33792–806.
7.
HeilM.RolkeB.PecchinendaA. (2004). Automatic semantic activation is no myth. Semantic context effects on the N400 in the letter-search task in the absence of response time effects.Psychological Science15, 852–857.
8.
HenikA.FriedrichF. J.KelloggW. (1983). The dependence of semantic relatedness effects upon prime processing.Memory & Cognition11, 366–373.
9.
HenikA.FriedrichF. J.TzelgovJ.TramerS. (1994). Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming.Memory & Cognition22, 157–168.
10.
HutchisonK. A.BoscoF. A. (2007). Congruency effects in the letter search task: Semantic activation in the absence of priming.Memory & Cognition35, 514–525.
11.
HutchisonK. A.NeelyJ. H.JohnsonJ. D. (2001). With great expectations can two “wrong”s prime a “right”?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition27, 1451–1463.
12.
KayeD. B.BrownS. W. (1985). Levels and speed of processing effects on word analysis.Memory & Cognition13, 425–434.
13.
KoriatA. (1981). Semantic facilitation in lexical decision as a function of prime–target association.Memory & Cognition9, 587–598.
14.
KüperK.HeilM. (2009). Electrophysiology reveals semantic priming at a short SOA irrespective of depth of prime processing.Neuroscience Letters453, 107–111.
15.
Mari-BeffaP.ValdesP.CullenD. J. D.CatenaA.HoughtonG. (2005). ERP analyses of task effects on semantic processing from words.Cognitive Brain Research23, 293–305.
16.
MassonM. E. J. (1995). A distributed model of semantic priming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition25, 776–794.
17.
MaxfieldL. M. (1997). Attention and semantic priming: A review of prime task effects.Consciousness and Cognition6, 204–218.
18.
McNamaraT. P. (2005). Semantic priming: Perspectives from memory and word recognitionNew York: Psychology Press.
19.
MossH.OlderL. (1996). Birkbeck word association normsHove, UK: Psychology Press.
20.
NeelyJ. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General106, 226–254.
21.
NeelyJ. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories.Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. BesnerD.HumphreysG. W.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates264–336.
22.
NeelyJ. H.KeefeD. E.RossK. L. (1989). Semantic context effects on visual word processing: A hybrid prospective/retrospective processing theory.The psychology of learning and motivation. BowerG. H.New York: Academic Press24, 207–248.
23.
NelsonD. L.McEvoyC. L.SchreiberT. A. (2004). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and fragment norms.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36, 402–407.
24.
OtsukaS.KawaguchiJ. (2007). Divided attention modulates semantic activation: Evidence from a nonletter-level prime task.Memory & Cognition35, 2001–2011.
25.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies.Spatial Vision4, 437–442.
26.
PlautD. C.Semantic and associative priming in a distributed attractor networkProceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesHillsdale, NJ199537–42.
27.
PosnerM. I.SnyderC. R. R. (1975). Facilitation and inhibition in the processing of signals.Attention and Performance VNew York: New York Press669–681.
28.
SeidenbergM. S.WatersG.SandersM.LangerP. (1984). Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition.Memory and Cognition12, 315–328.
29.
SmithM. C. (1979). Contextual facilitation in a letter search task depends on how the prime is processed.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5, 239–251.
30.
SmithM. C.BentinS.SpalekT. M. (2001). Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition27, 1289–1298.
31.
SmithM. C.TheodorL.FranklinP. E. (1983). The relationship between contextual facilitation and depth of processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition9, 697–712.
32.
StolzJ. A.BesnerD. (1996). Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 1166–1177.
33.
StolzJ. A.BesnerD. (1998). Levels of representation in visual word recognition: A dissociation between morphological and semantic processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 1642–1645.
34.
TseC.-S.NeelyJ. H. (2007). Semantic priming from letter-searched primes occurs for low- but not high-frequency targets: Automatic semantic access may not be a myth.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition33, 1143–1161.
35.
TweedyJ. R.LapinskiR.SchvaneveldtR. (1977). Semantic context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context.Memory & Cognition5, 84–89.
