In two experiments we examined whether the appearance of a new object has attentional priority over disappearance. Previous failures to show differences are possibly due to onsets and offsets always being presented as a sole visual transient. Rather than presenting each alone, we presented onset and offset singletons simultaneously with a display-wide luminance transient in order to force each to compete with other visual events. Results from Experiment 1 showed that targets associated with onsets accrued a reaction time benefit whilst targets associated with offsets did not. Experiment 2 showed that onsets attracted attention even when observers were attentionally set to look for offset. By contrast, offsets needed a relevant attentional set in order to attract attention. We argue that the appearance of an object has attentional priority over disappearance.
AbramsR. A.ChristS. E. (2005). The onset of receding motion captures attention: Comment on Franconeri and Simons (2003).Perception and Psychophysics67, 219–223.
2.
AllanL. G. (1975). The relationship between judgements of successiveness and judgments of order.Perception and Psychophysics18, 29–36.
3.
AtchleyP.KramerA. F.HillstromA. P. (2000). Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 594–606.
4.
BaconW. F.EgethH. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture.Perception and Psychophysics55, 485–496.
5.
BootW. R.KramerA. F.PetersonM. S. (2005). Oculomotor consequences of abrupt object onsets and offsets: Onsets dominate oculomotor capture.Perception and Psychophysics67, 910–928.
6.
BrockmoleJ. R.HendersonJ. M. (2005). Object appearance, disappearance, and attention prioritization in real-world scenes.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review12, 1061–1067.
7.
ChastainG.ChealM. (2001). Attentional capture with various distractor and target types.Perception and Psychophysics63, 979–990.
8.
ColeG. G.KentridgeR.GellatlyA.HeywoodC. (2003). Dectectability of onsets versus offsets in the change detection paradigm.Journal of Vision3, 22–31.
9.
ColeG. G.KentridgeR. W.HeywoodC. A. (2004). Visual salience in the change detection paradigm: The special role of object onset.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30, 464–477.
10.
ColeG. G.KentridgeR. W.HeywoodC. A. (2005). Object onset and parvocellular guidance of attentional allocation.Psychological Science16, 270–274.
11.
ColeG. G.KuhnG. (in press). Appearance matters: Attentional orienting by new objects in the precuing paradigm.Visual Cognition.
12.
ColeG. G.KuhnG.HeywoodC. A.KentridgeR. W. (2009). The prioritization of feature singletons in the allocation of visual attention.Experimental Psychology56, 134–146.
13.
ColeG. G.KuhnG.LiversedgeS. P. (2007). The onset of second-order contour attenuates change blindness.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14, 939–942.
14.
ColeG. G.LiversedgeS. L. (2006). Change blindness and the primacy of object appearance.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13, 588–593.
15.
DavoliC.SuszkoJ.AbramsR. (2007). New objects can capture attention without a unique luminance transient.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14, 338–343.
16.
Di LolloV.EnnsJ. T.YantisS.DechiefG. L. (2000). Response latencies to the onset and offset of visual stimuli.Perception and Psychophysics62, 218–225.
17.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W.JohnstonJ. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18, 1030–1044.
18.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W.WrightJ. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 317–329.
19.
FranconeriS. L.HollingworthA.SimonsD. J. (2005). Do new objects capture attention?.Psychological Science16, 275–282.
20.
FranconeriS. L.SimonsD. J. (2005). The dynamic events that capture visual attention: A reply to Abrams and Christ (2005).Perception & Psychophysics67, 962–966.
21.
FranconeriS. L.SimonsD. J. (2003). Motion and looming capture attention.Perception and Psychophysics65, 999–1010.
22.
GellatlyA. R. H.ColeG. G. (2000). Accuracy of target detection in new-object and old-object displays.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 889–899.
23.
GellatlyA. R. H.ColeG. G.BlurtonA. (1999). Do equiluminant object onsets capture visual attention?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 1609–1624.
24.
GibsonB. S. (1996). The masking account of attentional capture: A reply to Yantis and Jonides (1996).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance22, 1514–1520.
25.
HumphreysG. W.OliversC. N. L.YoonE. Y. (2006). An onset advantage without a preview benefit: Neuropsychological evidence separating onset and preview effects in search.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience18, 110–120.
26.
JonidesJ.YantisS. (1988). Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention.Perception & Psychophysics43, 346–354.
27.
KahnemanD.TreismanA.GibbsB. J. (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information.Cognitive Psychology24, 175–219.
28.
Martin-EmersonR.KramerA. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets.Perception and Psychophysics59, 739–751.
29.
MillerJ. (1989). The control of attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets.Perception & Psychophysics45, 567–571.
30.
PosnerM. I.CohenY. (1984). Components of attention.Attention and Performance X. BoumaH.BouwhuisD.Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates55–66.
31.
PrattJ.ArnottS. R. (2008). Modulating the attentional repulsion effect.Acta Psychologica127, 137–145.
32.
PrattJ.HirshhornM. (2003). Examining the time course of facilitation and inhibition with simultaneous onsets and offset cues.Psychological Research67, 261–265.
33.
PrattJ.McAuliffeJ. (2001). The effects of onset and offset on visual attention.Psychological Research65, 185–191.
34.
PrattJ.TrottierL. (2005). Pro-saccades and anti-saccades to onset and offset targets.Vision Research45, 765–774.
35.
RensinkR. A.O'ReganJ. K.ClarkJ. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes.Psychological Science8, 368–373.
36.
RiggioL.BelloA.UmiltàC. (1998). Inhibitory and facilitatory effects of cue onset and offset.Psychological Research61, 107–118.
37.
SamuelA. G.WeinerS. K. (2001). Attentional consequences of object appearance and disappearance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27, 1433–1451.
38.
SimonsD. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail.Psychological Science7, 301–305.
39.
SimonsD. J.RensinkR. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future.Trends in Cognitive Sciences9, 16–20.
40.
StelmachL. B.HerdmanC. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 539–550.
41.
SternbergS.KnollR. L. (1973). The perception of temporal order: Further issues and a general model.Attention and Performance IV. KornblumS.New York: Academic Press629–685.
42.
SuzukiS.CavanaghP. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance23, 443–463.
43.
TheeuwesJ. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets.Perception and Psychophysics49, 83–90.
44.
TheeuwesJ.GodijnR. (2002). Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return.Perception & Psychophysics64, 764–770.
45.
TitchenerE. B. (1901). Experimental psychologyNew York: Macmillan.
46.
UlrichR. (1987). Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task.Perception & Psychophysics42, 224–239.
47.
Vingilis-JaremkoL.FerberS.PrattJ. (2008). Better late than never: How onsets and offsets influence prior entry and exit.Psychological Research72, 443–450.
48.
WatsonD. G.HumphreysG. W. (1995). Attention capture by contour onsets and offsets: No special role for onsets.Perception & Psychophysics57, 583–597.
YantisS. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance19, 676–681.
51.
YantisS.HillstromA. P. (1994). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: Evidence from equiluminant visual objects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 95–107.
52.
YantisS.JohnsonD. N. (1990). Mechanisms of attentional priority.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16, 812–825.
53.
YantisS.JonidesJ. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance10, 601–621.
54.
YantisS.JonidesJ. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary versus automatic allocation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance16, 121–134.
