Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German

Abstract

Reading times for the second conjunct of and-coordinated clauses are faster when the second conjunct parallels the first conjunct in its syntactic or semantic (animacy) structure than when its structure differs (Frazier, Munn, & Clifton, 2000; Frazier, Taft, Roeper, & Clifton, 1984). What remains unclear, however, is the time course of parallelism effects, their scope, and the kinds of linguistic information to which they are sensitive. Findings from the first two eye-tracking experiments revealed incremental constituent order parallelism across the board—both during structural disambiguation (Experiment 1) and in sentences with unambiguously case-marked constituent order (Experiment 2), as well as for both marked and unmarked constituent orders (Experiments 1 and 2). Findings from Experiment 3 revealed effects of both constituent order and subtle semantic (noun phrase similarity) parallelism. Together our findings provide evidence for an across-the-board account of parallelism for processing and-coordinated clauses, in which both constituent order and semantic aspects of representations contribute towards incremental parallelism effects. We discuss our findings in the context of existing findings on parallelism and priming, as well as mechanisms of sentence processing.

Keywords

Psycholinguistics Sentence processing Syntactic coordination Constituent order Semantic parallelism Eye tracking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altmann

G. T. M.

Garnham

Dennis

(1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language 31, 685–712.

Altmann

G. T. M.

Steedman

(1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30, 191–238.

Anisfeld

Klenbort

(1973). On the function of structural paraphrase: The view from the passive voice. Psychological Bulletin 79, 117–126.

Apel

Knoeferle

Crocker

M. W.

Processing parallel structure: Evidence from eye tracking and a computational model

Proceedings of the 2nd European Cognitive Science Conference. London Vosniadou

Kayser

Protopapas

Taylor & Francis

2007 125–131.

Arai

Gompel

R. P. G.

Scheepers

(2007). Priming ditransitive structures in comprehension. Cognitive Psychology 54, 218–250.

Baayen

(2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Bader

Meng

(1999). Subject–object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28, 121–143.

Bates

(2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R: Using the lme4 package. R News 5, 27–30.

Bornkessel

Schlesewsky

Friederici

A. D.

(2003). Contextual information modulates initial processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter-versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 871–882.

10.

Branigan

Pickering

M. J.

McLean

(2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31, 468–481.

11.

Callahan

Shapiro

L. P.

Love

(2008). The activation of verbs in sentences involving verb phrase anaphors Manuscript submitted for publication.

12.

Carlson

(2001). The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Language and Speech 44, 1–26.

13.

Carlson

Dickey

M. W.

Frazier

Clifton

(2008). Information structure expectations in sentence comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 62, 114–139.

14.

Clark

H. H.

Haviland

S. E.

(1977). Comprehension and the given-new contract. Discourse production and comprehension. Freedle

R. O.

Norwood, NJ: Ablex 1–40.

15.

Clifton

Traxler

M. J.

Mohamed

T. M.

Williams

R. S.

Morris

R. K.

Rayner

(2003). The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and Language 49, 317–334.

16.

Cohen

(1973). Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 33, 107–112.

17.

Crocker

M. W.

(1996). Computational psycholinguistics: An interdisciplinary approach to the study of language Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

18.

Crocker

M. W.

Brants

(2000). Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 647–669.

19.

Dunbey

Keller

Sturt

(2008). A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism. Cognition 109, 326–344.

20.

Frazier

Clifton

(1996). Construal Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

21.

Frazier

Clifton

(2001). Parsing coordinates and ellipsis: Copyα. Syntax 4, 1–22.

22.

Frazier

Fodor

(1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6, 291–325.

23.

Frazier

Munn

Clifton

(2000). Processing coordinate structures. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29, 343–370.

24.

Frazier

Rayner

(1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology 14, 178–210.

25.

Frazier

Taft

Roeper

Clifton

(1984). Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension. Memory and Cognition 12, 421–430.

26.

Gibson

(1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 1–76.

27.

Hale

A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model

Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on language technologies. Morristown, NJ: Association for Computational Linguistics 2001 1–8.

28.

Hale

(2003). The information conveyed by words in sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32, 101–123.

29.

Hemforth

(1993). Kognitives Parsing: Repräsentation und Verarbeitung sprachlichen Wissens [Cognitive parsing: Representation and processing of linguistic knowledge] Sankt Augustin, Germany: Infix-Verlag.

30.

Jaeger

T. F.

(2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformations or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–446.

31.

Jurafsky

(1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science 20, 137–194.

32.

Konieczny

Hemforth

Scheepers

Strube

(1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing: Evidence from German. Language and Cognitive Processes 12, 307–348.

33.

Ledoux

Traxler

M. J.

Swaab

T. Y.

(2007). Syntactic priming in comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science 18, 135–143.

34.

Levy

(2008). Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106, 1126–1177.

35.

Liversedge

S. P.

Paterson

K. B.

Pickering

M. J.

(1998). Eye movements and measures of reading time. Eye guidance in reading and scene perception. Underwood

Oxford, UK: Elsevier 55–75.

36.

MacDonald

M. C.

Pearlmutter

N. J.

Seidenberg

M. S.

(1994). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101, 676–703.

37.

Martin

A. E.

McElree

(2008). A content-addressable pointer mechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language 58, 879–906.

38.

McRae

Spivey-Knowlton

M. J.

Tanenhaus

M. K.

(1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 38, 283–312.

39.

Mecklinger

Schriefers

Steinhauer

Friederici

A. D.

(1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition 23, 477–497.

40.

Meyer

Schvanefeldt

(1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90, 227–234.

41.

Mitchell

D. C.

Cuetos

Corley

Brysbaert

(1995). Exposure-based models of human parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24, 469–488.

42.

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

(1998). The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic persistence in written language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 633–651.

43.

Pickering

M. J.

Branigan

(1999). Syntactic priming in language production. Trends in Cognitive Science 3, 136–141.

44.

Pickering

M. J.

Traxler

M. J.

Crocker

M. W.

(2000). Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: Evidence against frequency-based accounts. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 447–475.

45.

Pierce

C. A.

Block

R. A.

Aguinis

(2004). Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64, 916–924.

46.

Pinheiro

J. C.

Bates

D. M.

(2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-Plus New York: Springer.

47.

Pritchett

B. L.

(1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

48.

Rayner

(1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin 124, 372–422.

49.

Rayner

Duffy

S. A.

(1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 14, 191–201.

50.

Rayner

Sereno

(1994). Regressive eye movements and sentence parsing: On the use of regression-contingent analyses. Memory & Cognition 22, 281–285.

51.

Scheepers

Crocker

M. W.

(2004). Constituent order priming from reading to listening: A visual-world study. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond. Carreiras

Clifton

New York: Psychology Press 167–185.

52.

Schlesewsky

Fanselow

Kliegl

Krems

(2000). The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in German. German sentence processing. Hemforth

Konieczny

Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer 65–94.

53.

Schriefers

Friederici

A. D.

Kuhn

(1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 499–520.

54.

Selkirk

E. O.

(1984). Phonology and syntax: The relation between sound and structure Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

55.

Steedman

(2000). Information structure and the syntax–phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry 31, 649–689.

56.

Tabachnik

Fidell

L. S.

(2007). Experimental design using ANOVA Belmont, CA: Duxbury.

57.

Tanenhaus

M. K.

Spivey-Knowlton

M. J.

Eberhard

Sedivy

J. C.

(1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268, 632–634.

58.

Townsend

D. J.

Bever

T. G.

(2001). Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

59.

Traxler

M. J.

(2008). Lexically independent priming in online sentence comprehension. Psychological Bulletin and Review 15, 149–155.

60.

Traxler

M. J.

Morris

R. K.

Seely

R. E.

(2002). Processing subjects and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 47, 69–90.

61.

Traxler

M. J.

Pickering

M. J.

Clifton

(1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 558–592.

62.

Trueswell

J. C.

(1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 35, 566–585.

63.

Trueswell

J. C.

Tanenhaus

M. K.

Garnsey

S. M.

(1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 285–318.

64.

Van Gompel

R. P. G.

Pickering

M. J.

Traxler

M. J.

(2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory and Language 45, 225–258.