A largely unexplored aspect of lexical access in visual word recognition is “semantic size”—namely, the real-world size of an object to which a word refers. A total of 42 participants performed a lexical decision task on concrete nouns denoting either big or small objects (e.g., bookcase or teaspoon). Items were matched pairwise on relevant lexical dimensions. Participants’ reaction times were reliably faster to semantically “big” versus “small” words. The results are discussed in terms of possible mechanisms, including more active representations for “big” words, due to the ecological importance attributed to large objects in the environment and the relative speed of neural responses to large objects.
BarsalouL. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences22, 577–660.
2.
BarsalouL. W. (2008). Grounded cognition.Annual Review of Psychology59, 617–645.
3.
BeattieG.ShoveltonH. (1999). Mapping the range of information contained in the iconic hand gestures that accompany spontaneous speech.Journal of Language and Social Psychology18, 438–462.
4.
BirdH.FranklinS.HowardD. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers33, 73–79.
5.
BrightP.MossH. E.LongeO.StamatakisE. A.TylerL. K. (2007). Conceptual structure modulates anteromedial temporal involvement in processing verbally presented object properties.Cerebral Cortex17, 1066–1073.
6.
BrunerJ. S.GoodmanC. C. (1947). Value and need as organizing factors in perception.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology42, 33–44.
7.
BubD. N.MassonM. E. J.CreeG. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words.Cognition106, 27–58.
8.
CohenJ. D.MacWhinneyB.FlattM.ProvostJ. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers25, 257–271.
9.
CorteseM. J.FugettA. (2004). Imageability ratings for 3,000 monosyllabic words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers36, 384–387.
10.
DehaeneS.BossiniS.GirauxP. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General122, 371–396.
11.
FischerM. H. (2001). Number processing induces spatial performance biases.Neurology57, 822–826.
12.
FischerM. H.ZwaanR. A. (2008). Embodied language: A review of the role of the motor system in language comprehension.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology61, 825–850.
13.
GilhoolyK. J.LogieR. H. (1980). Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation12, 395–427.
14.
GlenbergA. M.KaschakM. P. (2002). Grounding language in action.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review9, 558–565.
15.
GloverS.RosenbaumD. A.GrahamJ.DixonP. (2004). Grasping the meaning of words.Experimental Brain Research154, 103–108.
16.
GreenbergJ. H. (1966). Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchiesThe Hague: Mouton.
17.
JakobsonR.HalleM. (1956). Fundamentals of languageThe Hague: Mouton.
18.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychologyCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983.
19.
JohnstonR. A.BarryC. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing.Visual Cognition13, 789–845.
20.
JuhaszB. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification.Psychological Bulletin131, 684–712.
21.
KosslynS. M.ThompsonW. L. (2003). When is early visual cortex activated during visual mental imagery?.Psychological Bulletin129, 723–746.
22.
LakoffG. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous thingsChicago: University of Chicago Press.
23.
MorrisonC. M.ChappellT. D.EllisA. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology50A, 528–559.
24.
MossH. E.TylerL. K.TaylorK. I. (2007). Conceptual structure.GaskellG.The Oxford handbook of psycholinguisticsNew York: Oxford University Press217–234.
25.
NuerkH.-C.IversenW.WillmesK. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A, 835–863.
26.
PavioA. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.Memory & Cognition3, 635–647.
27.
PickeringM. J.GarrodS. (in press). Prediction and embodiment in dialogue.European Journal of Social Psychology.
28.
PosnerM. I.AbdullaevY. G.McCandlissB. D.SerenoS. C. (1999). Neuroanatomy, circuitry and plasticity of word reading.NeuroReport10, R12–R23.
29.
PulvermüllerF. (1999). Words in the brain's language.Behavioral Brain Sciences22, 253–336.
30.
PulvermüllerF. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action.Nature Reviews Neuroscience6, 576–582.
31.
PulvermüllerF.HaukO. (2006). Category-specific conceptual processing of color and form in left fronto-temporal cortex.Cerebral Cortex16, 1193–1201.
32.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin124, 372–422.
33.
RaynerK.SerenoS. C. (1994). Eye movements and reading: Psycholiniguistic studies.GernsbacherM. A.Handbook of psycholinguisticsNew York: Academic Press57–81.
34.
RoyD. (2005). Grounding words in perception and action: Computational insights.Trends in Cognitive Sciences9, 389–396.
35.
RubinstenO.HenikA. (2002). Is an ant larger than a lion?.Acta Psychologica111, 141–154.
36.
SalmelinR.KujalaJ. (2006). Neural representation of language: Activation versus long-range connectivity.Trends in Cognitive Sciences10, 519–525.
37.
SerenoM. E. (1993). Neural computation of pattern motionCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38.
SerenoS. C.RaynerK. (2003). Measuring word recognition in reading: Eye movements and event-related potentials.Trends in Cognitive Sciences7, 489–493.
39.
ShobenE. J.WilsonT. L. (1998). Categorization in judgments of relative magnitude.Journal of Memory and Language38, 94–111.
40.
Stadthagen-GonzalezH.DavisC. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity.Behavior Research Methods38, 598–605.
41.
TettamantiM.BuccinoG.SaccumanM. C.GalleseV.DannaM.ScifoP.FazioF.RizzolattiG.CappaS. F.PeraniD. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17, 273–281.
42.
TinbergenN.PerdeckA. (1950). On the stimulus situation releasing the begging response in the newly hatched herring gull chick (Larus a. argentatus Pont).Behaviour3, 1–39.
43.
TuckerM.EllisR. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects.Acta Psychologica116, 185–203.
44.
WilsonM. D. (1988). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database: Machine readable dictionary, Version 2.Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers20, 6–11.
45.
ZwaanR. A.TaylorL. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General135, 1–11.
