Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task

Abstract

This study investigated whether the mental representation of the fraction magnitude was componential and/or holistic in a numerical comparison task performed by adults. In Experiment 1, the comparison of fractions with common numerators (x/a_x/b) and of fractions with common denominators (a/x_b/x) primed the comparison of natural numbers. In Experiment 2, fillers (i.e., fractions without common components) were added to reduce the regularity of the stimuli. In both experiments, distance effects indicated that participants compared the numerators for a/x_b/x fractions, but that the magnitudes of the whole fractions were accessed and compared for x/a_x/b fractions. The priming effect of x/a_x/b fractions on natural numbers suggested that the interference of the denominator magnitude was controlled during the comparison of these fractions. These results suggested a hybrid representation of their magnitude (i.e., componential and holistic). In conclusion, the magnitude of the whole fraction can be accessed, probably by estimating the ratio between the magnitude of the denominator and the magnitude of the numerator. However, adults might prefer to rely on the magnitudes of the components and compare the magnitudes of the whole fractions only when the use of a componential strategy is made difficult.

Keywords

Numerical cognition Fractions Magnitude comparison Distance effect Congruity effect

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Behr

M. J.

Harel

Post

Lesh

(1992). Rational number, ratio, and proportion. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. A project of the national council of teachers of mathematics. Grouws

D. A.

New York: Simon and Schuster Macmillan 296–333.

Bonato

Fabbri

Umiltà

Zorzi

(2007). The mental representation of numerical fractions: Real or integer?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33, 1410–1419.

Dehaene

Bossini

Giraux

(1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 122, 371–396.

Dehaene

Dupoux

Mehler

(1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 16, 626–641.

English

L. D.

Halford

G. S.

(1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Field

(2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS London: Sage.

Fischer

M. H.

Rottmann

(2005). Do negative numbers have a place on the mental number line?. Psychology Science 47, 22–32.

Gallistel

C. R.

Gelman

(2000). Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 59–65.

Gallistel

C. R.

Gelman

Cordes

The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers

Culture and evolution: A Fyssen Foundation symposium. Cambridge, MA Jaisson

Levinson

S. C.

MIT Press

2005 247–274.

10.

Gevers

Lammertyn

(2005). The hunt for SNARC. Psychology Science 47, 10–21.

11.

Grégoire

Meert

(2005). L'apprentissage des nombres rationnels et ses obstacles [Rational number learning and its obstacles]. La dyscalculie. Trouble du développement numérique chez l'enfant. Noël

M. P.

Marseille, France: Solal 223–251.

12.

Hair

J. F.

Anderson

R. E.

Tatham

R. L.

Black

W. C.

(1998). Multivariate data analysis Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

13.

Hartnett

Gelman

(1998). Early understandings of numbers: Paths or barriers to the construction of new understandings?. Learning and Instruction 8, 341–374.

14.

Howell

D. C.

(1998). Méthodes statistiques en sciences humaines Bruxelles: De Boeck [Statistical methods for psychology] (M. Rogier, Trans.) (Original work published 1997.).

15.

Hubbard

E. M.

Piazza

Pinel

Dehaene

(2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6, 435–448.

16.

Mack

N. K.

(1993). Learning rational numbers with understanding: The case of informal knowledge. Rational numbers. An integration of research. Carpenter

T. P.

Fennema

Romberg

T. A.

Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 85–105.

17.

Moyer

R. S.

Landauer

T. K.

(1967). Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215, 1519–1520.

18.

Zhou

Y. D.

(2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist 40, 27–52.

19.

Nuerk

H. C.

Iversen

Willmes

(2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A, 835–863.

20.

Nuerk

H. C.

Weger

Willmes

(2001). Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins. Cognition 82, B25–B33.

21.

Nuerk

H. C.

Willmes

(2005). On the magnitude representations of two-digit numbers. Psychology Science 47, 52–72.

22.

Ratinckx

Brysbaert

Fias

(2005). Naming two-digit Arabic numerals: Evidence from masked priming studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, 1150–1163.

23.

Reynvoet

Brysbaert

(1999). Single-digit and two-digit Arabic numerals address the same semantic number line. Cognition 72, 191–201.

24.

Shaki

Petrusic

W. M.

(2005). On the mental representation of negative numbers: Context-dependent SNARC effects with comparative judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 931–937.

25.

Sophian

(1996). Children's numbers Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

26.

Stafylidou

Vosniadou

(2004). The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions. Learning and Instruction 14, 503–518.

27.

Tzelgov

Henik

(1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin 109, 524–536.

28.

Verguts

De Moor

(2005). Two-digit comparison: Decomposed, holistic, or hybrid?. Experimental Psychology 52, 195–200.

29.

Whalen

Gallistel

C. R.

Gelman

(1999). Nonverbal counting in humans: The psychophysics of number representation. Psychological Science 10, 130–137.

30.

Zhang

Wang

(2005). The effect of external representations on numeric tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 58A, 817–838.

31.

Zhou

Chen

Dong

(2008). Holistic or compositional representation of two-digit numbers? Evidence from the distance, magnitude, and SNARC effects in a number-matching task. Cognition 106, 1525–1536.