Spatial attention is oriented by social visual cues: targets appearing at cued (gazed-at) locations are detected more rapidly than those appearing at uncued locations. The current studies provide evidence that social gaze directs attention to auditory as well as visual targets at cued locations. For auditory target detection the effect lasted from 300 to 1,005 ms while for discrimination the effect was restricted to 600 ms. Improved performance at 600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony was observed across all experiments and may reflect an optimal processing window for social stimuli. In addition, the orienting of attention by gaze was impaired by the presentation of negative faces. These experiments further demonstrate the unique and cross-modal nature of social gaze cueing.
AkiyamaT.KatoM.MuramatsuT.SaitoF.UmedaS.KashimaH. (2006). Gaze but not arrows: A dissociative impairment after right superior temporal gyrus damage.Neuropsychologia44, 1804–1810.
2.
Baron-CohenS. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mindCambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
DoalloS.Lorenzo-LópezL.VizosoC.Rodríguez HolguínS.AmenedoE.BaráS. (2005). Modulations of the visual N! component of event-related potentials by central and peripheral cueing.Clinical Neurophysiology116, 807–820.
4.
DoiH.SawadaR.MasatakaN. (2007). The effects of eye and face inversion on the early stages of gaze direction perception—an ERP study.Brain Research1183, 83–90.
EmeryN. J. (2000). The eyes have it: The neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews24, 581–604.
7.
FarroniT.JohnsonM. H.BrockbankM.SimonF. (2000). Infants’ use of gaze direction to cue attention: The importance of perceived motion.Visual Cognition7, 705–718.
8.
FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (1998). The eyes have it!: Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review5, 490–495.
9.
FriesenC. K.KingstoneA. (2003). Abrupt onsets and gaze direction cues trigger independent reflexive attentional effects.Cognition87, B1–B10.
10.
FriesenC. K.RisticJ.KingstoneA. (2004). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30, 319–329.
11.
FrischenA.SmilekD.EastwoodJ. D.TipperS. P. (2007). Inhibition of return in response to gaze cues: The roles of time course and fixation cue.Visual Cognition15, 881–895.
12.
GasparC. M.BennettP. J.SekulerA. B. (2008). The effects of face inversion and contrast-reversal on efficiency and internal noise.Vision Research48, 1084–1095.
13.
KleinkeC. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review.Psychological Bulletin100, 78–100.
14.
PosnerM. I.CohenY. (1984). Components of visual orienting.BoumaH.BowhuisD. G.Attention and performance X. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates531–556.
15.
RicciardelliP.DriverJ. (2003). Effeto del movimento apparente degli occhi sulla percezione dello sguardo.Giornale Italiano di Psicologia4, 877–882.
16.
RisticJ.KingstoneA. (2005). Taking control of reflexive social attention.Cognition94, B55–B65.
17.
SchmittM.PostmaA.De HaanE. (2000). Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53A, 105–130.
18.
SchürmannM.GrumbtM.HeideW.VerlegerR. (2003). Effects of same- and different-modality cues in a Posner task: Extinction-type, spatial, and non-spatial deficits after right-hemispheric stroke.Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research16, 348–358.
19.
Soto-FaracoS.SinnettS.AlsiusA.KingstoneA. (2005). Spatial orienting of tactile attention induced by social cues.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review12, 1024–1031.
WardL. M. (1994). Supramodal and modality-specific mechanisms for stimulus-driven shifts of auditory and visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology48, 242–259.
22.
WardL. M.McDonaldJ. J.LinD. (2000). On asymmetries in cross-modal spatial attention orienting.Perception & Psychophysics62, 1258–1264.
