We presented three types of animations on an eye tracking monitor to 31 adult participants. In line with previous work, verbal descriptions of these animations indicate that one type (theory of mind or ToM) evokes mental state attributions, while another type (random) does not, with an intermediate category (goal-directed) evoking a moderate amount of mental state attributions. We expected longer fixations with greater depth of processing, which we assume is required for mental state attributions. In line with this expectation we found that the ToM animations invited long fixations; the random animations invited short fixations, while the goal-directed animations invited an intermediate amount of fixations, with some clips inviting shorter and others longer fixations. These findings demonstrate that it is possible to capture systematic differences in behaviour while viewing animations not only by means of a verbal measure, but also in terms of a simple measure of eye movements.
AbellF.HappéF.FrithU. (2000). Do triangles play tricks? Attribution of mental states to animated shapes in normal and abnormal development.Cognitive Development15, 1–16.
2.
Baron-CohenS.Tager-FlusbergH.CohenD. (2000). Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental neuroscience. (2nd. ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3.
BerryD. S.SpringerK. (1993). Structure, motion, and preschoolers perceptions of social causality.Ecological Psychology5, 273–283.
4.
BirdC. M.CastelliF.MalikO.FrithU.HusainM. (2004). The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on “theory of mind” and cognition.Brain127, 914–928.
5.
BowlerD.ThommenE. (2000). Attribution of mechanical and social causality to animated displays by children with autism.Autism4, 147–171.
6.
CampbellR.LawrenceK.MandyW.MitraC.JeyakumaL.SkuseD. (2006). Meanings in motion and faces: Developmental associations between the processing of intention from geometrical animations and gaze detection accuracy.Development and Psychopathology18, 99–118.
7.
CarrollP. J.YoungJ. R.GuertinM. S. (1992). Visual analysis of cartoons: A view from the Far Side.RaynerK.Eye movements and visual cognition. Scene perception and readingNew York: Springer.
8.
CastelliF.FrithC.HappéF.FrithU. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes.Brain125, 1839–1849.
9.
CastelliF.HappéF.FrithU.FrithC. (2000). Movement and mind: A functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns.NeuroImage12, 314–325.
10.
ChapmanP. R.UnderwoodG. (1998). Visual search of driving situations: Danger and experience.Perception27, 951–964.
11.
CrundallD. E.UnderwoodG. (1998). Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers.Ergonomics41, 448–458.
12.
FindlayJ. M.GilchristI. D. (2003). Active vision: The psychology of looking and seeingOxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
FrithU. (2001). Mind blindness and the brain in autism.Neuron32, 969–979.
14.
FrithU. (2003). Autism—explaining the enigma. (2nd. ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
15.
HeiderF.SimmelM. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior.American Journal of Psychology57, 243–259.
16.
HendersonJ. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences7, 498–504.
17.
HendersonJ. M. (2007). Regarding scenes.Current Directions in Psychological Science16, 219–222.
18.
IrwinD. E. (2004). Fixation location and fixation duration as indices of cognitive processing.The interface of language, vision, and actionHendersonJ. M.FerreiraF.New York: Psychology Press.
19.
KlinA. (2000). Attributing social meaning to ambiguous visual stimuli in higher-functioning autism and Asperger syndrome: the Social Attribution Task.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry7, 831–846.
20.
KnickmeyerR.Baron-CohenS.RaggattP.TaylorK.HackettG. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy.Hormones and Behavior49, 282–292.
21.
LandM. F.HayhoeM. (2001). In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?.Vision Research41, 3559–3565.
22.
LawrenceK.JonesA.OrelandL.SpektorD.MandyW.CampbellR. (2007). The development of mental state attributions in women with X-monosomy, and the role of monoamine oxidase B in the sociocognitive phenotype.Cognition102, 84–100.
23.
MoriguchiY.OhnishiT.LaneR. D.MaedaM.MoriT.NemotoK. (2006). Impaired self-awareness and theory of mind: An fMRI study of mentalizing in alexithymia.NeuroImage32, 1472–1482.
24.
MoriguchiY.OhnishiT.MoriT.MatsudaH.KomakiG. (2007). Changes of brain activity in the neural substrates for theory of mind during childhood and adolescence.Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences61, 355–363.
25.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review84, 231–259.
26.
RaynerK. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.Psychological Bulletin124, 372–422.
27.
RosenbaumR. S.StussD. T.LevineB.TulvingE. (2007). Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.Science318, 1257.
28.
RussellT. A.ReynaudE.HerbaC.MorrisR.CorcoranR. (2006). Do you see what I see? Interpretations of intentional movement in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia Research81, 101–111.
29.
SchwarzN. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist54, 93–105.
30.
UnderwoodG.ChapmanP. R.BowdenK.CrundallD. E. (2002). Visual search while driving: Skill and awareness during inspection of the scene.Transportation Research (F): Traffic Psychology and Behavior5, 87–97.
31.
UnderwoodG.JebbettL.RobertsK. (2004). Inspecting pictures for information to verify a sentence: Eye movements in general encoding and in focused search.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology57A, 165–182.
