The ability of the perturbation model (Jones & Wearden, 2003) to account for reference memory function in a visual temporal generalization task and auditory and visual reproduction tasks was examined. In all tasks the number of presentations of the standard was manipulated (1, 3, or 5), and its effect on performance was compared. In visual temporal generalization the number of presentations of the standard did not affect the number of times the standard was correctly identified, nor did it affect the overall temporal generalization gradient. In auditory reproduction there was no effect of the number of times the standard was presented on mean reproductions. In visual reproduction mean reproductions were shorter when the standard was only presented once; however, this effect was reduced when a visual cue was provided before the first presentation of the standard. Whilst the results of all experiments are best accounted for by the perturbation model there appears to be some attentional benefit to multiple presentations of the standard in visual reproduction.
BrunnerD.FairhurstS.StolovitskyG.GibbonJ. (1997). Mnemonics for variability: Remembering food delay.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes23, 68–83.
2.
ChurchR. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock.Timing and time perception. GibbonJ.AllanL. G.New York: New York Academy of Sciences566–582.
3.
CollierG. L.LoganG. (2000). Modality differences in short term memory for rhythms.Memory and Cognition28, 529–538.
4.
DrakeC.BotteM. C. (1993). Tempo sensitivity in auditory sequences: Evidence for a multiple look model.Perception and Psychophysics54, 277–286.
5.
Droit-VoletS. (2003). Alerting attention and time perception in children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology85, 372–384.
6.
Droit-VoletS.MeckW. H.PenneyT. B. (2007). Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults.Behavioral Processes74, 244.
7.
Droit-VoletS.WeardenJ. H. (2001). Temporal bisection in humans.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology80, 142–159.
8.
FortinC. (1999). Short-term memory in time interval production.International Journal of Psychology34, 308–316.
9.
FortinC.BretonR. (1995). Temporal interval production and processing in working memory.Perception and Psychophysics57, 203–215.
10.
FortinC.RousseauR. (1987). Time estimation as an index of processing demand in memory search.Perception and Psychophysics42, 377–382.
11.
FortinC.RousseauR. (1998). Interference from short-term memory processing on encoding and reproducing brief durations.Psychological Research61, 269–276.
12.
FortinC.RousseauR.BourqueP.KirouacE. (1993). Time estimation and concurrent non-temporal processing: Specific interference from short-term-memory demands.Perception and Psychophysics53, 536–548.
13.
GibbonJ. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber's law in animal timing.Psychological Review84, 279–325.
14.
GibbonJ.ChurchR. M.FairhurstS.KacelnikA. (1988). Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards.Psychological Review95, 102–114.
15.
GlenbergA. M.JonaM. (1991). Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects.Memory and Cognition5, 514–522.
16.
GoldstoneS.BoardmanW. K.LhamonW. T. (1959). Intersensory comparisons of temporal judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology57, 243–248.
17.
GoldstoneS.LhamonW. T. (1974). Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgement: 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights.Perceptual and Motor Skills39, 63–82.
18.
GrondinS. (2005). Overloading temporal reference memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance31, 869–879.
19.
IvryR. B.HazeltineR. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: Evidence for a common timing mechanism.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 3–18.
20.
JaskowskiP.JaroszykF.Hogan-JezierskaD. (1990). Temporal-order judgments and reaction time for stimuli of different modalities.Psychological Research52, 35–38.
21.
JonesL. A.WeardenJ. H. (2003). More is not necessarily better: Examining the nature of the temporal reference memory component in timing.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56B, 321–343.
22.
KlapprothF. (2002). The effect of study–test modalities on the remembrance of subjective duration from long-term memory.Behavioural Processes59, 37–46.
23.
LejeuneH. (1998). Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time.Behavioural Processes44, 127–145.
24.
LejeuneH. (2000). Prospective timing, attention and the switch. A response to ‘Gating or switching? gating is a better model of prospective timing’ by Zakay.Behavioural Processes52, 71–76.
25.
LejeuneH.FerraraA.SimonsF.WeardenJ. H. (1997). Adjusting to changes in the time of reinforcement: Peak-interval transitions in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes17, 281–291.
26.
McAuleyJ. D.KiddG. R. (1998). Effect of deviations from temporal expectations on tempo discrimination of isochronous tome sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 1786–1800.
27.
MeckW. H. (1983). Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes9, 171–201.
28.
MeckW. H. (1988). Hippocampal function is required for feedback control of an internal clock's criterion.Behavioural Neuroscience102, 54–60.
29.
MeckW. H.ChurchR. M.WenkG. L.OltonD. S. (1987). Nucleus basalis magnocellularis and medial septal area lesions differentially impair temporal memory.Journal of Neuroscience7, 3505–3511.
30.
NoulhianeM.PouthasV.SamsonS. (in press). Is time reproduction sensitive to sensory modalities?.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology.
31.
OgdenR. S.WeardenJ. H.JonesL. A. (2008). Are memories for duration modality specific? Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
OltonD. S. (1989). Frontal cortex, timing and memory.Neuropsychologia27, 121–130.
33.
PenneyT. B. (2003). Modality differences in interval timing: Attention, clock speed, and memory.Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing. MeckW. H.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press209–234.
34.
PenneyT. B.GibbonJ.MeckW. H. (2000). Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 1770–1787.
35.
PenneyT. B.TourretS. (2005). Les effets de la modalité sensorielle sur la perception du temps [Modality effect in short interval timing].Psychologie Française50, 131–143.
36.
Rodríguez-GironésM. A.KacelnikA. (1999). Behavioral adjustment to modifications in the temporal parameters of the environment.Behavioural Processes45, 173–191.
37.
SchulzeH. H. (1989). The perception of temporal deviations in isochronic patterns.Perception and Psychophysics45, 291–296.
38.
SebelA. J.WilsoncroftW. E. (1983). Auditory and visual differences in time perception.Perception and Motor Skills57, 295–300.
39.
WalkerJ. T.ScottK. J. (1981). Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance7, 1327–1339.
40.
WeardenJ. H. (2003). Applying the scalar timing model to human time psychology: Progress and challenges.Time and mind: II. Information-processing perspectives. HelfrichH.Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber21–39.
41.
WeardenJ. H.EdwardsH.FakhriM.PercivalA. (1998). Why “sounds are judged longer than lights”: Application of a model of the internal clock in humans.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology51B, 97–120.
42.
WeardenJ. H.JonesL. A. (2007). Is the growth of subjective time in humans a linear or non-linear function of real time?.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 1289–1302.
43.
WeardenJ. H.ToddN. P. M.JonesL. A. (2006). When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59, 1709–1724.
44.
WoodrowH. (1930). The reproduction of temporal intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology13, 473–499.
45.
ZakayD. (2000). Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to “switching or gating?” by Lejeune).Behavioural Processes52, 63–69.
46.
ZakayD.BlockR. A. (1997). Temporal cognition.Current Directions in Psychological Science6, 12–16.
