Short article: The effects of precedence on Navon-induced processing bias in face recognition

Abstract

Macrae and Lewis (2002) showed that repeated reporting of the global dimension of Navon stimuli improved performance in a subsequent face identification task, whilst reporting the features of the Navon stimuli impaired performance. Using a face composite task, which is assumed to require featural processing, Weston and Perfect (2005) showed the complementary pattern: Featural responding to Navon letters speeded performance. However, both studies used Navon stimuli with global precedence, in which the overall configuration is easier to report than the features. Here we replicate the two studies above, whilst manipulating the precedence (global or featural) of the letter stimuli in the orientation task. Both studies replicated the previously reported findings with global precedence stimuli, but showed the reverse pattern with local precedence stimuli. These data raise important questions as to what is transferred between the Navon orientation task and the face-processing tasks that follow.

Keywords

Face recognition Processing orientation Global processing Featural processing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dodson

C. S.

Johnson

M. K.

Schooler

J. W.

(1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory & Cognition 25, 129–139.

Dunning

Stern

L. B.

(1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 818–835.

Fallshore

Schooler

J. W.

(1995). Verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21, 1608–1623.

Lawson

(2007). Local and global processing biases fail to influence face, object and word recognition. Visual Cognition 15, 710–740.

Lewis

M. B.

(2006). Eye-witnesses should not do cryptic crosswords prior to identity parades. Perception 35, 1433–1436.

Macrae

C. N.

Lewis

H. L.

(2002). Do I know you? Processing orientation and face recognition. Psychological Science 13, 194–196.

Meissner

C. A.

(2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Conitive Psychology 16, 911–928.

Michel

Rossion

Han

Churg

C.-S.

Caldara

(2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one's own race. Psychological Science 17, 608–615.

Navon

(1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 9, 353–383.

10.

Parmentier

Andres

Switch cost asymmetry: Effects of task dominance

Poster presented at the annual meeting of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology. Granada, Spain September2003.

11.

Perfect

T. J.

(2003). Local processing bias impairs lineup performance. Psychological Reports 93, 393–394.

12.

Perfect

T. J.

Dennis

Snell

(2007). The effects of local and global processing bias on eyewitness identification performance. Memory 15, 784–798.

13.

Rhodes

Brake

Taylor

Tan

(1989). Expertise and holistic coding in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 80, 313–331.

14.

Schooler

J. W.

(2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology 16, 989–998.

15.

Schooler

J. W.

Engstler-Schooler

T. Y.

(1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology 22, 36–71.

16.

Tanaka

J. W.

Farah

M. J.

(1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46A, 225–245.

17.

Westerman

D. L.

Larsen

J. D.

(1997). Verbal overshadowing effect: Evidence for a general shift in processing. The American Journal of Psychology 110, 417–428.

18.

Weston

N. J.

Perfect

T. J.

(2005). The effects of processing bias on the composite effect. /precode>. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12, 1038–1042.

19.

Young

A. W.

Hellawell

Hay

D. C.

(1987). Holistic information in face perception. Perception 16, 747–759.