Short Article: Knowing When to Hear Aids What to Hear

Abstract

Temporal preparation often has been assumed to influence motor stages of information processing. Recent studies, however, challenge this notion and provide evidence for a facilitation of visual processing. The present study was designed to investigate whether perceptual processing in the auditory domain also benefits from temporal preparation. To this end, we employed a pitch discrimination task. In Experiment 1, discrimination performance was clearly improved when participants were temporally prepared. This finding was confirmed in Experiment 2, which ruled out possible influences of short-term memory. The results support the notion that temporal preparation enhances perceptual processing not only in the visual, but also in the auditory, modality.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bausenhart

K. M.

Rolke

Hackley

S. A.

Ulrich

(2006). The locus of temporal preparation effects: Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13, 536–542.

Cheal

M. L.

Lyon

D. R.

Hubbard

D. C.

(1991). Does attention have different effects on line orientation and line arrangement discrimination?. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43A, 825–857.

Correa

á.

Lupiáñez

Milliken

Tudela

(2004). Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 66, 264–278.

Correa

á.

Lupiáñez

Tudela

(2005). Attentional preparation based on temporal expectancy modulates processing at the perceptual level. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, 328–334.

Doherty

J. R.

Rao

Mesulam

M. M.

Nobre

A. C.

(2005). Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention. The Journal of Neuroscience 25, 8259–8266.

Hübner

Hafter

E. R.

(1995). Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 197–202.

Kaernbach

(1991). Simple adaptive testing with the weighted up-down method. Perception & Psychophysics 49, 227–229.

Mondor

T. A.

Zatorre

R. J.

(1995). Shifting and focusing auditory spatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 387–409.

Mondor

T. A.

Zatorre

R. J.

Terrio

N. A.

(1998). Constraints on the selection of auditory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 66–79.

10.

Moore

(1973). Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 610–619.

11.

Müller-Gethmann

Ulrich

Rinkenauer

(2003). Locus of the effect of temporal preparation: Evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Psychophysiology 40, 597–611.

12.

Näätänen

(1971). Non-aging fore-periods and simple reaction time. Acta Psychologica 35, 316–327.

13.

Näätänen

Muranen

Merisalo

(1974). Timing of expectancy peak in simple reaction time situation. Acta Psychologica 38, 461–470.

14.

Niemi

Näätänen

(1981). Foreperiod and simple reaction time. Psychological Bulletin 89, 133–162.

15.

Rolke

Hofmann

(2007). Temporal uncertainty degrades perceptual processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 522–526.

16.

Spence

C. J.

Driver

(1994). Covert spatial orienting in audition: Exogenous and endogenous mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 555–574.

17.

Spence

Driver

(1997). On measuring selective attention to an expected sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics 59, 389–403.

18.

Spence

Nicholls

M. E. R.

Gillespie

Driver

(1998). Cross-modal links in exogenous covert spatial orienting between touch, audition, and vision. Perception & Psychophysics 60, 544–557.

19.

Ward

L. M.

(1997). Involuntary listening aids hearing. Psychological Science 8, 112–118.

20.

Yeshurun

Carrasco

(1999). Spatial attention improves performance in spatial resolution tasks. Vision Research 39, 293–306.