Several theories of associative learning propose that blocking reflects changes in the processing devoted to learning about cues. The results of the only direct test of this suggestion in human learning (Kruschke & Blair, 2000) could equally well be explained in terms of, among others, interference in learning or memory. The present study tested this suggestion in a situation in which processing-change and interference accounts predict opposing results. Results support the idea that blocking in human learning can reflect a change in processing of the cues involved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AitkenM. R. F.LarkinM. J. W.DickinsonA. (2000). Super-learning of causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53B, 59–81.
2.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT. (2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56B, 345–357.
3.
HallG.MitchellC. J.GrahamS.LavisY. (2003). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in human discrimination learning: Evidence for associative mediation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General132, 266–276.
4.
KaminL. J.Attention-like processes in classical conditioning. InMiami symposium on the Prediction of Behavior: Aversive Stimulation. Coral Gables, FLJonesM. R.University of Miami Press19689–32.
5.
KruschkeJ. K. (2001). Towards a unified model of attention in associative learning.Journal of Mathematical Psychology45, 812–863.
6.
KruschkeJ. K.BlairN. J. (2000). Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review7, 636–645.
7.
Le PelleyE. M. (2004). The role of associative history in models of associative learning: A selective review and a hybrid model.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57B, 193–243.
8.
Le PelleyE. M.McLarenL. I.P. (2003). Learned associability and associative change in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56B, 68–79.
9.
Le PelleyE M.OakeshottS. M.McLarenL I.P. (2005). Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes31, 56–70.
10.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
11.
MackintoshN. J.TurnerC. (1971). Blocking as a function of novelty of CS and predictability of UCS.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology23, 359–366.
12.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–552.
13.
UnderwoodB. J. (1957). Interference and forgetting.Psychological Review64, 49–60.
14.
WaldmannM. R. (2000). Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 53–76.
