The “broken-mirror” theory of autism argues that dysfunction of the “mirror neuron system” is a root cause of social disability in autism. The present paper aims to scrutinize this theory and, when it breaks down, to provide an alternative. Current evidence suggests that children with autism are able to understand and emulate goal-directed actions, but may have specific impairments in automatic mimicry of actions without goals. These data are not compatible with the broken-mirror theory, but can be accounted for by a new model called EP-M. The EP-M model segments the mirror neuron system into an indirect, parietal route for goal emulation and planning (EP) and a direct occipital-frontal route for mimicry (M). This fractionation is consistent with neuroimaging and behavioural studies of the mirror neuron system in typical children and adults. I suggest that top-down modulation of the direct M route may be dysfunctional in individuals with autism, leading to abnormal behaviours on mimicry tasks as well as other social disabilities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldridgeM. A.StoneK. R.SweeneyM. H.BowerT. G. R. (2000). Preverbal children with autism understand the intentions of others.Developmental Science3, 294.
2.
AstafievS. V.StanleyC. M.ShulmanG. L.CorbettaM. (2004). Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions.Nature Neuroscience7, 542–548.
3.
AvikainenS.KulomakiT.HariR. (1999). Normal movement reading in Asperger subjects.Neuroreport10, 3467–3470.
4.
Aziz-ZadehL.KoskiL.ZaidelE.MazziottaJ.IacoboniM. (2006). Lateralization of the human mirror neuron system.Journal of Neuroscience26, 2964–2970.
5.
Baron-CohenS. (2002). The extreme male brain theory of autism.Trends in Cognitive Science6, 248–254.
6.
Baron-CohenS.LeslieA. M.FrithU. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?.Cognition21, 37–46.
7.
Baron-CohenS.RingH. A.BullmoreE. T.WheelwrightS.AshwinC.WilliamsS. C. (2000). The amygdala theory of autism.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Review24, 355–364.
8.
Beadle-BrownJ. D.WhitenA. (2004). Elicited imitation in children and adults with autism: Is there a deficit?.Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability29, 147–163.
9.
BehrmannM.ThomasC.HumphreysK. (2006). Seeing it differently: Visual processing in autism.Trends in Cognitive Science10, 258–264.
10.
BekkeringH.WohlschlägerA.GattisM. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology53A, 153–164.
11.
BirdG.CatmurC.SilaniG.FrithC.FrithU. (2006). Attention does not modulate neural responses to social stimuli in autism spectrum disorders.Neuroimage31, 1614–1624.
12.
BrassM.BekkeringH.PrinzW. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task.Acta Psychologica106, 3–22.
13.
BrassM.DerrfussJ.von CramonD. Y. (2005). The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation.Neuropsychologia43, 89–98.
14.
BuccinoG.BinkofskiF.FinkG. R.FadigaL.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2001). Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study.European Journal of Neuroscience13, 400–404.
15.
BuccinoG.BinkofskiF.RiggioL. (2004a). The mirror neuron system and action recognition.Brain and Language89, 370–376.
16.
BuccinoG.VogtS.RitzlA.FinkG. R.ZillesK.FreundH. J. (2004b). Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study.Neuron42, 323–334.
17.
BuxbaumL. J.KyleK. M.MenonR. (2005). On beyond mirror neurons: Internal representations subserving imitation and recognition of skilled object-related actions in humans.Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research25, 226–239.
18.
ByrneR. W.RussonA. E. (1998). Learning by imitation: A hierarchical approach.Behavioral and Brain Sciences21, 667–684;discussion 684–721.
19.
CarpenterM.PenningtonB. F.RogersS. J. (2001). Understanding of others’ intentions in children with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders31, 589–599.
20.
CastelliF.FrithC.HappéF.FrithU. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes.Brain125, 1839–1849.
21.
CataniM.JonesD. K.ffytcheD. H. (2005). Perisylvian language networks of the human brain.Annals of Neurology57, 8–16.
22.
CharmanT.SwettenhamJ.Baron-CohenS.CoxA.BairdG.DrewA. (1997). Infants with autism: An investigation of empathy, pretend play, joint attention, and imitation.Developmental Psychology33, 781–789.
23.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology76, 893–910.
24.
CsibraG. (2007). Action mirroring and action understanding: An alternative account.HaggardP.RossettiY.KawatoM.Attention and performance: XXII. Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognitionOxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
DaprettoM.DaviesM. S.PfeiferJ. H.ScottA. A.SigmanM.BookheimerS. Y. (2006). Understanding emotions in others: Mirror neuron dysfunction in children with autism spectrum disorders.Nature Neuroscience9, 28–30.
26.
DeMeyerM. K.AlpernG. D.BartonS.DeMyerW. E.ChurchillD. W.HingtgenJ. N. (1972). Imitation in autistic, early schizophrenic, and non-psychotic subnormal children.Journal of Autism and Childhood Schizophrenia2, 264–287.
27.
EhrssonH. H.FagergrenA.JonssonT.WestlingG.JohanssonR. S.ForssbergH. (2000). Cortical activity in precision- versus power-grip tasks: An fMRI study.Journal of Neurophysiology83, 528–536.
28.
FogassiL.FerrariP. F.GesierichB.RozziS.ChersiF.RizzolattiG. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding.Science308, 662–667.
29.
FrithU. (2003). Autism: Explaining the enigmaOxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
30.
FrithU.FrithC. D. (2003). Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B358, 459–473.
31.
FrithU.HappéF. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”.Cognition50, 115–132.
32.
FrithU.MortonJ.LeslieA. M. (1991). The cognitive basis of a biological disorder: Autism.Trends in Neuroscience14, 433–438.
33.
GalleseV. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.358, 517–528Series B.
34.
GalleseV.FadigaL.FogassiL.RizzolattiG. (1996). Action recognition in the premotor cortex.Brain119, 593–609.
35.
GalleseV.GoldmanA. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading.Trends in Cognitive Sciences2, 493–501.
36.
GalleseV.KeysersC.RizzolattiG. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition.Trends in Cognitive Sciences8, 396–403.
37.
GattisM.BekkeringH.WohlschlägerA. (2002). Goal directed imitation.MeltzoffA.PrinzW.The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
GraftonS. T.ArbibM. A.FadigaL.RizzolattiG. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by positron emission tomography. 2. Observation compared with imagination.Experimental Brain Research112, 103–111.
39.
GraftonS. T.MazziottaJ. C.WoodsR. P.PhelpsM. E. (1992). Human functional anatomy of visually guided finger movements.Brain115, 565–587.
40.
Grill-SpectorK.HensonR.MartinA. (2006). Repetition and the brain: Neural models of stimulus-specific effects.Trends in Cognitive Sciences10, 14–23.
41.
GrossmanE. D.BlakeR. (2002). Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion.Neuron35, 1167–1175.
42.
HalsbandU.SchmittJ.WeyersM.BinkofskiF.GrutznerG.FreundH. J. (2001). Recognition and imitation of pantomimed motor acts after unilateral parietal and premotor lesions: A perspective on apraxia.Neuropsychologia39, 200–216.
43.
HamiltonA.BrindleyR.FrithU. (2007). Imitation and action representation in autistic spectrum disorders: How valid is the hypothesis of a deficit in the mirror neuron system?.Neuropsychologia45, 1859–1868.
44.
HamiltonA.GraftonS. T. (2006). Goal representation in human anterior intraparietal sulcus.Journal of Neuroscience26, 1133–1137.
45.
HamiltonA.GraftonS. T. (2007). The motor hierarchy: From kinematics to goals and intentions.HaggardP.RossettiY.KawatoM.Attention and performance: XXII. Sensorimotor foundations of higher cognition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
HamiltonA.WolpertD.FrithU. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action.Current Biology14, 493–498.
47.
HappéF. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism.Child Development66, 843–855.
48.
HappéF.EhlersS.FletcherP.FrithU.JohanssonM.GillbergC. (1996). “theory of mind” in the brain. Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome.Neuroreport8, 197–201.
49.
HeilmanK. M.RothiL. J.ValensteinE. (1982). Two forms of ideomotor apraxia.Neurology32, 342–346.
50.
HeyesC. (2001). Causes and consequences of imitation.Trends in Cognitive Sciences5, 253–261.
51.
HobsonR. P. (1995). Autism and the development of mindHove, UK: Psychology Press.
52.
HobsonR. P.LeeA. (1999). Imitation and identification in autism.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry40, 649–659.
53.
IacoboniM.DaprettoM. (2006). The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction.Nature Reviews Neuroscience7, 942–951.
54.
IacoboniM.Molnar-SzakacsI.GalleseV.BuccinoG.MazziottaJ. C.RizzolattiG. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system.PLoS Biology3, e79.
55.
IacoboniM.WoodsR. P.BrassM.BekkeringH.MazziottaJ. C.RizzolattiG. (1999). Cortical mechanisms of human imitation.Science286, 2526–2528.
56.
IngersollB.SchreibmanL.TranQ. H. (2003). Effect of sensory feedback on immediate object imitation in children with autism.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders33, 673–683.
57.
JohnsonS. H.RotteM.GraftonS. T.HinrichsH.GazzanigaM. S.HeinzeH. J. (2002). Selective activation of a parietofrontal circuit during implicitly imagined prehension.Neuroimage17, 1693–1704.
58.
KeysersC.PerrettD. I. (2004). Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective.Trends in Cognitive Sciences8, 501–507.
59.
KeysersC.WickerB.GazzolaV.AntonJ. L.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2004). A touching sight: Sii/pv activation during the observation and experience of touch.Neuron42, 335–346.
60.
KilnerJ. M.PaulignanY.BlakemoreS. J. (2003). An interference effect of observed biological movement on action.Current Biology13, 522–525.
61.
KilnerJ. M.VargasC.DuvalS.BlakemoreS. J.SiriguA. (2004). Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement.Nature Neuroscience7, 1299–1301.
62.
LakinJ. L.ChartrandT. L. (2003). Using nonconscious behavioral mimicry to create affiliation and rapport.Psychological Science14, 334–339.
63.
LichtheimL. (1885). On aphasia.Brain7, 433–484.
64.
McIntoshD. N.Reichmann-DeckerA.WinkielmanP.WilbargerJ. L. (2006). When the social mirror breaks: Deficits in automatic, but not voluntary, mimicry of emotional facial expressions in autism.Developmental Science9, 295–302.
65.
MeltzoffA. (1995). Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children.Developmental Psychology31, 838–850.
66.
MozazM.RothiL. J.AndersonJ. M.CrucianG. P.HeilmanK. M. (2002). Postural knowledge of transitive pantomimes and intransitive gestures.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society8, 958–962.
67.
NadelJ. (2002). Imitation and imitation recognition: Functional use in preverbal infants and nonverbal children with autism.MeltzoffA.PrinzW.The imitative mind: Development, evolution and brain bases.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
68.
ObermanL. M.HubbardE. M.McCleeryJ. P.AltschulerE. L.RamachandranV. S.PinedaJ. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders.Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research24, 190–198.
69.
OhtaM. (1987). Cognitive disorders of infantile autism: A study employing the WISC, spatial relationship conceptualization, and gesture imitations.Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders17, 45–62.
70.
PelphreyK. A.MorrisJ. P.McCarthyG. (2004). Grasping the intentions of others: The perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience16, 1706–1716.
71.
PobricG.HamiltonA. F. (2006). Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex.Current Biology16, 524–529.
72.
RamachandranV. S.ObermanL. M. (2006). Broken mirrors: A theory of autism.Scientific American.
73.
RillingJ. K.GlasserM. F.PreussT. M.MaX.ZhangX.ZhaoT. (2006). A comparative diffusion tensor imaging study of the arcuate fasiculus pathway in humans, chimpanzees and rhesus macaques.Society of Neuroscience Abstracts.
74.
RizzolattiG.ArbibM. A. (1998). Language within our grasp.Trends in Neuroscience21, 188–194.
75.
RizzolattiG.CraigheroL. (2004). The mirror-neuron system.Annual Review of Neuroscience27, 169–192.
76.
RizzolattiG.FadigaL.MatelliM.BettinardiV.PaulesuE.PeraniD. (1996). Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution.Experimental Brain Research111, 246–252.
77.
RogersS. J.BennettoL.McEvoyR.PenningtonB. F. (1996). Imitation and pantomime in high-functioning adolescents with autism spectrum disorders.Child Development67, 2060–2073.
78.
RogersS. J.HepburnS. L.StackhouseT.WehnerE. (2003). Imitation performance in toddlers with autism and those with other developmental disorders.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry44, 763–781.
79.
RosenbaumD. A.MarchakF.BarnesH. J.JonathanVaughanJamesD. SlottaJorgensenM. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips.JeannerodM.Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates321–342.
80.
RothiL. J.OchipaC.HeilmanK. M. (1991). A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis.Cognitive Neuropsychology8, 443–458.
81.
RozziS.CalzavaraR.BelmalihA.BorraE.GregoriouG. G.MatelliM. (2006). Cortical connections of the inferior parietal cortical convexity of the macaque monkey.Cerebral Cortex16, 1389–1417.
82.
RussellJ.HillE. L. (2001). Action-monitoring and intention reporting in children with autism.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry42, 317–328.
83.
SebanzN.KnoblichG.StumpfL.PrinzW. (2005). Far from action blind: Action representation in individuals with autism.Cognitive Neuropsychology22, 433–454.
84.
SingerT.SeymourB.O'DohertyJ.KaubeH.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain.Science303, 1157–1162.
85.
SmithI. M.ByrsonS. E. (1998). Gesture imitation in autism: 1. Nonsymbolic postures and sequences.Cognitive Neuropsychology15, 747–770.
86.
StoneW. L.OusleyO. Y.LittlefordC. D. (1997). Motor imitation in young children with autism: What's the object?.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology25, 475–485.
87.
TessariA.RumiatiR. I. (2004). The strategic control of multiple routes in imitation of actions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance30, 1107–1116.
88.
TheoretH.HalliganE.KobayashiM.FregniF.Tager-FlusbergH.Pascual-LeoneA. (2005). Impaired motor facilitation during action observation in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.Current Biology15, R84–R85.
89.
TunikE.FreyS. H.GraftonS. T. (2005). Virtual lesions of the anterior intraparietal area disrupt goal-dependent on-line adjustments of grasp.Nature Neuroscience8, 505–511.
90.
UmiltàM. A.KohlerE.GalleseV.FogassiL.FadigaL.KeysersC. (2001). I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study.Neuron31, 155–165.
91.
UrgesiC.CandidiM.IontaS.AgliotiS. M. (2007). Representation of body identity and body actions in extrastriate body area and ventral premotor cortex.Nature Neuroscience10, 30–31.
92.
van BaarenR. B.HollandR. W.KawakamiK.van KnippenbergA. (2004). Mimicry and prosocial behavior.Psychological Science15, 71–74.
93.
WickerB.KeysersC.PlaillyJ.RoyetJ. P.GalleseV.RizzolattiG. (2003). Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust.Neuron40, 655–664.
94.
WilliamsJ. H.WhitenA.SinghT. (2004). A systematic review of action imitation in autistic spectrum disorder.Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders34, 285–299.
95.
WilliamsJ. H.WhitenA.SuddendorfT.PerrettD. I. (2001). Imitation, mirror neurons and autism.Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews25, 287–295.
96.
WilsonM.KnoblichG. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics.Psychological Bulletin131, 460–473.
97.
WohlschlägerA.GattisM.BekkeringH. (2003). Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.358, 501–515Series B.
