A major topic within human learning, the field of contingency judgement, began to emerge about 25 years ago following publication of an article on depressive realism by Alloy and Abramson (1979). Subsequently, associationism has been the dominant theoretical framework for understanding contingency learning but this has been challenged in recent years by an alternative cognitive or inferential approach. This article outlines the key conceptual differences between these approaches and summarizes some of the main methods that have been employed to distinguish between them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllanL. G.SiegelS.HannahS. (2007). The sad truth about depressive realism.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 482–495.
2.
AllanL. G.SiegelS.TangenJ. M. (2005). A signal detection analysis of contingency data.Learning & Behavior33, 250–263.
3.
AlloyL. B.AbramsonL. Y. (1979). Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General108, 441–485.
4.
ArcedianoF.MatuteH.EscobarM.MillerR. R. (2005). Competition between antecedent and between subsequent stimuli in causal judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 228–237.
5.
BalleineB. W.EspinetA.GonzálezF. (2005). Perceptual learning enhances retrospective revaluation of conditioned flavor preferences in rats.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes31, 341–350.
6.
BarghJ. A.ChenM.BurrowsL. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology71, 230–244.
7.
BarsalouL. W.SimmonsW. K.BarbeyA. K.WilsonC. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.Trends in Cognitive Sciences7, 84–91.
8.
BeckersT.De HouwerJ.PineñoO.MillerR. R. (2005). Outcome additivity and outcome maximality influence cue competition in human causal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 238–249.
9.
BoothS. L.BuehnerM. J. (2007). Asymmetries in cue competition in forward and backward blocking designs: Further evidence for causal model theory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 387–399.
10.
BrandonS. E.VogelE. H.WagnerA. R. (2000). A componential view of configural cues in generalization and discrimination in Pavlovian conditioning.Behavioural Brain Research110, 67–72.
11.
BrewerW. F. (1974). There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans.Cognition and the symbolic processes. WeimerW. B.PalermoD. S.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc1–42.
12.
BrownP. L.JenkinsH. M. (1968). Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key peck.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior11, 1–8.
13.
ChengP. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory.Psychological Review104, 367–405.
14.
CobosP. L.LópezF. J.CañoA.AlmarazJ.ShanksD. R. (2002). Mechanisms of predictive and diagnostic causal induction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes28, 331–346.
15.
CobosP. L.LópezF. J.LuqueJ. L. (2007). Interference between cues of the same outcome depends on the causal interpretation of the events.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 369–386.
16.
CollinsD. J.ShanksD. R. (2006). Conformity to the power PC theory of causal induction depends on the type of probe question.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59, 225–232.
17.
CorlettP. R.AitkenM. R. F.DickinsonA.ShanksD. R.HoneyG. D.HoneyR. A. E. (2004). Prediction error during retrospective revaluation of causal associations in humans: fMRI evidence in favor of an associative model of learning.Neuron44, 877–888.
18.
CrowderR. G. (1976). Principles of learning and memoryHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
DanksD. (2003). Equilibria of the Rescorla–Wagner model.Journal of Mathematical Psychology47, 109–121.
20.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT. (2002). Higher-order retrospective revaluation in human causal learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55B, 137–151.
21.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT. (2003). Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56B, 345–357.
22.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT.GlautierS. (2002). Outcome and cue properties modulate blocking.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55A, 965–985.
23.
De HouwerJ.BeckersT.VandorpeS. (2005a). Evidence for the role of higher order reasoning processes in cue competition and other learning phenomena.Learning & Behavior33, 239–249.
24.
De HouwerJ.VandorpeS.BeckersT. (2005b). On the role of controlled cognitive processes in human associative learning.New directions in human associative learning. WillsA. J.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc41–63.
25.
De HouwerJ.VandorpeS.BeckersT. (2007). Statistical contingency has a different impact on preparation judgements than on causal judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 418–432.
26.
DennistonJ. C.SavastanoH. I.BlaisdellA. P.MillerR. R. (2003). Cue competition as a retrieval deficit.Learning and Motivation34, 1–31.
27.
DickinsonA. (1980). Contemporary animal learning theoryCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28.
DickinsonA.BurkeJ. (1996). Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology49B, 60–80.
29.
DickinsonA.ShanksD. R.EvendenJ. L. (1984). Judgement of act–outcome contingency: The role of selective attribution.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology36A, 29–50.
30.
FieldA. P. (2005). Learning to like (or dislike): Associative learning of preferences.New directions in human associative learning. WillsA. J.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc221–252.
31.
FletcherP. C.AndersonJ. M.ShanksD. R.HoneyR.CarpenterT. A.DonovanT. (2001). Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory.Nature Neuroscience4, 1043–1048.
32.
FodorJ. A. (2003). Hume variationsOxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
33.
GallistelC. R.GibbonJ. (2001). Computational versus associative models of simple conditioning.Current Directions in Psychological Science10, 146–150.
34.
GhirlandaS. (2005). Retrospective revaluation as simple associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes31, 107–111.
35.
GluckM. A.BowerG. H. (1988). From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General117, 227–247.
36.
HagmayerY.WaldmannM. R. (2007). Inferences about unobserved causes in human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 330–355.
37.
HallG. (1991). Perceptual and associative learningOxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
38.
HebbD. O. (1949). Organization of behaviorNew York: Wiley.
39.
HershbergerW. A. (1986). An approach through the looking-glass.Animal Learning & Behavior14, 443–451.
40.
HintonG. E.AndersonJ. A. (1989). Parallel models of associative memory. HintonG. E.AndersonJ. A.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41.
HollandP. C. (1990). Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: Image and action.Cognition37, 105–131.
42.
HommelB.MüsselerJ.AscherslebenG.PrinzW. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning.Behavioral and Brain Sciences24, 849–937.
43.
JenkinsH. M.WardW. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes.Psychological Monographs79, (Whole Number 594).
44.
KahnemanD. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality.American Psychologist58, 697–720.
45.
KarazinovD. M.BoakesR. A. (2007). Second order conditioning in human predictive judgments when there is little time to think.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 448–460.
46.
KinderA.ShanksD. R. (2001). Amnesia and the declarative/nondeclarative distinction: A recurrent network model of classification, recognition, and repetition priming.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience13, 648–669.
47.
KinderA.ShanksD. R. (2003). Neuropsychological dissociations between priming and recognition: A single-system connectionist account.Psychological Review110, 728–744.
48.
LagnadoD. A.ShanksD. R. (2002). Probability judgment in hierarchical learning: A conflict between predictiveness and coherence.Cognition83, 81–112.
49.
LarkinM. J. W.AitkenM. R. F.DickinsonA. (1998). Retrospective revaluation of causal judgments under positive and negative contingencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition24, 1331–1352.
50.
Le PelleyM. E.OakeshottS. M.McLarenI. P. L. (2005). Blocking and unblocking in human causal learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes31, 56–70.
51.
LiveseyE. J.BoakesR. A. (2004). Outcome additivity, elemental processing and blocking in human causality judgements.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57B, 361–379.
52.
LópezF. J.CobosP. L.CañoA. (2005). Associative and causal reasoning accounts of causal induction: Symmetries and asymmetries in predictive and diagnostic inferences.Memory & Cognition33, 1388–1398.
53.
LópezF. J.CobosP. L.CañoA.ShanksD. R. (1998). The rational analysis of human causal and probability judgment.Rational models of cognition. OaksfordM.ChaterN.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press314–352.
54.
LovibondP. F. (2003). Causal beliefs and conditioned responses: Retrospective revaluation induced by experience and by instruction.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition29, 97–106.
55.
LovibondP. F.BeenS.-L.MitchellC. J.BoutonM. E.FrohardtR. (2003). Forward and backward blocking of causal judgment is enhanced by additivity of effect magnitude.Memory & Cognition31, 133–142.
56.
LovibondP. F.ShanksD. R. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes28, 3–26.
57.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
58.
MackintoshN. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learningOxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
59.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review88, 375–407.
60.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1985). Distributed memory and the representation of general and specific information.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General114, 159–188.
61.
McGeochJ. A.IrionA. L. (1952). The psychology of human learning. (2nd ed.). New York: Longmans, Green & Co.
62.
MelchersK. G.LachnitH.ShanksD. R. (2004). Within-compound associations in retrospective revaluation and in direct learning: A challenge for comparator theory.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57B, 25–53.
63.
MelchersK. G.LachnitH.ShanksD. R. (2006). The comparator theory fails to account for the selective role of within-compound associations in cue selection effects.Experimental Psychology53, 316–320.
64.
MitchellC. J.LiveseyE.LovibondP. F. (2007). A dissociation between causal judgement and the ease with which a cause is categorised with its effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 400–417.
65.
MitchellC. J.LovibondP. F. (2002). Backward and forward blocking in human electrodermal conditioning: Blocking requires an assumption of outcome additivity.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology55B, 311–329.
66.
MitchellC. J.LovibondP. F.MinardE.LavisY. (2006). Forward blocking in human learning sometimes reflects the failure to encode a cue–outcome relationship.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology59, 830–844.
67.
MsetfiR. M.MurphyR. A.SimpsonJ. (2007). Depressive realism and the effect of intertrial interval on judgements of zero, positive and negative contingencies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 461–481.
68.
OsmanM. (2004). An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoning.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review11, 988–1010.
69.
PearceJ. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review101, 587–607.
70.
PearceJ. M.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–552.
71.
PeralesJ. C.CatenaA.ShanksD. R.GonzálezJ. A. (2005). Dissociation between judgments and outcome-expectancy measures in covariation learning: A signal detection theory approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition31, 1105–1120.
72.
PeralesJ. C.ShanksD. R. (2003). Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgment.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology56A, 977–1007.
73.
PerruchetP.AmorimM.-A. (1992). Conscious knowledge and changes in performance in sequence learning: Evidence against dissociation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition18, 785–800.
74.
PineñoO.MillerR. R. (2007). Comparing associative, statistical, and inferential reasoning accounts of human contingency learning.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 310–329.
75.
PriceP. C.YatesJ. F. (1993). Judgmental overshadowing: Further evidence of cue interaction in contingency judgment.Memory & Cognition21, 561–572.
76.
RescorlaR. A.SolomonR. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian and instrumental learning.Psychological Review74, 151–182.
77.
RosenblattF. (1962). Principles of neurodynamicsNew York: Spartan.
78.
RyanJ. D.CohenN. J. (2003). Evaluating the neuropsychological dissociation evidence for multiple memory systems.Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience3, 168–185.
79.
SchultzW.DickinsonA. (2000). Neuronal coding of prediction errors.Annual Review of Neuroscience23, 473–500.
80.
ShanksD. R. (1985). Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgement.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology37B, 1–21.
81.
ShanksD. R. (1990). On the cognitive theory of conditioning.Biological Psychology30, 171–179.
82.
ShanksD. R. (2005a). Connectionist models of basic human learning processes.Connectionist models in cognitive psychology. HoughtonG.Hove, UK: Psychology Press45–82.
83.
ShanksD. R. (2005b). Implicit learning.Handbook of cognition. LambertsK.GoldstoneR. L.London: Sage202–220.
84.
ShanksD. R.DarbyR. J. (1998). Feature- and rule-based generalization in human associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes24, 405–415.
85.
ShanksD. R.DickinsonA. (1990). Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A comment on Baeyens, Eelen, and van den Bergh.Cognition & Emotion4, 19–30.
86.
ShanksD. R.DickinsonA. (1991). Instrumental judgment and performance under variations in action–outcome contingency and contiguity.Memory & Cognition19, 353–360.
87.
ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L. (1996). The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning. ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
88.
ShanksD. R.LovibondP. F. (2002). Autonomic and eyeblink conditioning are closely related to contingency awareness: Reply to Wiens and öhman (2002) and Manns et al. (2002).Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes28, 38–42.
89.
ShanksD. R.PearsonS. M.A production system model of causality judgment. Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyLawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncHillsdale, NJ1987210–220.
90.
ShanksD. R.St. JohnM. F. (1994). Characteristics of dissociable human learning systems.Behavioral and Brain Sciences17, 367–447.
91.
ShevillI.HallG. (2004). Retrospective revaluation effects in the conditioned suppression procedure.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57B, 331–347.
92.
SmedslundJ. (1963). The concept of correlation in adults.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology4, 165–173.
93.
SmithC. N.ClarkR. E.MannsJ. R.SquireL. R. (2005). Acquisition of differential delay eyeblink classical conditioning is independent of awareness.Behavioral Neuroscience119, 78–86.
94.
SquireL. R. (1994). Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory.Memory systems. SchacterD. L.TulvingE.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press203–231.
95.
TangenJ. M.AllanL. G.SadeghiH. (2005). Assessing (in)sensitivity to causal asymmetry: A matter of degree.New directions in human associative learning. WillsA. J.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc65–93.
96.
ThorndikeE. L. (1931). Human learningNew York: Century.
97.
TiltonJ. W. (1926). The relation between association and the higher mental processesNew York: Teachers College.
98.
TulvingE.DonaldsonW. (1972). Organization and memoryNew York: Academic Press.
99.
TunneyR. J.ShanksD. R. (2003). Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.Memory & Cognition31, 1060–1071.
100.
TurnerD. C.AitkenM. R. F.ShanksD. R.SahakianB. J.RobbinsT. W.SchwarzbauerC. (2004). The role of the lateral frontal cortex in causal associative learning: Exploring preventative and super-learning.Cerebral Cortex14, 872–880.
101.
VadilloM. A.MatuteH. (2007). Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 433–447.
102.
VandorpeS.De HouwerJ.BeckersT. (2007). Outcome maximality and additivity training also influence cue competition in causal learning when learning involves many cues and events.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology60, 356–368.
103.
WaldmannM. R. (2001). Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: Evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review8, 600–608.
104.
WaldmannM. R.HolyoakK. J.Can causal induction be reduced to associative learning?. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science SocietyLawrence Erlbaum Associates, IncHillsdale, NJ1990190–197.
105.
WilliamsD. A. (1996). A comparative analysis of negative contingency learning in humans and nonhumans.The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol 34. Causal learning. ShanksD. R.HolyoakK. J.MedinD. L.San Diego, CA: Academic Press89–131.
106.
WilliamsD. A.SagnessK. E.McPheeJ. E. (1994). Configural and elemental strategies in predictive learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition20, 694–709.
107.
WinmanA.WennerholmP.JuslinP.ShanksD. R. (2005). Evidence for rule-based processes in the inverse base-rate effect.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58A, 789–815.
108.
ZajoncR. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist35, 151–175.
109.
ZakiS. R. (2005). Is categorization performance really intact in amnesia? A meta-analysis.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review11, 1048–1054.
