A conditioned taste aversion experiment tested context-switch effects on retrieval of conditioned stimulus (CS)–unconditioned stimulus (US) acquisition performance in rats. A context switch impaired performance when the target flavour was trained in a context where a different flavour underwent extinction. Conditioned taste aversion in the absence of previous extinction of the alternate flavour was not context dependent. It is suggested that the ambiguity in the meaning of the extinguished cue leads animals to pay attention to the context, so that the information learned in that context becomes context dependent.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArcherT.SjödénP.NilssonL. (1985). Contextual control of taste-aversion conditioning and extinction.Context and learning. BalsamP. D.TomieA.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc225–271.
2.
BoutonM. E. (1993). Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning.Psychological Bulletin114, 80–99.
3.
BoutonM. E. (1997). Signals for whether versus when an event will occur.Learning, motivation, and cognition: The functional behaviorism of Robert C. Bolles. FanselowM. S.BoutonM. E.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association385–409.
4.
BoutonM. E.BollesR. C. (1979). Contextual control of the extinction of conditioned fear.Learning and Motivation10, 445–466.
5.
BoutonM. E.NelsonJ. B.RosasJ. M. (1999). Stimulus generalization, context change, and forgetting.Psychological Bulletin125, 171–186.
6.
BoutonM. E.RickerS. T. (1994). Renewal of extinguished responding in a second context.Animal Learning & Behavior22, 317–324.
7.
BoutonM. E.SwartzentruberD. (1986). Analysis of the associative and occasion-setting properties of context participating in a Pavlovian discrimination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes12, 333–350.
8.
DarbyR. J.PearceJ. M. (1995). Effects of context on responding during a compound stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes21, 143–154.
9.
HowellD. C. (1987). Statistical methods for psychologyBoston: Duxbury Press.
10.
KonorskiJ. (1948). Conditioned reflexes and neuron organizationCambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
MackintoshN. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement.Psychological Review82, 276–298.
12.
NelsonJ. B. (2002). Context specificity of excitation and inhibition in ambiguous stimuli.Learning and Motivation33, 284–310.
13.
PearceJ.HallG. (1980). A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.Psychological Review87, 532–552.
14.
RosasJ. M.BoutonM. E. (1996). Spontaneous recovery after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.Animal Learning & Behavior24, 341–348.
15.
RosasJ. M.BoutonM. E. (1998). Context change and retention interval have additive, rather than interactive, effects after taste aversion extinction.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review5, 79–83.
16.
RosasJ. M.Callejas-AguileraJ. E. (2006). Context switch effects on acquisition and extinction in human predictive learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition32, 461–474.
17.
RosasJ. M.García-GutiérrezA.Callejas-AguileraJ. E. (2006a). Effects of context change upon retrieval of first and second-learned information in human predictive learning.Psicológica27, 35–56.
18.
RosasJ. M.García-GutiérrezA.Callejas-AguileraJ. E. (2006b). AAB and ABA renewal as a function of the number of extinction trials in conditioned taste aversion. Manuscript submitted for publication.
19.
RosasJ. M.VilaN. J.LugoM.LópezL. (2001). Combined effect of context change and retention interval on interference in causality judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes27, 153–164.
20.
SjödénP.ArcherT. (1989). Taste-aversion conditioning: The role of contextual stimuli.Aversion, avoidance, and anxiety perspectives on aversively motivated behavior. ArcherT.NilssonL. G.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
21.
TamaiN.NakajimaS. (2000). Renewal of formerly conditioned fear in rats after extensive extinction training.International Journal of Comparative Psychology13, 137–146.
22.
ThomasB. L.LarsenN.AyresJ. J. B. (2003). Role of context similarity in ABA, ABC, and AAB renewal paradigms: Implications for theories of renewal and for treating human phobias.Learning and Motivation34, 410–436.
