We present evidence that (a) at least some components of the reading process are serial and (b) pseudoword reading is affected by lexical knowledge, even in a transparent orthographic system like Italian. Pseudowords deriving from five-letter words by changing either the first or the fourth letter were presented for reading aloud. Results showed an effect of the position of the diverging letter: Early diverging pseudowords were read more slowly than late diverging pseudowords. The dual-route cascaded (DRC) model (Coltheart, Rastle, Perry, Langdon, & Ziegler, 2001) successfully simulated the behavioural data.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArduinoL. S.BuraniC. (2004). Neighborhood effects on nonword visual processing in a language with shallow orthography.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research33, 75–95.
2.
BaluchB.BesnerD. (1991). Visual word recognition: Evidence for the strategic control of lexical and non-lexical routines in oral reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 644–652.
3.
ColtheartM.DavelaarE.JonassonJ. T.BesnerD. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon.Attention and performance. DornicS.London: Academic Press6, 535–555.
4.
ColtheartM.RastleK.PerryC.LangdonR.ZieglerJ. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review108, 204–256.
5.
GlushkoR. J. (1979). The organization and activation of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance5, 674–691.
HowardD. (1991). Letter-by-letter readers: Evidence for parallel processing.Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition. HumphreysG. W.BesnerD.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.34–76.
8.
InhoffA. W. (1989). Parafoveal processing of words and saccade computation during eye fixations in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance15, 544–555.
9.
Istituto di Linguistica Computazionale—CNR PisaCorpus di italiano contemporaneo1988[Contemporary Italian frequency count]. Unpublished manuscript.
10.
JobR.PeressottiF.CusinatoA. (1998). Lexical effects in naming pseudowords in shallow orthographies: Further empirical data.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 662–630.
11.
LaxonV.MastersonJ.PoolM.KeatingC. (1992). Nonword naming: Further exploration of the pseudohomophone effect in terms of neighborhood size, graphemic changes, spelling–sound consistency, and reader accuracy.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition8, 730–748.
12.
LupkerS. J.BrownP.ColomboL. (1997). Strategic control in a naming task: Changing route or changing deadlines?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition23, 570–590.
13.
Marslen-WilsonW. D. (1975). Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process.Science189, 226–228.
14.
McCannR. S.BesnerD. (1987). Reading pseudohomophones: Implications for models of pronunciation and the locus of word-frequency effects in word naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13, 14–24.
15.
McClellandJ. L.RumelhartD. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review88, 375–407.
16.
MulattiC.JobR. (2003a). Lettura di parole isolate: Un simulatore, un esperimento e una simulazioneTrento, Italy: Università degli Studi di Trento, Laboratorio di Scienze Cognitive [Reading isolated words: A simulator, an experiment and a simulation] (Rep. No. 19).
17.
MulattiC.JobR. (2003b). Lettura di parole “straniere” in italiano: Effetto della regolarità e della posizione dell'irregolarità [Reading foreign words in Italian: Regularity effect and effect of irregularity position].Giornale Italiano di Psicologia30, 883–893.
18.
MulattiC.ReynoldsM.BesnerD. (in press). Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: New facts and new challenges for computational models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
19.
PeeremanR.ContentA. (1995). Neighborhood size effect in naming: Lexical activation or sub-lexical correspondence?.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition21, 409–421.
20.
PlautD. C.McClellandJ. L.SeidenbergM. S.PattersonK. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review103, 56–115.
21.
RastleK.BrysbaertM. (in press). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter?.Cognitive Psychology.
22.
RastleK.ColtheartM. (in press). Is there serial processing in the reading system; and are there local representations?.From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing. AndrewsS.Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
23.
RaynerK. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading.Cognitive Psychology7, 65–81.
24.
ReynoldsM.BesnerD. (2002). Neighborhood density effects in reading aloud: New insight from simulations with the DRC model.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology56, 310–318.
25.
RumelhartD. E.McClellandJ. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: II. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model.Psychological Review89, 60–94.
26.
ScheererE. (1987). Visual word recognition in German.Language perception and production: Shared mechanism in listening, speaking, reading and writing. AllportA.MacKayD.PrinzW.ScheererE.London: Academic Press227–244.
27.
StokoeW. C. (2005). Sign Language Structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf.Journal of Deaf Studies & Deaf Education10, 3–37.
28.
TabossiP.LaghiL. (1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English.Memory and Cognition20, 303–313.
29.
Van SelstM.JolicœurP. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology47A, 631–650.
30.
VituF.BrysbaertM.LancelinD. (2004). A test of parafoveal-on-foveal effects with pairs of orthographically related words.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology16, 154–177.
31.
ZevinJ. D.BalotaD. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition26, 121–135.
32.
ZieglerJ. C.JacobsA. M.KlüppelD. (2001). Pseudohomophone effects in lexical decision: Still a challenge for current word recognition models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance27, 547–559.
33.
ZieglerJ. C.PerryC.ColtheartM. (2000). The DRC model of visual word recognition and reading aloud: An extension to German.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology12, 413–430.
34.
ZorziM. (2000). Serial processing in reading aloud: No challenge for a parallel model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance26, 847–856.
35.
ZorziM.HoughtonG.ButterworthB. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 1131–1161.
