Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2007-7
Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions
According to the preemptive-control hypothesis, participants can specify their control settings to attend to relevant target colours or to ignore the irrelevant distractor colours in advance of the displays. Two predictions of this hypothesis were tested. First, with the control settings being specified in advance, capture by a stimulus that better matches the settings was expected to temporally precede capture by a stimulus that matches the setting less well. Second, with the control settings being specified in advance, stronger capture by the better matching than by the less matching stimulus was predicted not to be a stimulus-driven consequence of the target colour in a preceding trial. Both predictions were shown to hold true under different conditions in three experiments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnsorgeU. (2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A, 1123–1148.
2.
AnsorgeU.HeumannM. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29, 937–948.
3.
AnsorgeU.HeumannM. (2004). Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: The influence of color in S–R corresponding conditions.Acta Psychologica116, 115–143.
4.
AnsorgeU.HeumannM.ScharlauI. (2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task.Consciousness and Cognition11, 528–545.
5.
AnsorgeU.HorstmannG.CarboneE. (2005). Top-down contingent capture by color: Evidence from RT distribution analyses in a manual choice reaction task.Acta Psychologica120, 243–266.
6.
AnsorgeU.NeumannO.Intentions determine the effect of nonconsciously registered visual information: Evidence for direct parameter specification in the metacontrast dissociationProceedings of the AISB'01 Symposium on Nonconscious Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial. AISBYork, UK20011–8.
7.
AnsorgeU.NeumannO. (2005). Intentions determine the effects of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance31, 362–377.
8.
AnsorgeU.ScharlauI.LabuddaK. (2006). Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors.Psychological Research70, 103–116.
BergenJ. R.JuleszB. (1983). Parallel vs. serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination.Nature303, 696–698.
11.
BravoM. J.NakayamaK. (1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks.Perception & Psychophysics51, 465–472.
12.
DeubelH.SchneiderW. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism.Vision Research36, 1827–1837.
13.
DowningC. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14, 188–202.
14.
DuncanJ.HumphreysG. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review96, 433–458.
15.
EglyR.HomaD. (1991). Reallocation of visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 142–159.
16.
EriksenC. W. (1953). Object location in a complex perceptual field.Journal of Experimental Psychology45, 126–132.
17.
FischerW.WeberH. (1993). Express saccades and visual attention.Behavioral and Brain Sciences16, 553–567.
18.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 847–858.
19.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W. (1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings?.Perception & Psychophysics61, 727–739.
20.
FolkC. L.RemingtonR. W.JohnstonJ. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance18, 1030–1044.
21.
FoundA.MüllerH. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account.Perception & Psychophysics58, 88–101.
22.
GibsonB. S.KelseyE. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 699–706.
23.
GreenB. F.AndersonL. K. (1956). Color coding in a visual-search task.Journal of Experimental Psychology51, 19–24.
24.
HendersonJ. M. (2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences7, 498–504.
25.
HorstmannG.AnsorgeU. (2006). Attentional shifts to rare singletons.Visual Cognition14, 295–325.
26.
HughesH. C.ZimbaL. D. (1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance11, 409–430.
27.
HughesH. C.ZimbaL. D. (1987). Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention.Neuropsychologia25, 5–18.
28.
KimM. S.CaveK. R. (1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor.Perception & Psychophysics61, 1009–1023.
29.
KochC.UllmannS. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology4, 219–227.
30.
LoganG. D. (1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General107, 32–63.
31.
MaljkovicV.NakayamaK. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features.Memory & Cognition22, 657–672.
32.
MüllerH. J.HellerD.ZieglerJ. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature target within and across feature dimensions.Perception & Psychophysics57, 1–17.
33.
NothdurftH.-C. (1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast.Vision Research31, 1073–1078.
34.
OliversC. N.HumphreysG. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance29, 650–657.
35.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32A, 3–25.
36.
PosnerM. I.CohenY. (1984). Components of visual orienting.Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. BoumaH.BouwhuisD. G.Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd531–556.
37.
RemingtonR.FolkC. L.McLeanJ. P. (2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention.Perception & Psychophysics63, 298–307.
38.
ScharlauI. (2004). The spatial distribution of attention in perceptual latency priming.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A, 1411–1437.
39.
ScharlauI.AnsorgeU. (2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming.Vision Research43, 1351–1363.
40.
TheeuwesJ. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form.Perception & Psychophysics51, 599–606.
41.
TheeuwesJ. (1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance20, 799–806.
42.
TheeuwesJ.AtchleyP.KramerA. F. (2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention.Attention and performance XVIII. MonsellS.DriverJ.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press105–125.
43.
TheeuwesJ.BurgerR. (1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance24, 1342–1353.
44.
TreismanA. M. (1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology40A, 201–237.
45.
TreismanA.KahnemanD.BurkellJ. (1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering.Perception & Psychophysics33, 527–532.
46.
TurattoM.GalfanoG. (2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set.Perception & Psychophysics63, 286–297.
47.
TurattoM.GalfanoG.GardiniS.MascettiG. G. (2004). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology57A, 297–324.
48.
VolbrechtV. J.NergerJ. L.ImhoffS. M.AydeC. A. (2000). The effect of the short-wavelength-sensitive-cone mosaic and rods on the locus of unique green.Journal of the Optical Society of America17A, 628–634.
49.
WilliamsL. G. (1966). Search time and color coding.Perception and Psychophysics1, 315–318.
50.
WolfeJ. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search.Psychonomic Bulletin and Review1, 202–238.
51.
WolfeJ. M.HorowitzT. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?.Nature Reviews Neuroscience5, 1–7.
52.
YantisS. (1996). Attentional capture in vision.Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. KramerA. F.ColesM. G. H.LoganG. D.Washington, DC: APA45–75.
53.
YantisS.EgethH. E. (1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 661–676.
