Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions

Abstract

According to the preemptive-control hypothesis, participants can specify their control settings to attend to relevant target colours or to ignore the irrelevant distractor colours in advance of the displays. Two predictions of this hypothesis were tested. First, with the control settings being specified in advance, capture by a stimulus that better matches the settings was expected to temporally precede capture by a stimulus that matches the setting less well. Second, with the control settings being specified in advance, stronger capture by the better matching than by the less matching stimulus was predicted not to be a stimulus-driven consequence of the target colour in a preceding trial. Both predictions were shown to hold true under different conditions in three experiments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ansorge

(2004). Top-down contingencies of nonconscious priming revealed by dual-task interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A, 1123–1148.

Ansorge

Heumann

(2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 937–948.

Ansorge

Heumann

(2004). Peripheral cuing by abrupt-onset cues: The influence of color in S–R corresponding conditions. Acta Psychologica 116, 115–143.

Ansorge

Heumann

Scharlau

(2002). Influences of visibility, intentions, and probability in a peripheral cuing task. Consciousness and Cognition 11, 528–545.

Ansorge

Horstmann

Carbone

(2005). Top-down contingent capture by color: Evidence from RT distribution analyses in a manual choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica 120, 243–266.

Ansorge

Neumann

Intentions determine the effect of nonconsciously registered visual information: Evidence for direct parameter specification in the metacontrast dissociation

Proceedings of the AISB'01 Symposium on Nonconscious Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial. AISB

York, UK

2001 1–8.

Ansorge

Neumann

(2005). Intentions determine the effects of invisible metacontrast-masked primes: Evidence for top-down contingencies in a peripheral cueing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31, 362–377.

Ansorge

Scharlau

Labudda

(2006). Visual search for a motion singleton among coherently moving distractors. Psychological Research 70, 103–116.

Bacon

W. F.

Egeth

H. E.

(1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics 55, 485–496.

10.

Bergen

J. R.

Julesz

(1983). Parallel vs. serial processing in rapid pattern discrimination. Nature 303, 696–698.

11.

Bravo

M. J.

Nakayama

(1992). The role of attention in different visual search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 465–472.

12.

Deubel

Schneider

W. X.

(1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research 36, 1827–1837.

13.

Downing

C. J.

(1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 14, 188–202.

14.

Duncan

Humphreys

G. W.

(1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96, 433–458.

15.

Egly

Homa

(1991). Reallocation of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 17, 142–159.

16.

Eriksen

C. W.

(1953). Object location in a complex perceptual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45, 126–132.

17.

Fischer

Weber

(1993). Express saccades and visual attention. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16, 553–567.

18.

Folk

C. L.

Remington

R. W.

(1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 847–858.

19.

Folk

C. L.

Remington

R. W.

(1999). Can new objects override attentional control settings?. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 727–739.

20.

Folk

C. L.

Remington

R. W.

Johnston

J. C.

(1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18, 1030–1044.

21.

Found

Müller

H. J.

(1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account. Perception & Psychophysics 58, 88–101.

22.

Gibson

B. S.

Kelsey

E. M.

(1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 699–706.

23.

Green

B. F.

Anderson

L. K.

(1956). Color coding in a visual-search task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 51, 19–24.

24.

Henderson

J. M.

(2003). Human gaze control during real-world scene perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 498–504.

25.

Horstmann

Ansorge

(2006). Attentional shifts to rare singletons. Visual Cognition 14, 295–325.

26.

Hughes

H. C.

Zimba

L. D.

(1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11, 409–430.

27.

Hughes

H. C.

Zimba

L. D.

(1987). Natural boundaries for the spatial spread of directed visual attention. Neuropsychologia 25, 5–18.

28.

Kim

M. S.

Cave

K. R.

(1999). Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 1009–1023.

29.

Koch

Ullmann

(1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 4, 219–227.

30.

Logan

G. D.

(1978). Attention in character-classification tasks: Evidence for the automaticity of component stages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 107, 32–63.

31.

Maljkovic

Nakayama

(1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 22, 657–672.

32.

Müller

H. J.

Heller

Ziegler

(1995). Visual search for singleton feature target within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 57, 1–17.

33.

Nothdurft

H.-C.

(1991). Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast. Vision Research 31, 1073–1078.

34.

Olivers

C. N.

Humphreys

G. W.

(2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, 650–657.

35.

Posner

M. I.

(1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 32A, 3–25.

36.

Posner

M. I.

Cohen

(1984). Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X: Control of language processes. Bouma

Bouwhuis

D. G.

Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd 531–556.

37.

Remington

Folk

C. L.

McLean

J. P.

(2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 298–307.

38.

Scharlau

(2004). The spatial distribution of attention in perceptual latency priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A, 1411–1437.

39.

Scharlau

Ansorge

(2003). Direct parameter specification of an attention shift: Evidence from perceptual latency priming. Vision Research 43, 1351–1363.

40.

Theeuwes

(1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 599–606.

41.

Theeuwes

(1994). Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: Selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20, 799–806.

42.

Theeuwes

Atchley

Kramer

A. F.

(2000). On the time course of top-down and bottom-up control of visual attention. Attention and performance XVIII. Monsell

Driver

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 105–125.

43.

Theeuwes

Burger

(1998). Attentional control during visual search: The effect of irrelevant singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, 1342–1353.

44.

Treisman

A. M.

(1988). Features and objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 40A, 201–237.

45.

Treisman

Kahneman

Burkell

(1983). Perceptual objects and the cost of filtering. Perception & Psychophysics 33, 527–532.

46.

Turatto

Galfano

(2001). Attentional capture by color without any relevant attentional set. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 286–297.

47.

Turatto

Galfano

Gardini

Mascetti

G. G.

(2004). Stimulus-driven attentional capture: An empirical comparison of display-size and distance methods. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 57A, 297–324.

48.

Volbrecht

V. J.

Nerger

J. L.

Imhoff

S. M.

Ayde

C. A.

(2000). The effect of the short-wavelength-sensitive-cone mosaic and rods on the locus of unique green. Journal of the Optical Society of America 17A, 628–634.

49.

Williams

L. G.

(1966). Search time and color coding. Perception and Psychophysics 1, 315–318.

50.

Wolfe

J. M.

(1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 1, 202–238.

51.

Wolfe

J. M.

Horowitz

T. S.

(2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5, 1–7.

52.

Yantis

(1996). Attentional capture in vision. Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention. Kramer

A. F.

Coles

M. G. H.

Logan

G. D.

Washington, DC: APA 45–75.

53.

Yantis

Egeth

H. E.

(1999). On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25, 661–676.