Short Article: Limiting the use of Verbal Coding in the Visual Patterns Test

Abstract

The aims of the study were to assess the availability of verbal coding and its effect on performance in a standard visual matrix task, the Visual Patterns Test (VPT). In a pilot study, participants were presented with the patterns from the VPT and were asked to name the shapes within them. Availability of verbal codes was low overall; however, some patterns resulted in a higher mean number of labels than others. A modified version of the test was created from those patterns that had produced the lowest mean number of labels. A total of 60 participants then took part in an experimental study, which was carried out to assess whether or not the availability of verbal coding affects task performance. It was found that the modified version resulted in a lower visual working-memory span than that of another version in which the availability of verbal coding was higher. The study confirmed that verbal coding does influence visual matrix task performance; however, the modified version now offers a selection of patterns from the VPT where verbal coding has been limited.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrade

Kemps

Werniers

May

Szmalec

(2002). Insensitivity of visual short-term memory to irrelevant visual information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 55A, 753–774.

Avons

S. E.

Phillips

W. A.

(1987). Representation of matrix patterns in long- and short-term visual memory. Acta Psychologica 65, 227–246.

Avons

S. E.

Sestieri

(2005). Dynamic visual noise: No interference with visual short-term memory or the construction of visual images. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17, 405–424.

Bruyer

Scailquin

(1999). Assessment of visuospatial short-term memory and effect of aging. European Review of Applied Psychology 49, 175–180.

Cocchini

Logie

R. H.

Della Sala

MacPherson

S. E.

Baddeley

(2002). Concurrent performance of two memory tasks: Evidence for domain-specific working memory systems. Memory & Cognition 30, 1086–1095.

Cohen

(1972). Serial position effects in the recall of picture sequences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 24, 41–47.

Cornoldi

Vecchi

(2003). Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences Hove, UK: Psychology Press.

Della Sala

Gray

Baddeley

Allamano

Wilson

(1999). Pattern span: A tool for unwelding visuo-spatial memory. Neuropsychologia 37, 1189–1199.

Della Sala

Gray

Baddeley

Wilson

(1997). Visual Patterns Test: A test of short-term visual recall Bury St, Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.

10.

Johnson

C. J.

Paivio

Clark

J. M.

(1996). Cognitive components of picture naming. Psychological Bulletin 120, 113–139.

11.

Logie

R. H.

Pearson

D. G.

(1997). The inner eye and the inner scribe of visuo-spatial working memory: Evidence from developmental fractionation. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9, 241–257.

12.

Paivio

(1971). Imagery and verbal processes New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

13.

Paivio

(1991). Images in mind: The evolution of a theory Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

14.

Phillips

W. A.

Baddeley

A. D.

(1971). Reaction time and short-term visual memory. Psychonomic Science 22, 73–74.

15.

Phillips

W. A.

Christie

D. F. M.

(1977). Components of visual memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 29, 117–133.

16.

Pickering

S. J.

Gathercole

S. E.

Hall

Lloyd

S. A.

(2001). Development of memory for pattern and path: Further evidence for the fractionation of visuo-spatial memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 54A, 397–420.

17.

Richardson

J. T. E.

(2003). Dual coding versus relational processing in memory for concrete and abstract words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 15, 481–509.

18.

Wilson

J. T. L.

Scott

J. H.

Power

K. G.

(1987). Developmental differences in the span of visual memory for pattern. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 5, 249–255.