When participants must respond to a relevant central target and ignore irrelevant flanking stimuli the flanking stimuli produce a compatibility effect, with increased response speed and accuracy on compatible as compared to incompatible trials. This flanker effect is larger when compatible trials are more frequent than incompatible trials (the ratio effect). A potential explanation of this ratio effect is that the occurrence of frequent incompatible trials causes the focus of spatial attention to be set narrower than when there are frequent compatible trials. The present investigation tests this hypothesis by comparing the flanker effect with near and far flankers. The hypothesis predicts that the flanker distance should modulate the ratio effect more when incompatible trials are frequent than when compatible trials are frequent. The results, however, show the opposite pattern: Distance effects are larger in conditions with frequent compatible trials. Moreover, the effect of distance but not the ratio effect was eliminated when flanker distance remained fixed across blocks of trials, and also when participants had to attend to flanker stimuli in a go–no-go task. These results suggest that the ratio effect does not result from an adjustment of the focus of spatial attention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BotvinickM.NystromL. E.FissellK.CarterC. S.CohenJ. D. (1999). Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulated cortex.Nature402, 179–181.
2.
CaseyB. J.ThomasK. M.WelshT. F.BadgaiyanR. D.EccardC.JenningsJ. R. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA97, 8728–8733.
3.
CohenA.ShoupR. E. (1993). Orientation asymmetry in the flanker task.Perception & Psychophysics53, 693–703.
4.
EgethH. (1977). Attention and preattention.The psychology of learning and motivation.BowerG. H.New York: Academic Press2, 277–232.
5.
EriksenB. A.EriksenC. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics16, 143–149.
6.
EriksenC. W.ColesM. G. H.MorrisL. R.O'HaraW. P. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society23, 165–168.
7.
EriksenC. W.HoffmanJ. E. (1972). Temporal and spatial characteristics of selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics12, 201–204.
8.
EriksenC. W.HoffmanJ. E. (1973). The extent of processing of noise elements during selective encoding from visual displays.Perception & Psychophysics14, 155–160.
9.
EriksenC. W.PanK.BotellaJ. (1993). Attentional distribution in visual space.Psychological Reasearch56, 130–135.
10.
EriksenC. W.St.JamesJ. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics40, 225–240.
11.
GrattonG.ColesM. G. H.DonchinE. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General121, 480–506.
12.
GrattonG.ColesM. G. H.SirevaagE. J.EriksenC. W.DonchinE. (1988). Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance14, 331–344.
13.
HommelB. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation.Psychological Research56, 261–268.
14.
JonidesJ. (1983). Further toward a model of the mind's eye's movement.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society21, 247–250.
15.
KoppB.MattlerU.GoertzR.RistF. (1996a). N2 P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a nogo task involving selective response priming.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology99, 19–27.
16.
KoppB.RistF.MattlerU. (1996b). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioural tool for investigating executive control.Psychophysiology33, 282–294.
17.
KornblumS.StevensG. T.WippleA.RequinJ. (1999). The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response consistency effects with stroop-like stimuli, simon-like tasks, and their factorial combination.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance25, 688–714.
18.
KramerA. F.JacobsonA. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing.Perception & Psychophysics50, 267–284.
19.
LaBergeD. (1983). Spatial extent of attention to letters and words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance9, 371–379.
20.
LaBergeD.BrownV.CarterM.BashD.HartleyA. (1991). Reducing the effects of adjacent distractors by narrowing attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance17, 65–76.
21.
LavieN. (1995). Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance21, 451–468.
22.
LavieN.TsalY. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Performance56, 183–197.
23.
LoganG. D. (1980). Attention and automaticity in Stroop and priming tasks: Theory and data.Cognitive Psychology12, 523–553.
24.
LoganG. D.ZbrodoffN. J. (1979). When it helps to be misled: Facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task.Memory & Cognition7, 166–174.
25.
LoganG. D.ZbrodoffN. J.WilliamsonJ. (1984). Stategies in the color–word Stroop task.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society22, 135–138.
MattlerU. (2005). Flanker effects on motor output and the late-level response activation hypothesis.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology58A, 577–601.
28.
MillerJ. (1991). The flanker compatibility effect as a function of visual angle, attentional focus, visual transients, and perceptual load: A search for boundary conditions.Perception & Psychophysics49, 270–288.
29.
PashlerH.BaylisG. C. (1991). Procedural learning: II. Intertrial repetition effects in speeded-choice tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition17, 33–48.
30.
PosnerM. I. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology32, 3–25.
31.
RidderinkhofK. R. (2002). Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses.Common mechanisms in perception and action. Attention & performance.PrinzW.HommelB.Oxford, UK: Oxford University PressXIX, 494–519.
32.
RidderinkhofK. R.van der MolenM. W.BashoreT. R. (1995). Limits on the application of additive factors logic: Violations of stage robustness suggest a dual-process architecture to explain flanker effects on target processing.Acta Psychologica90, 29–48.
33.
Servan-SchreiberD.PrintzH.CohenJ. D. (1990). A network model of catecholamine effects: Gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior.Science249, 892–895.
34.
SimonJ. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing.Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective.ProctorR. W.ReeveT. G.Amsterdam: Elsevier31–86.
35.
SmidH. G. O. M.MulderG.MulderL. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. [Special Issue: Stage analysis of the reaction process: Models, methods and applications].Acta Psychologica74, 169–201.
36.
StroopJ. R. (1992). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General121, 15–23(Reprinted from Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1935, 18, 643–662).
37.
StürmerB.LeutholdH.SoetensE.SchröterH.SommerW. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon-task: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance28, 1345–1363.
38.
TothJ. P.LevineB.StussD. T.OhA.WinocurG.MeiranN. (1995). Dissociation of processes underlying spatial S–R compatibility: Further evidence for independent influence of what and where.Consciousness & Cognition4, 483–501.
